Sivakumar Vs. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chennai and Others

Sivakumar vs The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chennai and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jun 10, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190610

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1190610
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: M. Venugopal
Decided On: Jun 10, 2016
Case Number: W.P(MD)No. 9719 of 2016 & W.M.P(MD)No. 7720 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sivakumar

Respondent

The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chennai and Others

Excerpt

(prayer:writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying this court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the third respondent to open the tender bid submitted by the petitioner, dated 11.3.2016, in respect of tamil nadu urban road infrastructure project(turip) 2016-2017'' to be implemented in the third respondent municipality and to proceed with the same in accordance with law.) 1. heard both sides. 2. by consent of both sides, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. the petitioner in the main writ petition prays for passing of an order by this court in directing the third respondent to open the tender bid submitted by him, dated 11.3.2016, in respect of tamil nadu urban road infrastructure project(turip) 2016-2017'' to be implemented in the third respondent/the commissioner, keelakarai municipality, ramanathapuram district, virudhunagar district and to proceed with the same in accordance with law. 4. at this stage, the learned additional government pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 brings it to the notice of this court that the tender, dated 11.3.2016, scheduled to take place on 27.5.2016 at 3.30 p.m, was stopped for some administrative reasons and in this regard, the petitioner was informed through notice, dated 24.5.2016 in reference in na.ka.no.109/2016/ee1. furthermore, it is represented on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 that a fresh tender is called for on 4.7.2016 and in this regard, a notification was issued on 27.5.2016. 5. in view of the aforesaid fact, this court concludes that nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition. viewed in that perspective, this court closes the writ petition. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to open the tender bid submitted by the Petitioner, dated 11.3.2016, in respect of Tamil Nadu Urban Road Infrastructure Project(TURIP) 2016-2017'' to be implemented in the third respondent Municipality and to proceed with the same in accordance with law.)

1. Heard both sides.

2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3. The Petitioner in the main Writ Petition prays for passing of an order by this Court in directing the Third Respondent to open the tender bid submitted by him, dated 11.3.2016, in respect of Tamil Nadu Urban Road Infrastructure Project(TURIP) 2016-2017'' to be implemented in the Third Respondent/The Commissioner, Keelakarai Municipality, Ramanathapuram District, Virudhunagar District and to proceed with the same in accordance with law.

4. At this stage, the Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents 1 and 2 brings it to the notice of this Court that the tender, dated 11.3.2016, scheduled to take place on 27.5.2016 at 3.30 p.m, was stopped for some administrative reasons and in this regard, the Petitioner was informed through notice, dated 24.5.2016 in reference in Na.Ka.No.109/2016/Ee1. Furthermore, it is represented on behalf of the Respondents 1 and 2 that a fresh tender is called for on 4.7.2016 and in this regard, a notification was issued on 27.5.2016.

5. In view of the aforesaid fact, this Court concludes that nothing survives for adjudication in the present Writ Petition. Viewed in that perspective, this Court closes the Writ Petition. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Sivakumar vs The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Ch... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge M. Venugopal