C. Shanthi Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District and Others

C. Shanthi vs The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 21, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191232

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1191232
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Apr 21, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 6030 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C. Shanthi

Respondent

The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District and Others

Excerpt

(common prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 01.01.2016 and investigate and proceed with the same as per law within time frame fixed by this honourable court and pass such further or other orders as this honourable court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 01.01.2016 and investigate and proceed with the same as per law. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the state and perused the materials placed on record. 3. on reading of the complaint dated 01.01.2016, it is alleged by the petitioner that she received a free patta for her land sometime in the year 2001 and that the tahsildar is giving false information to his higher officers in order to usurp the said land. 4. the complaint does not disclose the commission of a cognizable offence and in order to give a criminal colour to the allegation, the petitioner has stated that the village assistant came to the house of the petitioner and threatened her. the petitioner has not even given the date on which the alleged incident had taken place. hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an fir. 5. accordingly, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law.

Full Judgment

(Common Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3^rd respondent to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 01.01.2016 and investigate and proceed with the same as per law within time frame fixed by this Honourable Court and pass such further or other orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3^rd respondent to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 01.01.2016 and investigate and proceed with the same as per law.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State and perused the materials placed on record.

3. On reading of the complaint dated 01.01.2016, it is alleged by the petitioner that she received a free patta for her land sometime in the year 2001 and that the Tahsildar is giving false information to his higher officers in order to usurp the said land.

4. The complaint does not disclose the commission of a cognizable offence and in order to give a criminal colour to the allegation, the petitioner has stated that the Village Assistant came to the house of the petitioner and threatened her. The petitioner has not even given the date on which the alleged incident had taken place. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR.

5. Accordingly, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties C. Shanthi vs The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District an... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge P.N. Prakash