Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Sankarasubbu Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Assistan ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-10-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent Na.Ka.No.69977/R2/2008 dated 25.07.2008 and quash the same and direct the respondents to grant Departmental Transfer to the petitioner in the cadre of Junior Assistant within the period stipulated by this Court and pass further orders as this Court may deem it fit.) S.S. Sundar,J 1. The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
Sivakumar Vs. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chennai an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-10-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to open the tender bid submitted by the Petitioner, dated 11.3.2016, in respect of Tamil Nadu Urban Road Infrastructure Project(TURIP) 2016-2017'' to be implemented in the third respondent Municipality and to proceed with the same in accordance with law.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The Petitioner in the main Writ Petition prays for passing of an order by this Court in directing the Third Respondent to open the tender bid submitted by him, dated 11.3.2016, in respect of Tamil Nadu Urban Road Infrastructure Project(TURIP) 2016-2017'' to be implemented in the Third Respondent/The Commissioner, Keelakarai Municipality, Ramanathapuram District, Virudhunagar District and to proceed with the same in accordance with law. 4. At this stage, the Learned Ad...
Vijayan Vs. The District Collector, Virudhunagar and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-10-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to release the petitioner's Sale Deed dated 30.03.2012 in P.No.28 of 2012 on the file of the second respondent forthwith to the petitioner after due registration as per the provisions of Registration Act and Circular issued by the Inspector General of Registration, Chennai dated 25.04.2012 vide his Letter No.18339/C1/2012.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to release the petitioner's Sale Deed, dated 30.03.2012, in P.No.28 of 2012, on the file of the second respondent forthwith to the petitioner, after due registration, as per the provisions of Registration Act and Circular issued by the Inspector General of Registration, Chennai dated 25.04.2012 vide his Letter No.18339/C1/2012. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has purchased the ...
Raja Vs. State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Red Hills Police Stati ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-10-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the judgment of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ponneri, by its judgment dated 01.04.2014 in S.C.No.211 of 2012.) S. Nagamuthu. J 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.211 of 2012 on the file of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ponneri. He stood charged for offence under Sections 302 and 398 I.P.C. By judgment dated 01.04.2014, the trial Court convicted and sentenced the appellant to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment 3 months for offence under Section 302 I.P.C., and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years for offence under Section 398 I.P.C Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:- The deceased in this case was one Mr.Mariya Rathinam. He was aged 86 years. He was re...
K.S.S. Raj Vs. A. Muthumari
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-10-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records relating to Crl.A.No.1 of 2015 in Crl.M.P.No.4719 of 2013 in M.C.No.76 of 2014 (Crl.M.P.No.1828 of 2010) on the file of the VI Additional District Court, Madurai and to set aside the same.) 1. R6 in M.C.No.76 of 2014 aggrieved by the imposition of certain conditions in allowing his Cr.M.P.No.4719 of 2013 in Cr.M.P.No.1828 of 2010 in M.C.No.76 of 2014, on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Judicial Magistrate, Madurai as confirmed by the learned VI Additional District Judge, Madurai, vide Judgment dated 06.11.2015, in C.A.No.1 of 2015, has directed this revision. 2. The revision petitioner's brother married the respondent, who is the petitioner in the petition filed under D.V.Act. It is pending before a learned Judicial Magistrate in Madurai. The revision petitioner is also related to the respondent as he being a brother of her husband. Their father Mr.Kathirvelu and mo...
M. Ramasamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-10-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 03.03.2016 and investigate the same and file a final report within the period specified by this Honble Court.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 03.03.2016, investigate the same and file a final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, enquiry has been conducted and it has been subsequently closed . He has further submitted that the closure report has already been sent to the petitioner through post. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the closure report has not yet been received by the petitioner. 5. In view...
S. Muniasamy Vs. The District Collector, Trichy and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-10-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents herein to return the amount of Rs.2 Crores and 40 Lakhs to the petitioner, which was seized by the third respondent on 17.03.2011 and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents herein to return the amount of Rs.2 Crores and 40 Lakhs to the petitioner, which was seized by the third respondent on 17.03.2011. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a Wholesale trader and his firm is registered with Commercial Tax Department. He further submits that he is an Income-Tax assessee. 3. It is the specific case of the petitioner that on 16.03.2011, he collected a sum of Rs.2 Crores and 40 Lakhs from his customers at Chennai and boarded an Omni bus. According to the petitioner, while the bus reached Trichy ...
Muthavalli, represented by M. Easak Sahib, Tiruvannamalai District Vs. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-10-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 04.03.2015 made in E.A.No.9 of 2015 in E.A.No.156 of 2014 in E.P.No.515 of 1982 in O.S.No.118 of 1976 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Polur.) 1. Challenging the fair and final order passed in E.A.No.9 of 2015 in E.A.No.156 of 2014 in E.P.No.515 of 1982 in O.S.No.118 of 1976 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Polur, the plaintiff has filed the above Civil Revision Petition. 2. The plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.118 of 1976 to declare that the suit property is a Wakf property and for possession of the same. After contest, the trial Court decreed the suit on 20.01.1979. Against which, the defendants preferred an Appeal in A.S.No.27 of 1979 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tiruvannamalai. The Lower Appellate Court also confirmed the judgment and decree of the trial Court and dismissed the suit. Against the judgments and decrees of the Courts below, the defe...
Sagunthala Vs. The Inspector of Police, T. Kallupatty Police Station, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-10-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records and order in so far as conditions No.1 and 4 imposed in Crl.M.P.No.4273 of 2015 in Crime No.18 of 2015 on the file of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur dated 02.12.2015.) 1. Aggrieved by certain alleged onerous condition issued in the property return order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur, Madurai District in Crl.M.P.No.4273 of 2015, petitioner has directed this revision. 2. In this case a mother-in-law named her son-in-law as accused. Mother-in-law alleged that her son-in-law is a cheat and in this connection a certain items of jewel and cash Rs.1,00,000/- has become case-property. A property return petition was filed in Crl.M.P.No.4729 of 2015 by the son-in-law. There was a rival claim from the mother-in-law/defacto complainant in Crl.M.P.No.4273 of 2015. In a common order, the Magistrate accepted the request of mother-in-law and dismissed of the...
Pavala Malliga Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Office C ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-10-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to effect necessary entries in respect of petitioner's property comprised in S.No.60/3 Sub Divided as 60/3 G admeasuring 3 Acres nunja lands situated at Aryamangalam Village Trichy District in the SLR Books (computerized) and A Register on the basis of petitioner's representation dated 10.03.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has given a letter, dated 03.06.2016, to the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and to that effect, he has also made an endorsement in the typed set of papers of the writ petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid letter and the endorsement so made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »