A. Maharaja Vs. The Branch Manager, Dindigul District

A. Maharaja vs The Branch Manager, Dindigul District

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jul 15, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1189833

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1189833
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: M. Venugopal
Decided On: Jul 15, 2016
Case Number: W.P.(MD)No. 12410 of 2016
Subject: Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Constitution

Key legal issue: Constitution

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A. Maharaja

Respondent

The Branch Manager, Dindigul District

Excerpt

(prayer: writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 7.6.2016 within the time stipulated by this court.) 1. the learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the typed-set of papers of the writ petition to the effect that the writ petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. 2. recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation, dated 7.6.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.)

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the typed-set of papers of the Writ Petition to the effect that the writ petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition.

2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties A. Maharaja vs The Branch Manager, Dindigul District Same Subject Constitution Same Judge M. Venugopal