Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lakshmi and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Others

Lakshmi and Others vs The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 07, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191582

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P(MD) Nos. 3868 of 2012 & 16063, 16395 & 16895 of 2013 & M.P(MD) Nos. 1 of 2012 & 1 & 2 of 2013
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lakshmi and Others

Respondent

The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying this court to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 herein to initiate statutory action against the respondents 3 to 6 herein for excommunicating the petitioner and here family from her house and the village and pass further orders as this court may deem fit and proper.) 1. on 24.03.2016, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence the matter was ordered to be posted on 06.04.2016 under the caption 'for dismissal'. 2. even today when the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. no costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 herein to initiate statutory action against the respondents 3 to 6 herein for excommunicating the petitioner and here family from her house and the village and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.)

1. On 24.03.2016, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence the matter was ordered to be posted on 06.04.2016 under the caption 'for dismissal'.

2. Even today when the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial