Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramasamy and Another Vs. State by, The Inspector of Police, Cuddalore ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the judgment rendered by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Cuddalore in S.C.No.301 of 2012 dated 04.09.2013.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are the accused 1 and 2 in S.C.No.301 of 2012 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Cuddalore. They stood charged for offences under Sections 498A, 294(b) and 302 r/w 34 I.P.C. By judgment dated 04.09.2013, the trial Court convicted them for offence under Section 302 r/w 34 I.P.C., alone and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the accused 1 and 2/appellants are before this Court with this Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:- The deceased in this case was one Mrs.Ezhilmathi. She was married to one Mr.Ranganathan, who is the son of the accused herein, eight year...
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Chennai and Others Vs. ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause XV of Letters of Patent, against the interim order of this Court, dated 27.10.2016 in W.M.P.(MD)No.1468 of 2016 in W.P.(MD)No.1706 of 2016.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. In the present writ appeal, the challenge made is to the order passed by the Writ Court, directing the appellants to grant temporary approval for appointment of the first respondent as a Secondary Grade Teacher, in the second respondent School and to pay salary to her from the date of her appointment, till the date of disposal of the writ petition. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the parties in the appeal, have consented that, they are agreeable that the order passed in W.A.(MD) No.220/2016 dated 05.02.2016, be passed in the present appeal also, details of which are given below. Thus, by consent, the present appeal is taken up and disposed of. 3. On an earlier occasion, a similar Writ Appeal (MD) No.220 of 2016, filed by the State, has been considered and disposed of on 05.02.2016 by ...
S. Varadharajan and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukott ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case in pursuant to the complaint given by the petitioner date 14.03.2016 against the said Perumal and Chellappa.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case in pursuant to the complaint given by the petitioner date 14.03.2016 against the said Perumal and Chellappa. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending. 3. In view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall co-operate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with...
Shanmugam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District and A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner herein dated 04.03.2015 and investigate the same in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner herein dated 04.03.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 04.03.2016 has been sent by post to the 2nd respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 04.03.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance w...
S. Andi Vs. The Joint Director of Elementary Education (Administration ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.3404/Aa5/2012, dated 10.04.2015 and consequential impugned order on Appeal in Na.Ka.No.14524/D4/2015, dated 01.02.2016 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all service benefits.) 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order of dismissal dated 10.04.2015 passed by the second respondent, which was confirmed by the first respondent on 01.02.2016 rejecting his appeal . 2. The petitioner was appointed as Secondary Grade Teacher on 21.10.2004 and he was posted at Anna Nagar Vadakarai Panchayat Union Primary School, Tenkasi. While he was working as such, by an order dated 11.06.2002 of the second respondent, the petitioner was placed under suspension pending enquiry i...
S. Ramakrishnan Vs. Nagoor Meeral
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer:- The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 against the fair and decreetal order passed in R.C.A.No.4 of 2012 dated 12.06.2015 on the file of Rent Control Appellate Tribunal (Sub Court), Ambasamudram confirming the fair and decreetal order passed in RCOP.No.3 of 2008 dated 25.06.2012 on the file of the Rent Controller (Principal District Munsif), Ambasamudrram.) 1. The Civil Revision Petitions are filed against the fair and decreetal order passed in R.C.A.No.4 of 2012 dated 12.06.2015 on the file of Rent Control Appellate Tribunal (Sub Court), Ambasamudram confirming the fair and decreetal order passed in RCOP.No.3 of 2008 dated 25.06.2012 on the file of the Rent Controller (Principal District Munsif), Ambasamudrram. 2. The revision petitioner is respondent / tenant in RCOP.No.3 of 2008. The respondent is landlord, petitioner in the said RCOP. The respondent filed RCOP for eviction of petitioner from the...
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary to Government, School Ed ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: The Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the interim order of this Court, dated 08.12.2015 in M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2014 in W.P.(MD)No.13165 of 2014.) S. Manikumar, J. In the present writ appeal, the challenge made is to the order passed by the Writ Court, directing the appellants to grant temporary approval for appointment of the first respondent as a Secondary Grade Teacher, in the second respondent School and to pay salary to her from the date of her appointment, till the date of disposal of the writ petition. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the parties in the appeal, have consented that, they are agreeable that the order passed in W.A. (MD) No.220/2016 dated 05.02.2016, be passed in the present appeal also, details of which are given below. Thus, by consent, the present appeal is taken up and disposed of. 3. On an earlier occasion, a similar Writ Appeal (MD) No.220 of 2016, filed by the State, has been considered and disposed of on 05.02.2016 by a...
N. Mariappan Vs. Paramasivam and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer:This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 29.10.2015 made in Memo dated 29.10.2015 in AR.O.P.No.74 of 2013 on the file of Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli, and allow the above civil revision Petition and pass further orders as this court may deem fit and proper.) 1. This revision is filed to set aside the order dated 29.10.2015 made in Memo dated 29.10.2015 in AR.O.P.No.74 of 2013 on the file of Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli. 2. Petitioner challenges the order of learned Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli, refusing to record the memo filed by the petitioner in A.R.O.P.No.74 of 2013, dated 29.10.2015, the petitioner herein is the second petitioner therein. 3. In the light of the decision of this Court in Mangayarkarasi Apparels Private Limited, Bangalore and another -vs- Sundaram Finance Limited, Chennai, reported in (2002) 2 MLJ 444, this revision is not maintainable. 4. This civil revision pe...
S. Narayanan Vs. State represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Tir ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the Sub-Inspector of Police, Panakudi Police Station, Tirunelveli not to harass the petitioner under the garb of holding up an enquiry.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the Sub-Inspector of Police, Panakudi Police Station, Tirunelveli not to harass the petitioner under the garb of holding up an enquiry. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would, on instructions from the respondent police, submit that neither a case nor a petition enquiry is pending against this petitioner on the file of the respondent police. 3. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
Shyam Singh Vs. State rep. By the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ce ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w.Section 401 Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the order passed by the Learned III Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.328 of 2016 in C.C.No.9125 of 2007 dated 04.03.2016.) 1. The Revision Petitioner/A2 has preferred the instant Criminal Revision Petition as against the order dated 04.03.2016 in Crl.M.P.No.328 of 2016 in C.C.No.9125 of 2007 passed by the Learned III Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai. 2.The Learned III Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai, while passing the impugned order in Crl.M.P.No.328 of 2016 in C.C.No.9125 of 2007 on 04.03.2016 (filed by the Petitioner/A2 under Section 239 of Cr.P.C.,) at paragraphs 14 and 15 had observed the following: 14.There is no dispute that the disputed materials and the standard materials were sent to the Forensic Department has been returned by the Forensic Department, for the reason that standard materials received were entirely different from ...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »