Chennai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anandhan Vs. Sub Inspector of Police, Sivagangai District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records and to set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Devakottai, in Cr.M.P.No.967 of 2016 in Crime No.54 of 2016, dated 01.04.2016 in so far as refusing to handover the two oxen to the petitioner herein.) 1. Ananthan, father of A4, namely Raja @ Rajaram, aggrieved by a portion of the property return order passed in Cr.M.P.No.967 of 2016, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Devakottai has directed this revision. 2. On 03.03.2016, on the Thathani Karur Main Road, it is alleged that Oxen are harassed by certain persons by running Rackla race. The Devakottai Taluk Police registered a case in Crime No.54 of 2016 against 19 persons. One of them is Raja(A4) son of revision petitioner. The police seized Rackla cart and two Oxen from A4. It become case property. A4 filed Cr.M.P.No.967 of 2016 on 01.04.2016 for the return of same. The learned Magistrate, by his ...
S. Kaliammal Vs. The District Collector, Pudukkottai District and Anot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to issue a Patta to the extent of 3.41.5, 0.40.0 Ares bearing Survey No.35 situated at Nanjai Mangudi Village, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukottai Distirct.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. No counter is filed. 3. According to the Petitioner, she is in possession of wet land bearing Sy.No.35, measuring about 3.41.5, 0.40.0 ares in door No.31, Mangudi Village, Poovattakudi Post, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. From the year 1987, she is in possession of the land and she is cultivating the said land ever since 30.09.1987. For every fasli, she had paid the amount demanded by the Government. As such, she is in possession and enjoyment of the land for the past 30 years. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that she had approached the first and second respondents several times seeking iss...
Arjun and Others Vs. The Inspector of Police, Soolakkarai Police Stati ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr. P.C. praying to call for the FIR pertaining to the case in Crime No.120 of 2016, on the file of the first respondent Police and quash the same.) 1. Section 482 Cr. P.C., saves inherent power of the Court. Such inherent power can be exercised either to prevent the abuse of the process of the Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. Invoking such inherent power, this petition has been filed to quash the proceedings on the ground that the continuance would amount to abuse of the process of the Court. 2. A case in Crime No.120 of 2016 has been registered under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323 and 324 IPC r/w Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002 by the 1st respondent against the petitioners. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners and the second respondent, appeared in person and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirm...
- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- Next ›