Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ashokkumar Vs. The Additional Director of Police Prisons and Inspector General of Prisons and Another

Ashokkumar vs The Additional Director of Police Prisons and Inspector General of Prisons and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Aug 29, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1188696

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P(MD).No. 957 of 2016 & W.M.P(MD)No. 752 of 2016
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ashokkumar

Respondent

The Additional Director of Police Prisons and Inspector General of Prisons and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 2nd respondent made in no.2775/kici2/2012, dated 02.05.2013, and the impugned order of the 1st respondent made in no.43639/es2/2013, dated 09.05.2013, and quash the same as illegal consequently, to direct the respondents to consider petitioner's claim for the post of junior assistant on compassionate ground in their department.) 1. this writ petition is listed today under the caption for withdrawal on the basis of letter of requisition given by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to the registry. 2. recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 2nd respondent made in No.2775/KiCi2/2012, dated 02.05.2013, and the impugned order of the 1st respondent made in No.43639/ES2/2013, dated 09.05.2013, and quash the same as illegal consequently, to direct the respondents to consider petitioner's claim for the post of Junior Assistant on compassionate ground in their department.)

1. This writ petition is listed today under the caption for withdrawal on the basis of letter of requisition given by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to the Registry.

2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial