Chennai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Panneerselvam and Others Vs. State rep by Inspector of Police, Coimbat ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore in S.C.No.40 of 2013 dated 30.07.2014.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are the accused 1 to 3 in S.C.No.40 of 2013 on the file of the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. They stood charged for offences under Sections 449 and 302 I.P.C. By judgment dated 30.07.2014, the trial Court convicted all the three accused under both the charges and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months for offence under Section 449 I.P.C. and to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- each in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months for offence under Section 302 I.P.C. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellants are before this Court with this ...
A. Mithun Chakravarthy Vs. K. Phaindra Reddy and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying this Court to punish the Contemnors/Respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and to punish them for their wilful and wanton disobedience and non compliance of the interim order passed by this Court in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 in W.P(MD)No.19928 of 2014, dated 9.12.2014.) 1. There is no representation on the side of the Petitioner at the time of calling of the matter. However, there is representation on the side of the Respondents 1 to 4. 2. It comes to be known that the Petitioner has focussed the instant Contempt Petition before this Court praying for passing of an order by this Court to punish the Respondents/Contemnors for their wilful and wanton disobedience and non- compliance of the interim order passed by this Court in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 in W.P(MD)No.19928 of 2014, dated 9.12.2014. Earlier, this Court, in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 in W.P(MD)No.19928 of 2014, dated 9.12.2015, filed by the Peti...
S. Santhalakshmi Vs. The Controller of Examinations Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to issue hall ticket to the petitioner (Roll No. 2K15077) and permit her to write all examinations including practical examinations for the 1st year M.B.B.S August 2016 examinations scheduled to be commenced from 01.08.2016.2 ) 1. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2.The petitioner claims that her parents as well as she belongs to Hindu 'Kurumans' Scheduled Tribe Community and such entry has been made in her all school records and the petitioner's father was also issued with community certificate dated 13.08.2014 by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvannamalai. The petitioner has passed the Higher Secondary Course and secured 1123 out of 1200 marks and even prior to that, for getting the community certificate, her father had applied to the District Collector, Thiruvannamalai and it was forwarded to the jurisdictional Revenue ...
Deepti Ahuja Vs. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority-cum- Inspecto ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings No.32813/P1/ 2015 dated 17.11.2015 passed by the first respondent confirming the order of the second respondent passed in Order No.3086/A1/2015 dated 04.06.2015, quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to complete the registration of the lease deed dated 06.04.2015 pending document No.P113/2015 within the time to be stipulated by this Court.) 1. The petitioner calls in question the order dated 17.11.2015 passed by the first respondent, confirming the order dated 04.06.2015 of the second respondent. By the said order dated 17.11.2015, the first respondent rejected the statutory revision preferred by the petitioner and directed her to pay the deficit stamp duty of Rs.5,34,788/- together with penalty of Rs.1,212/- as has been assessed by the second respondent in respect of the lease deed dated 06.04.20...
S. Mohan Vs. The District Collector, Pudukottai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to give electricity service connection to the petitioner house comprised in S.F.No.206/2 of Mattur Village, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukottai District.) 1. This writ petition has been filed for providing electricity connection to the petitioner herein. 2. The petitioner is said to be in possession and enjoyment of the house situated in S.F.No.206/2 of Mattur Village, Pudhukottai District. According to him, he has made a representation on 27.03.2016 to the third respondent herein seeking electricity service connection. Since the same has not been considered, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in similar circumstances, this Court has already considered the issue involved in the Writ Petition in W.P.(MD).No.3769 of 2013 with certain conditions. He further submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied, if a simil...
Arjunan Vs. Jayaprakash and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of India against the return of the plaint order of the learned Subordinate Judge (Senior Division),Kallakurichi passed in OSSR.No.12091 of 2015 dated 06.01.2016.) 1. Aggrieved over the order dated 06.01.2016 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi in un-numbered O.S.SR.No.12091 of 2015, the plaintiff has filed the above Civil Revision Petition. 2. The plaintiff has filed the un-numbered Suit in O.S.Sr.No.12091 of 2015 for the following reliefs:- (i) declaring the title of the plaintiff over the suit property and granting consequential injunction relief restraining the defendants, their men and agents from disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property by the plaintiff; (ii) declaring that the entire proceedings in O.S.No.359 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi, in favour of the 2nd defendant and its subsequent proceedings is null and void and not binding ...
A. Chinnaiyan Vs. The District Collector, Trichirappalli District, Tri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the third respondent from drawing the high tension line in the petitioners property in S.No.262 for an extent of 22 cents in Pirattiyur Village, Trichy West Taluk, Trichy District and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation dated 22.06.2016 made by the petitioner.) 1. This writ petition has been filed praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the third respondent from drawing the high tension line in the petitioner's property in S.No.262 for an extent of 22 cents in Pirattiyur Village, Trichy West Taluk, Trichy District and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation dated 22.06.2016 made by the petitioner. 2. Mr.M.Murugan, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for R.1 and 2 and Mrs.Srimathi, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice for the third respondent. 3. Considering the limited scope of the...
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd. Vs. Joint Com ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 18.09.2009 made in WP.No.4195 of 2006 by the learned Single Judge of this Court. Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 77 days in filing the writ appeal against the order passed by the High Court in WP.No.4195 of 2006 dated 18.09.2009.) Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant- Transport Corporation, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent - Joint Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation) and learned counsel for the second respondent - workman and perused the records. 2. The Appellant - Transport Corporation is on Appeal. This Writ Appeal is arising out of the order dated 18.09.2009 made in WP.No.4195 of 2006, wherein and whereunder, the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant - Transport Corporation, seeking approval for dismissal of the second...
S. Nalini Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Secretary to Governm ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent/State of Tamil Nadu to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 22.02.2014 seeking her release from prison under Article 161 of the Constitution.) 1. The petitioner is a life convict and she would state that she was convicted and sentenced to death in Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case and her conviction and sentence of death, awarded by the Trial Court for the offence under Section 120-B read with Section 302 IPC, was confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, vide order dated 11.05.1999 in Death Reference Case No.1 of 1998 etc. The sentence of death awarded to the petitioner was commuted to rigorous imprisonment for life by the first respondent under Article 161 of the Constitution of India on 24.04.2000. The petitioner would further state that the date of conviction was 28.01.1998 and her death sentence was commuted...
C. Subbiah Poosari Vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitabl ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the Petitioner's representation and to regulate the administration and payment of remuneration to Poosaries-Schedule of the Temple on the basis of his representation dated 22.1.2016 within the time to be fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondent. 4. It is the case of the Petitioner that his representation, dated 22.1.2016 addressed to the Second Respondent and another representation, dated 28.6.2016 addressed to the First Respondent are pending as on date, without any progress or disposal in the subject-matter in issue. Therefore the Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition before this Court. 5. In view of the above, this Court, at this stage, without dwelling deep into the merits ...