Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. S. Jaquilin Goldi Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secreta ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-14-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the second respondent to approve the appointment of the petitioner as Assistant Professor in Botany in the fourth respondent College with effect from 20.08.2001 instead of 10.08.2006 with all monitory benefits on the basis of the petitioner s representation dated 06.04.2008 followed by the remainder dated 23.04.2014.) 1. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the second respondent to approve the appointment of the petitioner as Assistant Professor in Botany in the fourth respondent College with effect from 20.08.2001 instead of 10.08.2006 with all monitory benefits on the basis of her representation dated 06.04.2008 followed by the remainder dated 23.04.2014. 2. According to the petitioner, she initially worked as Substituted Lecturer in Botany between 19.08.1999 and 18.08.2001. Thereafter, she was appointed as Lecturer in Botany by the four...
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, School Education Depar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-14-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order dated 27.01.2016 made in W.M.P(MD)No.1480 of 2016 in W.P(MD)No.1711 of 2016.) Nootyramamohana Rao,J. It is brought to our notice that by an order passed on 02.03.2016, the Honourable Division Bench of this Court, which entertained Writ Appeals in W.A(MD)Nos.291 of 2016 etc batch, dealing with a similar interim order passed by a learned Single Judge, as was the present case has considered and followed an earlier Division Bench judgment dated 5.2.2016 in W.A.(MD) No.220 of 2016 and concluded the issue by directing that the first respondent/writ petitioner therein shall be given salary for having been employed and that no steps shall be taken to remove the individual from service till the disposal of the writ petition. But, however the writ petitioner therein was ordered that he shall not claim any equity on account of any such arrangement and held that grant of interim order for approval of the appoint...
Rajeswari Vs. The Commissioner, Corporation of Madurai, Madurai and An ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-14-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to survey the Petitioner's property situated in T.S.No.74, Block No.95, Ponmeni Village, Madurai by considering the Petitioner's representation dated 28.3.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, he purchased a landed property situated at T.S.N o.74, Block No.95, in Ponmeni Village, Madurai and soon after the said purchase, he made an application before the First Respondent/The Commissioner, Corporation of Madurai, Anna Maaligai, Madurai, to survey the property. 4. The stand of the Petitioner is that he is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property ever-since the date of purchase. All the revenue records concerning the property stands in his name. The land in question measures an extent of 2668 sq.fts and it is not...
Mariammal Vs. The District Collector, Theni and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-14-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to survey petitioner's land and place the survey stones comprised in S.No.477/1C to an extent of 2200 sq.ft. situated at Shanmugasundarapuram Village, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2016 within a time frame as fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. It is the stand of the petitioner that he had made a representation to conduct the survey and place the survey stone in his property comprising Survey No.477/1C situated at Shanmugasundarapuram Village, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District. It appears that till date no positive steps have been taken by the second respondent/Tahsildar, Antidpatti. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that he had addressed a representation dated 27.01.2016 in person to the second respondent...
D. Roselin Joyce Vs. Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Rep. B ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-14-2016
(Prayer: W.A. No.1425 of 2015 filed against the order dated 17.2.2015 passed by the learned single Judge in W.P. No.21539 of 2014.) Common Judgment: (Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J.) This batch of writ appeals have been filed by the petitioners as well as the respondents in the writ petitions against the respective portion of the order passed by the learned single Judge. While W.A. Nos.1425 to 1434 of 2015 have been filed by the petitioners, W.A. Nos.360 to 369 of 2016 have been filed by the respondents in the writ petition against the order passed by the learned single Judge. 2. The appellants in W.A. Nos.1425 to 1434 of 2016, who are the petitioners, filed the writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents/authorities to regularise the service of the petitioners by fixing them in the scale of packers regularly employed in the respondent Corporation after making their service permanent with all consequential benefits. 3. The Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (...
Sarpudeen Vs. The State through the Sub Inspector of Police, Earvadi D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-14-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records and set aside the impugned order passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Special Court for E.C. And NDPS Act cases, Pudukkottai in Crl.M.P.No.1941 of 2015 in Crime No.122 of 2015 dated 16.04.2016.) 1. Aggrieved by the dismissal of his property return petition in Cr.M.P.No.1941 of 2015, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Special Court for E.C. and NDPS Act Cases, Pudukkottai, the petitioner has come forward with this revision. 2. Earvadi Dharga Police registered a case in Crime No.122 of 2015. In this connection a YAMAHA FAZER TN 65 L 0617 has been seized by the police. The revision petitioner is the registered owner of the vehicle. He filed Crl.M.P.No.1941 of 2015 under Section 451 Cr.P.C. and sought for interim custody of the property. 3. learned Special Judge passed the impugned order which runs as under: The learned Special Public Prosecutor argued that if t...
K.P. Jeyapaul Asan Vs. The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Che ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-14-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first and second respondents to dispose the petitioner's appeal dated 13.08.2015 in respect of cancellation of patta and to take legal and penal action against the officers those who violated the law while granting patta based on forged sale deed without hearing the petitioner within a stipulated time fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the act of Revenue Officials granting patta to the accused for the land sold under forged sale deed without providing an opportunity to the petitioner is against the natural justice. Further that all the Revenue Officials are liable to be punished under Indian Penal Code and also liable for departmental proceedings. 4. It appears that the petitioner made a representation on 17.03.2015 to the respondents 1 and...
Adakkappan Poosari Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai Distr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-14-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to dispose the revision petition filed by the petitioner on 12.12.2014 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 14.11.2015 within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The limited relief sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition is for passing of an order by this Court in directing the respondent to dispose of the revision petition, dated 12.12.2014, filed by the petitioner, on the basis of his representation dated 14.11.2015, addressed to the respondent /District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai within a time to be determined by this Court. 4. Admittedly, the revision petition dated 12.12.2014, filed by the petitioner is pending for consideration on the file of the District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai. Till date, the said r...
R. Gowrishankar Vs. The Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals)-I, Chenn ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order dated 22.02.2016 in W.P.No.5194 of 2016.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this appeal is to an order, made in W.P.No.5194 of 2016, dated 22.02.2016, passed by the Writ Court, declining to set aside the order made in the condone delay petition filed by the petitioner to condone 223 days in filing the appeal before the Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals)-I, Chennai, 1st respondent herein. 2. Short facts leading to the appeal are that the appellant suffered an Order in Original No.114 of 2010, dated 29.10.2010, passed by the Additional Commissioner of Service Tax, Service Tax II Commissionerate, Chennai, 2nd respondent herein, by which, he has disallowed CENVAT Credit of Rs.13,51,316/- and Rs.1,26,776/- and demanded the same from the appellant, vide Show Cause Notice No.122/09, dated 03.04.2009 and No.23/2009, dated 28.07.2009 respectively, under Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, r/w. Section 73(1) ...
Kotti @ Kottiswaran Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Thiruvot ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal has been preferred to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by judgment dated 26.06.2012 made in S.C.No.62 of 2011 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Ponneri.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.62 of 2011 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ponneri. He stood charged for offences under Sections 302 and 380 IPC. The Trial Court, by judgment dated 26.06.2012 convicted him under both the charges and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life (no fine is imposed) for offence under Section 302 IPC and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years for offence under Section 380 IPC (no fine is imposed). Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:- The deceased in this case was one Mrs.Baby Ammal @ Subramaniya Baby Ammal, aged about 70 years. She was residing...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »