Chennai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Selvaraj and Others Vs. Meenakshiammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer: Review Application filed under Section 114 r/w Order 47 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code to review the Orders in CRP (NPD) No.1958 of 2004 dated 18.07.2014.) 1. Heard Both sides. 2. The respondent /auction purchaser has filed an application under Order XXI Rule 95 of the Civil Procedure Code in the Execution Petition in E.P.No.80 of 2002 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Ariyalur for taking possession of the property, purchased by her. 3. The Executing Court dismissed the application, finding that the application, filed under Order XXI Rule 95 of the Civil Procedure Code, was after a period of one year. Aggrieved over the same, the respondent/auction purchaser filed a Civil Revision Petition in CRP (NPD)No.1958 of 2004. This Court, by Order dated 18.07.2014, dismissed the Civil Revision Petition and confirmed the order passed by the Executing Court. 4. While dismissing the Civil Revision Petition, in Paragraphs 15 and 16 of the order, this Court recorded the submis...
Tamilvannan Vs. The District Collector, Office of the District Collect ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the fourth respondent to conduct survey relating to the Petitioners land measuring an extent of 1500 sq.ft in S.No.557/8 in Plot No.27, Thuvakudi Village, Trichy Taluk on the basis of his representation dated 27.6.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. There is no representation for the Petitioner. 2. Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondents and upon hearing his submission, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, he had submitted a representation, dated 02.06.2016 before the Respondents, wherein, he had sought for the conduct of survey in respect of his land in S.No.557/8 in Plot No.27, Thuvakudi Village, Trichy Taluk. 5. At this stage, it comes to be known that the Petitioner had remitted the necessary charges ...
Sakthi Vs. Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
N. Kirubakaran, J. 1. G. Janakiraman, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the 1st respondent. 2. The petitioner is the tenant in respect of the 3rd and 4th floors of Old Door No.107, New Door No.146, Habibullah Road, Thiyagaraya Nagar, Chennai 17 under the 2nd respondent by virtue of a lease deed dated 01.07.2012. The 3rd respondent is owning basement, first floor and second floor of the same building. For non payment of the water and sewerage charges to the tune of Rs.10,38,496/- by the 3rd respondent, the 1st respondent has sought to disconnect the water connection to the premises in which the petitioner is occupying. It is the contention of the petitioner that they have already paid the statutory dues with respect to water and sewerage connection. However, the water connection to the entire building was disconnected on 01.07.2016 without any prior notice. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. Heard Mr. P. Valliappan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G. Janak...
Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Ltd. represented by its Director Ajay B ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to call for the records in C.C. No.263 of 2015 now pending on the file of the XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai and quash the same.) 1. This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking to call for the records in C.C. No.263 of 2015, now pending on the file of the XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai and quash the same. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the seventh respondent-State. 3.1 On 05.09.2011, Mrs. P. Sankari, Drugs Inspector, Tondiarpet II Range, Zone I, Chennai, the respondent herein, visited the medical shop of one S. Serumathi and drew sample of CherryLab Cough Syrup B.No.ACLL-003,M/D:12/2010;E/D:11/2012; Mfd by: Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Ltd. (Unit) #31, Rajban Road, Nariwala, Paonta Sahib H.P., for analysis in terms of Sections 22 and 23 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (for brevity the Act...
P. Muthumuniyandi Vs. The District Collector, Madurai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to survey the Petitioner's land in Survey No.65/1 F6 for an extent of 50 cents situated at Nedungulam Village, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai and on the basis of his application dated 24.2.2016 and his representation dated 16.6.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, he had addressed a representation, dated 08.06.2016 to the District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Campus, Madurai District, wherein, he had prayed for measuring his property and fixing the boundaries and in this regard, had sought for issuance of a direction to the Surveyor Subburaj and the Village Administrative Officer Devika and Village Assistant Malaichamy. The same contents of the representation, dated 08.0...
N. Shankaramagalingam Vs. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st Respondent to consider the representation dated 22.12.2015 and pass appropriate orders in terms of the Circular No. 67 of IGR for cancellation of the documents registered on the file of the 3rd Respondent comprised in encumbrance certificate bearing Certificate No. 6680 of 2013 within the time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Heard the Petitioner, (party-in-person) and the Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. According to the petitioner, he purchased the property of housing lay out at 17/2, Sankarankovil Kazhumadai Main Road, at plot Nos.108 to 184, Cauveri Nagar, near DNC Hostel, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District bearing resurvey No.332/A1-3 acres and 9 cents (out of 10 acres and 47 cents, south side upper portion) and 332/A2-3 acres and 53 cents (out of 10 acres and 56 cents, upper portion), totally measuring 6 acres 52...
B. Hemanthraj Vs. The District Collector and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 6 to forthwith take necessary steps to remove all the illegal encroachments made by the 7th respondent, his men, agents, etc., and/or by any other person in the 30 feet public road, abutting which the petitioner's property bearing Plot No.3, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Thathankuppam, Villivakkam, Chennai 600 049 is situated.) Huluvadi G.Ramesh, J. 1. The petitioner seeks for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 6 to forthwith take necessary steps to remove all the illegal encroachments made by the seventh respondent, his men, agents, etc., and/or by any other person in the 30 feet public road, abutting which the petitioner's property bearing Plot No.3, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Thathankuppam, Villivakkam, Chennai 600 049 is situated. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader taking noti...
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
1. The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 120(B), 420, 406, 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.75 of 2016, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant is running orphanages and old age homes at Kanyakumari District. The petitioner and other accused persons promised to get sanction from the Government and received a sum of Rs.14,50,000/-. But subsequently, they did not get any amount from the Government and swindled money received from the de-facto complainant. When the same was demanded by the de-facto complainant, they threatened with dire consequences and complaint case has been registered. 3. When the matter was listed on 29.06.2016, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter adjourned today. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) submitted that the petitioner received...
Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. and Others Vs. The District Magistrate/District ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(W.P.No.23252 of 2016 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to dispose of the petition filed under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 in C.M.P.No.4959/2015/ E3 and to pass appropriate orders to take physical possession of the secured assets morefully described in the Schedule hereto and deliver the physical possession of the Schedule property to the petitioner Bank within the time fixed by this Hon'ble Court. Schedule of the Property All that piece and parcel of land situated at Registration District of Coimbatore and Sub-Registration District of Singanallur, Coimbatore Taluk, Upplipalayam Village, an extent in S.F.Nos.624(part), 623/1 and 2, 629 in this dry Acre 6.76 and the same converted into house sites with formation of roads and the layout in the name of S N V Garden got approval in District Planning Authori...
S. Arumugam, Deputy Manager (Marketing) (Retired), Chennai Vs. The Man ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer in W.P.No.17852 of 2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records which culminated in the proceedings bearing Ref.No.10147/Pers.IR.1/2010 dated 17.02.2016 of the first respondent which was served upon the petitioner on 02.03.2016 by confirming the order passed in Ref.No.4364/E3/10 dated 28.10.2010 of the second respondent quash both the orders and consequently direct the respondents to release the terminal benefits due and payable to the petitioner, which were withheld by the respondents and / or recovered from the petitioner, within a time to be stipulated by this Court.) Common Order 1. Heard the submissions of Mr.S.Kumaresan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner in both the Writ Petitions and that of Mr.Sathishrajan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first and second respondents. 2. By consent of both parties both the writ pe...
- ‹ Prev
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- Next ›
- Last »