Chennai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R. Kamalambal Vs. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Thanjavur D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to sanction education loan of Rs.4,21,740/- to the petitioner's daughter namely SIVARANJANI for pursuing her B.E (Information Technology Course) in Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram by considering the petitioner's daughter's educational loan application dated .......2015 and the petitioner's representation dated 09.02.2016 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. According to the petitioner, her husband died leaving behind her and her two daughters. It is her case that the whole family is depending upon her income and she is working as an Anganwadi worker, in Child Development Programme Department. From her meagre income, her family is leading a life in a poverty line. She is the only earning member of her family and her parents were also died. 3. The stand of the petitioner is that ...
E. Devaraj Vs. The District Collector, Theni Distict and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 and 4 herein(Tahsildar and Village Administrative Officer) to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 25.09.2014 and to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to investigate and rectify the mistakes in the village records like adangal, chitta and to direct the fourth respondent to maintain proper upkeep of the village records, more particularly, for S.No.498/2, S.No.538/3, S.No.461/d and S.No.301/1, Silvarpatti, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, the Village Accounts Book is to be maintained as per G.O.No.581, dated 3.4.1987. He owns lands in S.No. 498/2, measuring an extent of 0.72 acres in Patta No.998, S.No.538/3 Punja 0.180 Ares in Patta No...
Mani @ Surya @ Manikandan and Others Vs. State Rep. By The Inspector o ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila [Fast Track] Court, Erode, in S.C.No.25 of 2015 dated 17.08.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are Accused Nos.1 to 3 in S.C.No.25 of 2015 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Sessions [Fast Track] Court, Erode. They stood charged for various offences as detailed below ad>Charge NumberCharge(s) framed againstPenal provision under which charge framed1A1 to A3Section 460 of IPC2A3Section 302 of IPC3A1 and A2Section 302 r/w 107 of IPC4A1 to A3Section 394 of IPC The trial court, by judgement dated 17.08.2015, convicted all the three accused as detailed below:- ad>Rank of the AccusedPenal provision under which conviction recordedQuantum of Sentence ImposedA1 and A2Section 460 of IPCImprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a further period of two...
Vijay Baskar Vs. State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Adhambakkam Pol ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kancheepuram District at Chengalpattu, in S.C.No.119 of 2013 dated 28.10.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant, sole accused in S.C.No.119 of 2013 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Kancheepuram district at Chengalpattu, who, stood convicted for offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months has come up with this appeal, challenging the said conviction and sentence. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows: 2.1. The deceased in this case was one Vidhya, aged about 21 years. She had studied upto plus two. Her father died many years before her death. She was brought up by her mother and brother. She was residing with them at Parameswaran Nagar, Adhambakkam, Chennai. She was working in a browsing center kno...
V. Thenmozhi Loganathan and Others Vs. The Registrar, Central Administ ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: in W.P.No.25394/2015: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order dated 31.07.2015 in O.A.No.310/01069 of 2015 confirming the order of the 3rd respondent dated 21.07.2015 in so far as it assigns duty to the petitioner/Nursing Sister performing the duty as Staff Nurse (lower cadre) quash the same and consequently for a direction directing the 3rd respondent to follow equality in assigning duties among the Nursing Sisters.) A. Selvam, J. 1. These Writ Petitions are directed against the common order dated 31.7.2015 passed in O.A.Nos.310/01069/2015 to 310/01074/2015 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench. 2. The writ petitioners, as petitioners, have filed Original Application Nos.310/01069/2015 to 310/01073/2015 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, praying to set aside the order passed by the third respondent on 21.7.20...
Vetrivelan @ Sathiya Vs. State by Inspector of Police, Salem
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the judgment of the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Salem in S.C.No.87 of 2014 dated 04.03.2015. ) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.87 of 2014 on the file of the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Salem. He stood charged for offences under Sections 294(b) (2 counts) 449, 352 and 302 I.P.C. The trial Court convicted the accused for offences under Sections 449 and 302 I.P.C., and acquitted him from rest of the charges. The trial Court sentenced the accused to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 449 I.P.C., and to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. The trial Court ordered to run the above sentences concurrently. Challenging the said ...
Stalin Vs. The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance ofWrit of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to grant parole to petitioner's father Jacob, S/o.Masilamani, aged about 74 years, Convict, who is now confined in Central Prison, Trichy from 06.07.2016 to 18.07.2016.) 1. The writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to grant parole to the petitioner's father Jacob, S/o.Masilamani, aged about 74 years, Convict, who is now confined in Central Prison, Trichy from 06.07.2016 to 18.07.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. Brief Facts: 3. The petitioner's father, namely, Jacob was initially acquitted in connection with the case in C.C.No.31 of 1999 on the file of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam; that thereafter an appeal was preferred by the State before ...
A. Maharaja Vs. The Branch Manager, Dindigul District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation, dated 7.6.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the typed-set of papers of the Writ Petition to the effect that the writ petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
Ashok Acharya Vs. Heena Acharya
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeals against the judgment and decree dated 27-08-2015 in H.M.O.P.Nos.1051 of 2010 and 131 of 2011 on the file of the Principal Family Court, Coimbatore.) 1. These civil miscellaneous appeals are directed against the common order passed in H.M.O.P.Nos.131 of 2011 and 1051 of 2010 by the Principal Family Court, Coimbatore. 2. The appellant in C.M.A.No.343 of 2016, as petitioner has filed H.M.O.P.No.131 of 2011 on the file of the Trial Court under Section 13(1) (i-a) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 wherein the respondent in C.M.A.No.343 of 2016 has been shown as sole respondent. Likewise, the respondent in C.M.A.No.342 of 2016 as petitioner has filed H.M.O.P.No.1051 of 2010 under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 wherein the appellant in C.M.A.No.342 of 2016 has been arrayed as sole respondent. 3. The material averments made in the petition filed in H.M.O.P.No.131 of 2011 can be stated like thus: The marriage between the petitioner and res...
Kannan @ Tamilazagan and Another Vs. State rep by Inspector of Police, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram (Mahila Court), Coimbatore in S.C.No.208 of 2013 dated 29.04.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants / accused 1 and 3 in S.C.No.208 of 2013 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram (Mahila Court), Coimbatore. The second accused was one Mr.Swamiappan and the fourth accused was one Mrs.Renukadevi. The trial Court framed as many as five charges against the accused as detailed below: ad>Serial Number of chargeCharge(s) framed against Charge(s) framed under Section1A1 to A3449 of IPC2A1 to A3376 r/w 511 of IPC3A1 to A3392 of IPC4A1 to A3302 of IPC5A4414 of IPC During the pendency of the trial, the second accused Mr.Swamiappan absconded and therefore the case against him was split up and being tried separately. By judgment dated 29.04.2015, the trial Court, acquitted the fourth accused, however convicted these tw...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »