Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Vijayabharathi Vs. The District Collector, Madurai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-08-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to measure and demarcate the petitioner's lands in Survey Number 38/9A of Thuvariman Village, Madurai West Taluk, Madurai District within stipulated time as may be fixed by this Honourable Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The grievance of the Petitioner is that he had purchased a land in Sy.No.38/9A of Thuvariman Village, Madurai West Taluk, Madurai District, measuring an extent of 0.03.50 ares, for a valuable consideration from one M.Babunagalingam and four others by means of sale deed dated 04.06.2013. As a matter of fact, he mutated the patta in his name and thereby the said property is enjoyed by him and his legal heirs without any hindrance. 4. The plea taken by the petitioner is that various persons approached him to sell his property and they required him to measure the l...
T. Vijayaraj Vs. The Sub-Collector Gobichettipalayam Erode District.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation, dated 27.02.2016, and to pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.) 1. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2. The petitioner entered into service in the Revenue Department as Village Administrative Officer, on 08.02.2013. A trap was laid by the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Department, on 12.01.2016, for the alleged demand and acceptance of bribe, on the complaint given by one N.Karuppa Gounder. Thereafter, the petitioner was placed under suspension by the 1st respondent, on 13.01.2016. The grievance of the petitioner is that though, F.I.R. was registered on 11.01.2016 under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, no charge sheet has been filed and that the order of suspension was not reviewed...
Apple @ Sivaraman Vs. The State, Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Cudd ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2016
(Prayer: Appeal against the judgment, dated 27.06.2013, made in S.C.No.80 of 2012 on the file of Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore.) S. Nagamuthu, J.1. Appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.80 of 2012 on the file of learned Sessions Judge, Cuddalore. He stood charged for offences under Sections 392, 397 and 302 of IPC. The trial Court sentenced the accused to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of six months for the offence under Section 302 IPC; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of six months for the offence under Section 392 read with 397 IPC. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court, by way of this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows: 2.1. The deceased in this case was one Subramani. He was a r...
Malaiarasan Vs. Sub Inspector of Police Devakottai Taluk Police Statio ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-07-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records and to set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Devakottai, in Cr.M.P.No.964 of 2016 in Crime No.54 of 2016, dated 01.04.2016 in so far as refusing to handover the two oxen to the petitioner herein.) 1. In this revision, partial allowing of a property return petition is being challenged by the property owner. 2. In this part of the State, more particularly in Sivagangai District, Bull Race has become famous. It has also become famous for various legal battles that went upto the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Now, life of two oxen are involved in this case. Devakottai Taluk Police registered the case against the revision petitioner also as he is alleged to have inhumanly treated and harassed the oxen. As part of investigation, the Rekla Race Cart and two oxen were seized. 3. The revision petitioner moved the learned Judicial Magistrate, Devakottai, filing Cr.M.P.No.964 ...
Jeyalakshmi Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Madurai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-07-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records relating to the FIR in Crime No.123 of 2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to call for the entire records relating to the FIR in Crime No.123 of 2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), investigation is over and a final report has already been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Madurai on 25.02.2015 itself, which is not yet taken on file. 4. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed....
Oathaiyandi and Others Vs. The Secretary, Tamil Development, Charitabl ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-07-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to take necessary steps on the basis of the Petitioner's representation dated 8.2.2016 to conduct election for appointment of five Non-Hereditary Trustees, one of them shall be a woman, from amongst the 30 Pangalis of Nadar Community for Arulmighu Chidambareswarar Thirukkoil, Sri Vinayakar Kovil and Arulmighu Iyanthu Veethu Swamy Thirukkovil situated at Chettiapathu Village, Tiruchendur Taluk, Tuticorin District within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioners, this Court may pass necessary orders in directing the third respondent/The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Tirunelveli District to take necessary steps on the basis of their representation, dated 8.2.2016 t...
M. Sugumaran Vs. The Joint Commissioner (Education), Corporation of Ch ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2, to revoke the suspension of the petitioner and to pay the entire arrears of subsistence allowance payable to the petitioner from the date of suspension i.e. 12.11.2013 till date, by considering the petitioner's representations, dated 03.06.2015 and 04.01.2016, within a reasonable time to be fixed by this Court and to continue to pay the same without any default and forbearing the 3rd respondent from continuing with the enquiry until the subsistence allowance is paid in full. 1. This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2, to revoke the suspension of the petitioner and to pay the entire arrears of subsistence allowance payable to the petitioner from the date of suspension i.e. 12.11.2013 till date, by considering the petitioner's representations, dated 03.06.2015 and 04.01.2016, within a reasonabl...
Muthupandi Vs. State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Coimbatore Distr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeals filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Coimbatore Division, in S.C.No.303 of 2011 dated 17.12.2012.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the 1st Accused in S.C.No.303 of 2011 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Coimbatore Division. The 2nd Accused was one Singam. A1 stood charged for offence under Section 302 of IPC and A2 stood charged for offence under Section 302 r/w 34 of IPC. The trial court, by judgement, dated 17.12.2012, acquitted A2, but, however, convicted A1 for offence under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life [no fine was imposed]. Challenging the above said conviction and sentence, A1 is, now, before this court with this criminal appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:- The deceased in this case was one Mrs.Sudha @ Sudharani. She was the first wife of A1, the appellant...
S. Arockiam Vs. The Officer-in-charge, Reserve Bank of India, Chennai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-07-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to direct the third respondent to consider the Petitioner's representations dated 5.5.2016 and 2.6.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, he made a representation in writing before the second respondent in person on 5.5.2016 praying for 'statement of accounts' being provided to him and that he was ready to pay a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- in respect of his loan amount. Subsequently, on 2.6.2016, he made another representation (postal receipt shows 3.6.2016) addressed to the respondents 1 to 3, whereby and where-under, he had stated that he was not provided with 'statement of accounts' till date and in his account, there are some discrepancies and after rectifying the same, he is ready to ...
Pedraj and Others Vs. State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Tiruvallu ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-07-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants by the learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur, in S.C.No.210 of 2008 dated 29.07.2013.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are Accused Nos.1 to 8 in S.C.No.210 of 2008 on the file of the learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur. They stood charged for various offences as detailed below:- ad>Charge NumberRank of AccusedCharged under1A1 to A8Section 147 of IPC2A1 to A3 and A8Section 148 of IPC3A4Section 323 of IPC4A1 to A3 and A5 to A8Section 323 r/w 149 of IPC5A5Section 302 of IPC6A1 to A4 and A6 to A8Section 302 r/w 149 of IPC7A6Section 323 of IPC8A1 to A5, A7 and A8Section 323 r/w 149 of IPC9A5Section 323 of IPC10A1 to A4 and A6 to A8Section 323 r/w 149 of IPC11A7Section 324 of IPC12A1 to A6 and A8Section 324 r/w 149 of IPC13A2Section 323 of IPC14A1, A3 to A8Section 323 r/w 149 of IPC15A1, A3 and A8Section 336 of IPC16A2, A4 and A5 to A7Secti...
- ‹ Prev
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- Next ›
- Last »