Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C. Shanthi Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Common Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 01.01.2016 and investigate and proceed with the same as per law within time frame fixed by this Honourable Court and pass such further or other orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 01.01.2016 and investigate and proceed with the same as per law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State and perused the materials placed on record. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 01.01.2016, it is alleged by the petitioner that she received a free patta for her land sometime in the year 2001 and that the Tahsildar is giving false information to his higher officers in order to usurp the said land....
Murugan and Others Vs. State, rep.by The Inspector of Police, Salem Di ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal appeals preferred under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the judgement dated 14.08.2013 passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Salem, in S.C.No.155 of 2012.) Common Judgment S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are the accused 1 to 6, in Sessions Case No.155 of 2002, on the file of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Salem. The trial Court framed charges against the accused as detailed below: Sl.No.Charges (Section of law)accused1.U/s.148 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Properties (Damages and Loss) Act 1992A12.U/s.148, 324 and 302 r/w.149 of the Indian Penal CodeA23.U/s.148 and 302 r/w.149 of the Indian Penal CodeA3 to A6 By judgement dated 14.08.2013, the trial Court convicted all the six accused under these charges and sentenced them as follows: Sl.No.Rank of accusedConvictionsentence1.A1 to A6U/s.148 of the Indian Penal Coderigorous imprisonment for two years each. A2U/s.324 of the...
Deepika Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint dated 28.03.2015, investigate the same and to file a final report.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint dated 28.03.2015, investigate the same and to file a final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 28.03.2015 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 28.03.2015. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance wi...
Meera and Another Vs. The Inspector of Police, Tuticorin District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.1420/2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to complete the investigation and to file a final report in Crime No.460 of 2013 on the file of the respondent. Prayer in W.P.(MD) No.14882/2015: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from seizing the jewels on the absence of the accused from the petitioner which is unconnected with the Crime No.460 of 2013 on the file of the respondent herein and thereby render justice.) 1. The petition in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.1420 of 2016 has been filed to direct the respondent to complete the investigation and to file a final report in Crime No.460 of 2013 on the file of the respondent. The prayer in the writ petition in W.P.(MD) No.14882 of 2015 is to forbear the respondent from seizing the jewels on the absence of the accused from the petitioner which is unconnected with the Crime ...
A. Madasamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the matter purely civil in nature which is pending adjudication before the competent civil court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner by interfering in the civil issue relating to money dispute forthwith. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would, on instructions from the respondent police, submit that on the complaint given by one Thambiraj against this petitioner, a petition enquiry in CSR No.59 of 2016 was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. 3. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
Muthukumar @ Kumar and Others Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 16.2.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 16.2.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 16.02.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. 3. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
K.R. Raviselvan Vs. State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Thennilai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6319 of 2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent police to expedite the investigation in Crime No.129 of 2012 dated 26.09.2010 and file the Final Report within a stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court.) (Prayer Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6680 of 2016: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to transfer the case in Crime No.129 of 2012 (originally on the file of Thennilai Police Station) which is now pending on the file of the 2nd respondent to any other impartial investigating agency or investigating officer in the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police or Additional Deputy Superintendent of Police.) 1. The minimum facts that are required for deciding these petitions are as follows: 2. On the complaint alleged by one Raviselvan, Thennilai Police registered a case in Crime.No.129 of 2012 on 26.09.2012 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 447, 294(b), 324, 307, 506(ii) and 379 IPC and Section 3 of t...
Gopalakannan @ Mohanakannan and Others Vs. State rep. by the Inspector ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal appeals preferred under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 20.12.2012, made in S.C.No.370 of 2008, on the file of the Court of III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Salem.) Common Judgment: M. Sathyanarayanan, J. 1. The appellant in C.A.No.134/2013, is A-1; the appellant in C.A.No.30/2013, is A-3; the appellant in C.A.No.118/2013, is A-4; the appellants in C.A.No.69/2013, are A-6 and A-8 respectively; the appellant in C.A.No.99/2013, is A-7 and the appellants in C.A.No.121/2013, are A-10 and A-11 respectively, in S.C.No.370 of 2008, on the file of the Court of III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Salem. 2. The appellant in C.A.No.98/2013 viz. A-5, is no more and the appeal as against him, came to be dismissed as abated vide order dated 21.3.2016. 3. There were totally 13 accused in the above said Sessions Case, and they were charged and tried for the commission of offences, the details of which are given as under:- ad>...
Loganathan Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu represented by its Secreta ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeals preferred under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the orders dated 29.02.2016 and 04.03.2016 passed in W.P. Nos.4521 and 8043 of 2016 respectively.) Common Judgment: Satish K. Agnihotri, J. These intra-Court appeals are focussed against the orders dated 29 February 2016 and 04 March 2016 passed in W.P. Nos.4521 and 8043 of 2016 respectively. 2. Inasmuch as the issues involved in these intra-Court appeals are intertwined and there being no difference even in the arraignment of parties, both the intra-Court appeals are considered and decided by this common judgment. To avoid verbosity, the parties are referred to as per their litigative status in the instant intra-Court appeals. 3.1. The incontrovertible facts in a nutshell, leading to preferring of these intra-Court appeals are that the appellant joined the Kilpauk Medical College, Chennai as Scientific Assistant on 14 April 2008. On 23 July 2011, his services were regularised with effect from the date of his...
The Young Men's Christian Association, Madurai and Others Vs. M. Solom ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the records relating to the Order of interim injunction in I.A.No.153 of 2016 in O.S.No.264 of 2016 dated 12.04.2016 on the file of the Court of Madurai Town District Munsiff Judge, at Madurai to set aside the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition challenges the order in I.A.No.153 of 2016 in O.S.No.264 of 2016 on the file of the Madurai Town District Munsiff Judge. In O.S.No.264 of 2016, plaintiff, a member of the first defendant association has sought a declaration that the resolution dated 23.12.2015 extending the office of the 5th defendant as General Secretary beyond 62 years is illegal and void and to the resolution dated 23.12.2015 appointing the 6th defendant as Assistant General Secretary, a post nonest as per the bye-law is illegal and void and to pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining the 5th and 6th defen...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »