Rajesh Vs. The District Collector, Thoothukudi District and Others

Rajesh vs The District Collector, Thoothukudi District and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Aug 31, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1188601

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1188601
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: M. Venugopal
Decided On: Aug 31, 2016
Case Number: W.P(MD)No. 16298 of 2016
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajesh

Respondent

The District Collector, Thoothukudi District and Others

Excerpt

.....orders on his appeal, dated 26.05.2011 in the light of the report submitted by the third respondent in na.ka.no.a2/19751/2011, undated 09/2012, within a time frame to be stipulated by this court. 3. it comes to be known that the third respondent had conducted a detailed enquiry and by means of his proceedings during september, 2012, had submitted a report the second respondent. the grievance of the petitioner is that the second respondent till date has not passed any orders on his appeal, which was filed in the year 2011. 4. considering the fact that nearly five years have rolled by and the appeal is pending for disposal, at this stage, this court without expressing any opinion one way or other or not traversing upon the merits and contents of the appeal preferred by the petitioner, in the interest of justice and fair play, directs the second respondent to pass necessary orders on the petitioner's pending appeal, dated 26.05.2011, within a period of five weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order (of course after adhering to the principles of natural justice by issuing notice to the petitioner and others concerned if any, if situation so warrants). said order in the appeal is to be passed by the second respondent with a opened mind and in a dispassionate manner and especially uninfluenced and untrammeled with any of the observations made by this court in the present writ petition. needless for this court to make a significant mention that the petitioner is to render his assistance and unstinted co-operation to the second respondent in the subject matter in issue. with the above said direction(s)/observation(s), this writ petition stands disposed of. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2^nd Respondent to pass orders on the Petitioner's appeal, dated 26.05.2011 in the light of the report submitted by the 3^rd Respondent in Na.Ka.No.A2/19751/2011, dated .09.2012, within a stipulated time.)

1. Heard both sides. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. No counter-affidavit is filed on behalf of the Respondents.

2. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition before this Court praying for passing of an order by this Court in directing the Second Respondent to pass orders on his Appeal, dated 26.05.2011 in the light of the report submitted by the Third Respondent in Na.Ka.No.A2/19751/2011, undated 09/2012, within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court.

3. It comes to be known that the Third Respondent had conducted a detailed enquiry and by means of his proceedings during September, 2012, had submitted a report the Second Respondent. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the Second Respondent till date has not passed any orders on his appeal, which was filed in the year 2011.

4. Considering the fact that nearly five years have rolled by and the Appeal is pending for disposal, at this stage, this Court without expressing any opinion one way or other or not traversing upon the merits and contents of the Appeal preferred by the Petitioner, in the interest of justice and fair play, directs the Second Respondent to pass necessary orders on the Petitioner's pending Appeal, dated 26.05.2011, within a period of five weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order (Of course after adhering to the Principles of Natural Justice by issuing notice to the Petitioner and others concerned if any, if situation so warrants). Said order in the Appeal is to be passed by the Second Respondent with a opened mind and in a dispassionate manner and especially uninfluenced and untrammeled with any of the observations made by this Court in the Present Writ Petition. Needless for this Court to make a significant mention that the Petitioner is to render his assistance and unstinted co-operation to the Second Respondent in the subject matter in issue.

With the above said Direction(s)/Observation(s), this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No Costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Rajesh vs The District Collector, Thoothukudi District and Ot... Same Subject Education Same Judge M. Venugopal