K.N. Devadoss Vs. Marimuthu, Tahsildar,Madurai South Taluk,Colletorate Campus

K.N. Devadoss vs Marimuthu, Tahsildar,Madurai South Taluk,Colletorate Campus

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jul 05, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190013

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1190013
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: M. Venugopal
Decided On: Jul 05, 2016
Case Number: CONT.P(MD)No. 1224 of 2015 in W.P(MD)No. 20080 of 2014
Subject: Contempt of Court

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contempt of Court

Key legal issue: Contempt of Court

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.N. Devadoss

Respondent

Marimuthu, Tahsildar,Madurai South Taluk,Colletorate Campus

Excerpt

(prayer:contempt petition filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act praying this court to punish the contemnor/respondent for his wilful disobedience of the order passed by this court made in w.p(md)no.20080 of 2014, dated 11.12.2014.) 1. heard both sides. 2. it is represented on behalf of the respondent that the respondent/the tahsildar, madurai south taluk, collectorate campus, madurai, in his proceedings in na.ka.no.6907/2015/s, dated 25.09.2015, had informed that there is variation in extent in regard to the enjoyment of 10 cents of the petitioner and that of the place sub-dividided as per the village accounts and further, based on the report of the circle deputy inspector, the petitioner can file an appeal before the assistant director of land survey, madurai district and to seek an order for change of patta. 3. inasmuch as the order passed by this court in w.p(md)no.20080 of 2014, dated 11.12.2014, was only to look into the representation of the petitioner, dated 7.2.2014 etc., by the respondent and since the same has been complied with by the respondent, the contempt petition stands closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer:Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying this Court to punish the Contemnor/Respondent for his wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court made in W.P(MD)No.20080 of 2014, dated 11.12.2014.)

1. Heard both sides.

2. It is represented on behalf of the Respondent that the Respondent/The Tahsildar, Madurai South Taluk, Collectorate Campus, Madurai, in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.6907/2015/S, dated 25.09.2015, had informed that there is variation in extent in regard to the enjoyment of 10 cents of the Petitioner and that of the place sub-dividided as per the Village Accounts and further, based on the report of the Circle Deputy Inspector, the Petitioner can file an appeal before the Assistant Director of Land Survey, Madurai District and to seek an order for change of patta.

3. Inasmuch as the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.20080 of 2014, dated 11.12.2014, was only to look into the representation of the Petitioner, dated 7.2.2014 etc., by the Respondent and since the same has been complied with by the Respondent, the Contempt Petition stands closed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties K.N. Devadoss vs Marimuthu, Tahsildar,Madurai South Taluk,Col... Same Subject Contempt of Court Same Judge M. Venugopal