Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G. Sureshbabu Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 05.03.2016 and to file the final report before the concerned court within the time stipulated by this Honble Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 05.03.2016 and to file the final report before the concerned court within the time stipulated by this Honble Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 05.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 05.03.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall b...
M/s. Jayaraj Karz, Rep. by its Partner P. Jeyasuresh Jayaraj, Trichy V ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in TIN No.33333463198/2013-14 dated 02.03.2016 and quash the same as it is unlawful and in violation of the principles of natural justice and further direct the respondent to re-consider the objections in all perspective on its merits along with the application dated 22.03.2016 filed under Section 84 of the TNVAT Act, and then pass an appropriate order in accordance with law and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in TIN No.33333463198/2013-14 dated 02.03.2016 and quash the same as it is unlawful and in violation of the principles of natural justice and further direct the respondent to re-consider the objections in all perspective ...
Sneha Manimurugan Vs. Secretary, Medical Council of India and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
1. The Appellant/Petitioner has preferred the instant Writ Appeal as against the order dated 18.02.2016 in W.P. No. 30328 of 2015 passed by the Learned Single Judge. 2. The Learned Single Judge, while passing the impugned order on 18.02.2016 in W.P. No. 30328 of 2015, had observed that the 1st Respondent/Medical Council of India, by a Communication in Ref. No. MCI-34(41)/2015-Med./146560 dated 29.10.2015 [for the letter in Ref. No. AC(l)/28843/2014-1 dated 07.08.2015 of the Registrar of the 3rd Respondent/University], had, inter alia, stated as follows: "... The Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 1997 requires two years of regular and continuous study of PCB/Bio-technology taken together and English with the stipulated percentage of marks. The criteria relating to two years of regular and continuous study is not fulfilled. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to pursue MBBS course based upon studying/passing Biology as additional subject from NIOS in April, 2014 and thereafter...
Sakthi @ Sakthivel and Another Vs. State, rep. by The Inspector of Pol ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal appeals preferred under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the judgement dated 28.02.2013 passed by the II Additional District Judge, Erode, in S.C.No.169 of 2011.) Common Judgment S. Nagamuthu,J. 1. The appellant in Criminal Appeal No.425 of 2013 is the first accused, the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.348 of 2013 is the second accused and the appellants in Criminal Appeal No.352 of 2013 are the accused 3 and 5, in Sessions Case No.169 of 2011, on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Erode. Including these appellants, there were a total number of 9 accused. The trial Court framed as many as six charges against all the nine accused as detailed below: Sl.No.Charges (Section of law) accused1.U/s.148 of the Indian Penal CodeA1 to A3 and A4 to A72U/s.302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal CodeA1 to A33.U/s.307 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal CodeA1 to A5, A8 and A94.U/s.307 of the Indian Penal CodeA1 to A45.U/s.302 read with Section 149 of the India...
V. Kannan Vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowme ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus against the respondents herein to take necessary action with respect to the representation of the petitioner dated 05.06.2014 and further consequently direct the third respondent to conduct the festivals in Arulmigu Mariyamman Temple, Sivarakottai, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District under his supervision or any other order of this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Mandamus against the respondents herein to take necessary action with respect to the representation of the petitioner dated 05.06.2014 and further consequently direct the third respondent to conduct the festivals in Arulmigu Mariyamman Temple, Sivarakottai, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District under his supervision. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner brought to the notice of this Court t...
M. Ramya Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st Respondent to instruct the 2nd Respondent to register the case on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 23.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st Respondent to instruct the 2nd Respondent to register the case on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 23.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 23.02.2016 has been sent by post to the 2nd respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 23.02.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a c...
K. Sellam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District and A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case against the accused on the complaint dated 06.03.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case against the accused on the complaint dated 06.03.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.46 of 2016. 3. In view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P and others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC).In case of closure of ...
S. Arockiyam Vs. State Represented by The Commissioner of Police, Madu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the Inspector of Police, Tallakulam Police Station, Madurai City / the 2nd respondent herein to register the petitioner's complaint dated 09.03.2016 as an FIR within the stipulated period as prescribed by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the Inspector of Police, Tallakulam Police Station, Madurai City/the 2nd respondent herein to register the petitioner's complaint dated 09.03.2016 as an FIR. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 09.03.2016, it essentially appears to be a money dispute. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. 4. Therefore, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
Jeyasingh Vs. State represented by The Superintendent of Police, Thoot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case and investigate on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 8.3.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case and investigate on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 8.3.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 08.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 3rd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 08.03.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise. With th...
Madurai Taluk Fisherman Co. Operative Society (South) a2407, Madurai a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.829/E/15-3/2015 dated 02.09.2015 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondents to lease out the fishery right in favour of the petitioner's Society for the period 2015 to 2018 in Perungudi Tank, Perungudi, Thiruparankundram, Nilaiyoor taluk, Nilaiyoor, Thiruparankundram, Ayyavaithaan, Ayanpappakudi, Madurai (South) Viradhanoor Taluk, Virdadhanoor, Madurai District.) Common Order 1. In these two cases, a G.O has been issued in respect of 126 tanks in Madurai. As far as the petitioner is concerned, the petitioner has challenged in respect of four tanks claiming the property. 2. It is always open for the petitioner to participate in the auction as per the Division Bench judgment of this Court in W.P(MD)No.5813 of 2008 dat...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »