Chennai Court August 2016 Judgments
K. Mohamed Sajid Vs. All India Council for Technical Education, rep.by ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to take action against the third respondent for collecting capitation fees from the petitioner for pursuing his B.E.(Mechanical Engineering) for the academic year 2009-2010 and consequently, to direct the third respondent to refund a sum of Rs.1,65,000/- collected from the petitioner as capitation fees.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition to direct the third respondent to refund a sum of Rs.1,65,000/- collected from him for giving admission. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, during the last session, the learned Counsel appearing for the third respondent agreed to refund a sum of Rs.1,65,000/- to the petitioner. The Learned counsel for the petitioner also agreed to receive the said amount in full and final settlement. 3. When the Writ Petition was taken up for consideration today, learned Counsel for the petitioner submi...
Tag this Judgment!Prabhu and Another Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kancheepuram District at Chengalpattu, in S.C.No.70 of 2011 dated 30.04.2015.)S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The Appellants are Accused Nos.1 and 2 in S.C.No.70 of 2011 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kancheepuram at Chengalpattu. They stood charged for offences as detailed below:- ChargeNumberCharge(s)framed againstPenal provision under whichcharge framed1A1 and A2Section 506(ii) r/w 34 of IPC2A1 and A2Section 363 r/w 34 of IPC3A1 and A2Section 365 r/w 34 of IPC4A1 and A2Section 364-A of IPC5A1 and A2Section 386 r/w 34 of IPC6A1Section 465 of IPC7A2Section 114 r/w 465 of IPC8A1 and A2Section 468 r/w 34 of IPC9A1Section 471 r/w 46510A2Section 109 r/w 471 and 465 of IPC The trial court, by judgement, dated 30.04.2015, convicted and sentenced them as detailed below:- Rank of theAccusedPenal provision underwhich...
Tag this Judgment!K. Ganesan Vs. The District Collector, Collectoate, and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to grant patta in the petitioner name for the property situated in S.No.462/18, Malakottai Village, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District, on the basis of petitioner's patta transfer application dated 28.02.2011.) 1. The petitioner wanted the Tahsildar to mutate the entry with regard to patta on the strength of the Will. Since representation for mutation was not taken up by the second respondent, the petitioner is before this Court. 2. The petitioner is no where connected with the property bearing S.No.462/18, Malakottai Village, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. According to him, he supported one Ramakkal, who succeeded the property owned by her husband Thirumalainayakar. Thereafter, the said Ramakkal executed a Will on 29.04.2010 in favour of the petitioner and she died. It was only on the strength of the Will, the petitioner wanted t...
Tag this Judgment!Jayakani (Deceased) and Others Vs. M. Sivasami
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
(Prayer:Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Fair Order and Decretal Order, dated 24.07.2007, passed in I.A.No.73 of 2007 in O.S.No.274 of 1996, on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Tiruppur.) 1. The second defendant in O.S.No.274 of 1996 is the revision petitioner before this Court, challenging the order passed in I.A.No.73 of 2007 in O.S.No.274 of 1996 dated 24.07.2007, this Civil Revision Petition has been filed. 2. The case of the plaintiff is that he has filed the suit in O.S.No.274 of 1996 against the defendant one Mr.K.Eswaramoorthy and Jayakani, for specific performance. 3. The case of the plaintiff is that the petitioner and the defendants were entered into the sale agreement on 09.08.1995 for selling the suit property at the rate of Rs.1,50,000/- on the date of execution of the sale agreement itself as a part of the sale consideration the defendant have received a sum of Rs.75,000/- given to the defendant in advance...
Tag this Judgment!N. Palaniyappan Vs. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Devakottai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to consider the Petitioner's representations, dated 04.04.2016 and 04.08.2016 to survey and fix the boundaries of the house land measuring to an extent of 19.32 Cents in Old Survey No.133/1, New Survey No.211/3 Natham situate at Thanichavoorani Village, Sirumarudhur Ulkadai, Sirumarudhur Group, Devakkottai, Karaikudi District, within a stipulated time.) 1. Heard both sides. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. No counter-affidavit is filed on behalf of the Respondent. 2. Admittedly, the Petitioner's representations, dated 04.04.2016 and 04.08.2016 seeking to survey and fix the boundaries of the house land measuring an extent of 19.32 Cents in Old Survey No.133/1, New Survey No.211/3 Natham situated at Thanichavoorani Village, Sirumarudhur Ulkadai, Sirumarudhur Group, Devakkottai, Karaikudi, Sivagangai Di...
Tag this Judgment!Muthuramu Vs. The District Collector, Sivagangai District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the First Respondent to dispose of his representation dated 06.06.2016 submitted in person within a time frame as fixed by this Court following the due process of law besides directing the respondents 2 to 4 not to take any coercive steps of eviction and demolition of his bunk shop situated in 2-3/26, Thayamangalam, Ilayankudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.) 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner; the Learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the Learned Government Advocate for the Respondent Nos.3 and 4. 2. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. No Counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, his representation, dated 06.06.2016, addressed to the First Respondent in person requesting him to issue necessary directions to Respondent Nos.2 to 4 not to evict and dem...
Tag this Judgment!S. Ganapathy Vs. The Chairman and Managing Director, Indian Overseas B ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent in No.DO.VIG;GM(NKG);DA1-7603;4289;2013-2014 dated 30.10.2013 as confirmed by the order of the second respondent in DO;VIG;ED(ADMC);DA;7603;1016;2014-15 dated 08.05.2014 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential and other attendant benefits.) 1. The petitioner calls in question the order dated 08.05.2014 of the second respondent/disciplinary authority, dismissing the petitioner from service, which was confirmed by the order dated 30.10.2013 of the third respondent/appellate authority. 2. The petitioner joined the services of the Indian Overseas Bank as Clerk on 22.09.1982. After successive promotion, he was working as Manager of the Indian Overseas Bank and posted in various branches. When the petitioner was working as such, on 03.01.2011, b...
Tag this Judgment!V. Kulandaisamy Vs. The New India Assurance Co.Ltd. and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
(Prayer: The Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 31.08.1994 in O.S.No.294 of 1991 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin.) 1. The Appeal Suit is filed by the 2nd defendant against the decree and judgment dated 31.08.1994 passed in O.S.No.294 of 1991 by the learned Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin. 2. The respondents 1 and 2, as the plaintiffs, have filed a Suit in O.S.No.294 of 1991, for recovery of an amount of Rs.54,086/-, with interest at the rate of 18% per annum, from the defendants, stating that the 2nd plaintiff namely, Lakshmi Match Factory, a partnership Firm, manufacturing and selling of safety matches at Kovilpatti. On 13.06.1990, the 2nd plaintiff entrusted to deliver 500 bundles of safety matches, through the 1st defendant, namely, Venkateswara Lorry Transport, to M/s. Commercial Enterprises at Howrah and a lorry receipt No.2287, dated 13.06.2000, has been given for accepting the same and the consignments were loaded ...
Tag this Judgment!D. Gabriel Johnson Vs. The District Educational Officer, Tenkasi Educa ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
(Prayer: in W.P(MD)No.5346 of 2016 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS to call for the records of the impugned order of the 1st respondent in O.Mu.No.2856/A3/2015 dated 18.5.2015 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to approve the petitioner's appointment as Junior Assistant in the 2nd respondent school from date of appointment i.e. 17.07.13 and pay all monetary and service benefits within the time fixed by this Court. Prayer in W.P(MD)No.6047 of 2016 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS to call for the records of the impugned order of the 1st respondent in O.Mu.No.3763/A1/2014 dated 19.09.14 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to approve the petitioner's appointment as Junior Assistant in the 2nd respondent school from the date appointment i.e. 02.05.14 and pay all...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Vs. The District Collector, Thoothukudi District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to pass orders on the Petitioner's appeal, dated 26.05.2011 in the light of the report submitted by the 3rd Respondent in Na.Ka.No.A2/19751/2011, dated .09.2012, within a stipulated time.) 1. Heard both sides. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. No counter-affidavit is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 2. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition before this Court praying for passing of an order by this Court in directing the Second Respondent to pass orders on his Appeal, dated 26.05.2011 in the light of the report submitted by the Third Respondent in Na.Ka.No.A2/19751/2011, undated 09/2012, within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court. 3. It comes to be known that the Third Respondent had conducted a detailed enquiry and by means of his proceedings during September, 2012, had submi...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »