Chennai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Subramanian Vs. Tiruchirappalli City Corporation, Trichy and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to issue proper license to the petitioner to restore the water connection and collect rent for Golden Broiler and Tiffen Centre run at 10/2, Kandhayya Pillai Street, Srirangam and pass such further or other orders.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. According to the petitioner, his father was an employee of Srirangam Municipality (Since merged with the first respondent/Trichirappalli City Municipal Corporation). For his father's service, after retirement in the year 1961, he was given lease of a vacant land in ward No.3, Kandhayya Pillai Street, Srirangam and a building was built by his father and assigned door No.10, (New No.2) Kandhayya Pillai Street, Srirangam and was assessed to building tax and assessment number is 9173. The stand of the petitioner is that after the demise of his father, he modified the building and converted into two shops and contin...
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Thanjavu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer: This Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 06.12.2014 passed in M.C.O.P.No.1029 of 2003 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Special Sub Court, Thanjavur.) 1. Aggrieved over the award dated 06.12.2014, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Special Sub Court, Thanjavur, in M.C.O.P.No.1029 of 2003, the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation has filed the present appeal. 2. The brief facts of the case are that on 27.04.2003 at about 10.45 a.m., when the claimant was proceeding in his motorcycle bearing Registration No.TN49A 9353 from Mannarkudi to Magadevapattanam, a bus Route No.453-E came in a rash and negligent manner, hit against the motorcycle and thereby the claimant sustained grievous injuries. He filed a claim petition claiming compensation of Rs.6,00,000/-. 3. The claim was resisted by the appellant, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation disputing the age, occupation and income of the claimant and pray...
Anbujothi @ Jothi Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under section 372[4] Cr.P.C., against the judgment and sentence dated 09.08.2011 pronounced and imposed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam in sC.No.218/2008.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the first accused in SC.No.208/2012 on the file of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam. There were six other accused in the case arrayed as A2 to A7. Yet another accused by name Balamurugan @ Murugan, who was arrayed as one of the accused in the Final Report, was not tried as he passed away before the charges were framed against him. The Trial Court framed charges as against all the seven accused as detailed below:- ad>Rank of the AccusedCharges framedA2, A6 and A7120-B IPCA1 to A5148 IPCA1 to A5302 @ 302 r/w 34 IPCA1 to A5506[ii] IPCA6 and A7302 r/w 114 IPC By judgment dated 09.08.2011, the Trial Court acquitted A2 to A7 from all charges ; but convicted A1 alone u/s.148 and 302 read with 34 IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous...
K. Saibu Nisha Vs. The Tahsildar, East Taluk, Othakkadai, Madurai and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to register the Petitioner's son's name in his Birth Extract upon his representation dated 17.4.2014, within the time stipulated by this Court.) This Court has heard the Abdul Lathif/son of the Petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondents. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. It comes to be known from the contents of the Writ Affidavit(filed by the Petitioner) that she being a poor illiterate and un-acquainted with the statutory provisions and her husband also working in abroad, her son's name Abdul Lathif, born on 02.04.1993 was not inserted in the Birth Extract within the statutory period. 5. It is the case of the Petitioner that her son above-named was born on 02.04.1993 at No.2/55, South Street,...
M. Arumugam Vs. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
N. Kirubakaran, J. 1. The petitioner is running a firm, which is engaged in the business of weaving of cotton fabrics with the help of 16 Auto Looms with the capacity of sanctioned demand of 111.77KW bearing Service Connection No. 860-III B. According to the petitioner, his unit has no need or necessity to use more than the sanctioned demand of 111.77KW. While so, the 2nd respondent visited the petitioner's unit and informed that the unit had reached the maximum demand of 154.08KW in the month of October, 2012, which is beyond the permitted load of 111.77KW and demanded Rs.1,22,573/- towards penalty for the maximum demand KW and Rs.2,02,898/- towards monthly consumption charges and has also issued the order dated 29.10.2012 on the same day. According to the 2nd respondent, the sum of Rs.1,22,573/- demanded is the penalty of 1.5% for every KW, over and above 111.77 KW as the petitioner's unit had reached the maximum demand of 154.08KW in the month of October, 2012 beyond the permitted l...
P.K. Selvendran, Minor Vs. The Director of Government Examination, Che ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent herein to award 3.5 marks to the Petitioner(Registration No.370078) for question Nos. 28,30, 36 and 37 in Zoology subject in the Higher Secondary Examination conducted in 2015-2016 and consequently to direct the second respondent to admit the Petitioner in the MBBS Course for the academic year 2016-2017.) 1. The Petitioner has focussed the instant Writ Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in directing the First Respondent/The Director of Government Examination(Higher Secondary Examination), Chennai- 600 006 to award 3.5 marks to the Petitioner(Registration No.370078) for question Nos. 28,30, 36 and 37 in Zoology subject in the Higher Secondary Examination conducted in 2015-2016.Further, he has sought for passing of an order by this Court in directing the second respondent to admit the Petitioner in the MBBS Course f...
M.V. Anainthaperumal Vs. The District Collector/Inspector of Panchayat ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the impugned order passed by the First Respondent made in A8/612/2013, dated 13.7.2013 in cancelling the Panchayat Meeting, dated 31.01.2013, 22.02.2013 and 05.03.2013 as well as the resolution made in the panchayat on the said dates bearing Nos.123, 131, 132,133, 134, 137, 138, 140, 141, 142, 143 and 144 respectively and to quash the same forthwith.) 1. Heard the respective Learned Additional Government Pleaders for the Respondents 1 and 2. 2. According to the Petitioner, the First Respondent/The District Collector/Inspector of Panchayats, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli on 13.07.2013 passed an order cancelling the various resolutions passed in the Mayamankurichi Village Panchayat, Alangulam Panchayat Union, Kuruvankottai, Tirunelveli District, by holding that the meetings were conducted contrary to the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994, as per proce...
K.N. Devadoss Vs. Marimuthu, Tahsildar,Madurai South Taluk,Colletorate ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer:Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying this Court to punish the Contemnor/Respondent for his wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court made in W.P(MD)No.20080 of 2014, dated 11.12.2014.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. It is represented on behalf of the Respondent that the Respondent/The Tahsildar, Madurai South Taluk, Collectorate Campus, Madurai, in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.6907/2015/S, dated 25.09.2015, had informed that there is variation in extent in regard to the enjoyment of 10 cents of the Petitioner and that of the place sub-dividided as per the Village Accounts and further, based on the report of the Circle Deputy Inspector, the Petitioner can file an appeal before the Assistant Director of Land Survey, Madurai District and to seek an order for change of patta. 3. Inasmuch as the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.20080 of 2014, dated 11.12.2014, was only to look into the representation of the Petitioner, dated 7.2.2...
S. Nageshwari Vs. The State Bank of India, Rep. by its Branch Manager, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of mandamus directing the respondent bank to immediately disburse forthwith to the petitioner the installments of educational loan sanctioned to the petitioner and payable for the years 2014 and 2015 and to direct the respondent bank to promptly release to the petitioner the further remaining installments as and when they are payable without any further delay.) 1. According to the petitioner, she is pursuing her Bachelor of Siddha Medicine and Surgery at Velumailu Siddha Medical College and Hospital, Sriperumbudur, Kanchipuram District. The period of course of study comprises of 3 semesters with each semester period of 1 years and thereafter 1 year internship course, as such, the course period of B.S.M.S is 5 years. The stand of the petitioner is that she hails from a very poor family and although she was able to secure admission to BSMS course, she was unable to meet the expenses relati...
S. Ramasamy Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by the Secretary to Gover ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned order passed by the 5th Respondent in O.Mu.No.435-2015-A1 dated 03.09.2015 and quash the same and consequently Direct the Respondents to revise the Petitioners Pension in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.363 Finance (PGC) Department dated 23.08.2013 and to pay the consequential arrears. S. Ramasamy, retired Police Constable has come to this Court, challenges the impugned order, dated 03.09.2015 passed by the Sub-Treasury Officer, Pudukottai District, wherein, the respondents refused to pay amount as per G.O.Ms.No.363, Finance (PGC) Department dated 23.08.2013....
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »