Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sethupathi and Others Vs. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police St ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-07-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for records in C.C.No.224 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sivagangai and quash the charge sheet and consequential further proceedings so far as the petitioners are concerned.) 1. This petition has been filed to call for records in C.C.No.224 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sivagangai and quash the charge sheet and consequential further proceedings so far as the petitioners are concerned. 2. The petitioners herein are A4 to A13, who are facing prosecution in C.C.No.224 of 2015 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sivagangai for offences under Sections 498(A), 494 r/w 109 IPC altered into Sections 498(A) r/w 109 IPC. 3. It may be relevant to state the factual matrix of the case, which is as follows: i) On a private complaint lodged by one Vidhya / defacto complainant in C.M.P.10521 of 2012, learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sivagangai ordered i...
The Secretary to Government (Expenditure) Finance Department, Secretar ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2016
M. Venugopal, J. 1. The Appellant/Respondent has preferred the present intra court Writ Appeal as against the Order dated 28.04.2014 in W.P. No.11105 of 2014 passed by the Learned Single Judge. 2. The Learned Single Judge while passing the Order on 28.04.2014 in W.P. No. 11105 of 2014 (filed by the Respondent/Petitioner) at Paragraph Nos. 5 to 7 had observed the following:- "5. Now, taking the issue of non inclusion of the petitioner in the panel for promotion for the post of assistant Section Officer, from the letter of the Secretary to Government (Expenditure) dated 30.01.2014, it is crystal clear that the petitioner has not been included because of the currency of punishment of censure. This cannot be accepted for the reason that in The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Thanjavur Range v. V. Rani (2011 (3) CTC 129), a Full Bench of this Court has held that punishment of censure cannot be an impediment for promotion at all. There is no currency period of censure also. 6. In view of...
M.G. Sathiyamoorthy Vs. K. Ramalingam and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order passed in I.A.No.234 of 2014 in I.A.No.26 of 2013 in O.S.No.131 of 2010 dated 13.04.2015 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram.) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the leave of the Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition with liberty to approach the trial Court with an application for substituted service of notice on the respondents who have not been served with notice in I.A.No.26 of 2013. 2. Endorsement is recorded. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty as sought for is granted. No costs....
Devaneethi Vs. T. Sathiah and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decree of the I Additional Judge City Civil Court, Chennai dated 10.09.2014 made in I.A.No.12786/2011 in O.S.No.12139 of 2010. Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decree of the I Additional Judge City Civil Court, Chennai dated 10.09.2014 made in I.A.No.12785/2011 in O.S.No.12140 of 2010.) Common Order: 1. These two civil revision petitions have arisen out of a common order and decretal orders dated 10.09.2014 made in I.A.No.12786/2011 in O.S.No.12139/2010 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai and I.A.No.12785/2011 in O.S.No.12140/2010 on the file the same court. Both the applications were filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint in the respective suits. The learned trial Judge, after hearing both sides, dismissed both the applications and hence these civil revi...
R. Krsna Murtii, Rock Fort Paints and Chemicals, Pudukottai District V ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-07-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent made in Tho.Mu.S1/11525/2007/A2/Ko.Abi.P.T.No.271/A2/2007 dated 27.12.2007 which in the name of N.Darshinee and to quash the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. Since the party-in-person had not appeared on more than two occasions, time was granted. Today it is posted for dismissal. Even today none appeared. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed....
Vellore Citizens Welfare Forums Vs. Union of India rep. by its Secreta ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2016
(Prayer: in W.P.No.13433 of 1996: Petition initially filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, on the file of the Supreme Court of India, now transferred to the High Court of Madras as petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide wholesome clean drinking water to the people living in the villages being affected by the pollution in North Arcot District of Tamil Nadu and for directions. Prayer in W.P.M.P.No.11 of 2015: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to modify the Order dated 03.12.2014 passed in W.P.No.39722 of 2005 and M.P.No.204-206 of 2014 and direct the transfer work of the Loss of Ecology (Prevention and Payments of Compensation) Authority, Chennai along with the staff and records to the National Green Tribunal. Prayer in W.P.No.23291/2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a writ of mandamus (a) directing ...
Kumari and Others Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by its Secretary to ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the 2nd respondent in his office Ref.Memo No.1033/BCDFGISSSV/2015 dated 28.9.2015 against the petitioner's son namely Babu s/o.Settu, aged about 23 years at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this Court and set him at liberty.) M. Jaichandren, J. 1. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the mother of the detenu, namely, Babu, aged 23 years, son of Settu, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records in office Ref.Memo No.1033/BCDFGISSSV/2015 dated 28.9.2015, passed by the 2nd respondent, detaining the detenu, under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexu...
Lakshmi and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-07-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 herein to initiate statutory action against the respondents 3 to 6 herein for excommunicating the petitioner and here family from her house and the village and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. On 24.03.2016, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence the matter was ordered to be posted on 06.04.2016 under the caption 'for dismissal'. 2. Even today when the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed....
The General Manager Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Puduk ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and decree dated 26.02.2015 passed in M.C.O.P.No.513 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal , Principal District Judge, Perambalur.) S. Vaidyanathan, J. 1. The Insurance Company has preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal challenging the Judgment and decree dated 26.02.2015 passed in M.C.O.P.No.513 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal , Principal District Judge, Perambalur. 2. It is a case of fatal accident. On 01.03.2013, when the deceased Pandi Mari was riding his Hero Honda Two Wheeler motorcycle bearing Registration No.TN 63-U-9726 on Thirumayam-Rangiyiam road on the extreme left side, at about 01.20 p.m., when he was proceeding at the place near Bairavar Koil at Mela Thurvasapuram, the Government Bus, bearing Registration No.TN-01-N-4005 belonging to the respondent, which was proceeding on the above said road from Ponnamaravath...
Kalaiselvi Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by its Secretary to Govern ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus calling for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the 2nd respondent dated 2.11.2015 in his office Ref.C3.D.O.No.107/2015 against the petitioner's son by name Raja @ Vasoor Raja, s/o.Arumugam aged about 30 years, now confined at Central Prison, Salem, Salem District and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the above said detenu before this Court and set him at liberty.) M. Jaichandren, J. 1. The petitioner, who is the mother of the detenu herein, namely, Raja @ Vasoor Raja, son of Arumugam, aged 30 years, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 2.11.2015 against her son branding him as a "Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor had submitted that the order of detention passed by the 2nd respondent as against the s...
- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- Next ›
- Last »