Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S. Arockiyam Vs. State Represented by The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City and Another

S. Arockiyam vs State Represented by The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 12, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191510

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 5066 of 2016
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S. Arockiyam

Respondent

State Represented by The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the inspector of police, tallakulam police station, madurai city / the 2nd respondent herein to register the petitioner's complaint dated 09.03.2016 as an fir within the stipulated period as prescribed by this honourable court.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the inspector of police, tallakulam police station, madurai city/the 2nd respondent herein to register the petitioner's complaint dated 09.03.2016 as an fir. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the state. 3. on reading of the complaint dated 09.03.2016, it essentially appears to be a money dispute. hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an fir. 4. therefore, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the Inspector of Police, Tallakulam Police Station, Madurai City / the 2nd respondent herein to register the petitioner's complaint dated 09.03.2016 as an FIR within the stipulated period as prescribed by this Honourable Court.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the Inspector of Police, Tallakulam Police Station, Madurai City/the 2nd respondent herein to register the petitioner's complaint dated 09.03.2016 as an FIR.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.

3. On reading of the complaint dated 09.03.2016, it essentially appears to be a money dispute. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR.

4. Therefore, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial