Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mariammal Vs. The District Collector, Theni and Another

Mariammal vs The District Collector, Theni and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jun 14, 2016
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190537

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P.(MD)No. 4893 of 2016
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mariammal

Respondent

The District Collector, Theni and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to survey petitioner's land and place the survey stones comprised in s.no.477/1c to an extent of 2200 sq.ft. situated at shanmugasundarapuram village, andipatti taluk, theni district, based on the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2016 within a time frame as fixed by this court.) 1. heard both sides. 2. by consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. it is the stand of the petitioner that he had made a representation to conduct the survey and place the survey stone in his property comprising survey no.477/1c situated at shanmugasundarapuram village, andipatti taluk, theni district. it appears that till date no positive steps have been taken by the second respondent/tahsildar, antidpatti. 4. the grievance of the petitioner is that he had addressed a representation dated 27.01.2016 in person to the second respondent/tahsildar, andipatti, theni district and paid necessary charges to conduct survey and place the stone. till date his representation has not met with any positive response. 5. in view of the fact that the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2016 is pending on the file of the second respondent/thasildar, andipatti, theni district, this court, in the interest of justice, fair play, directs the second respondent to look into the representation of the petitioner, dated 27.01.2016, in a fair, free and dispassionate fashion and to dispose of the said representation on merits within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. with the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to survey petitioner's land and place the survey stones comprised in S.No.477/1C to an extent of 2200 sq.ft. situated at Shanmugasundarapuram Village, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2016 within a time frame as fixed by this Court.)

1. Heard both sides.

2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3. It is the stand of the petitioner that he had made a representation to conduct the survey and place the survey stone in his property comprising Survey No.477/1C situated at Shanmugasundarapuram Village, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District. It appears that till date no positive steps have been taken by the second respondent/Tahsildar, Antidpatti.

4. The grievance of the petitioner is that he had addressed a representation dated 27.01.2016 in person to the second respondent/Tahsildar, Andipatti, Theni District and paid necessary charges to conduct survey and place the stone. Till date his representation has not met with any positive response.

5. In view of the fact that the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2016 is pending on the file of the second respondent/Thasildar, Andipatti, Theni District, this Court, in the interest of justice, fair play, directs the second respondent to look into the representation of the petitioner, dated 27.01.2016, in a fair, free and dispassionate fashion and to dispose of the said representation on merits within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the aforesaid observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial