Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

N. Mariappan Vs. Paramasivam and Others

N. Mariappan vs Paramasivam and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 21, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191216

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2718 of 2015 & M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N. Mariappan

Respondent

Paramasivam and Others

Excerpt

(prayer:this civil revision petition filed under article 227 of the constitution of india, to set aside the order dated 29.10.2015 made in memo dated 29.10.2015 in ar.o.p.no.74 of 2013 on the file of principal district judge, tirunelveli, and allow the above civil revision petition and pass further orders as this court may deem fit and proper.) 1. this revision is filed to set aside the order dated 29.10.2015 made in memo dated 29.10.2015 in ar.o.p.no.74 of 2013 on the file of principal district judge, tirunelveli. 2. petitioner challenges the order of learned principal district judge, tirunelveli, refusing to record the memo filed by the petitioner in a.r.o.p.no.74 of 2013, dated 29.10.2015, the petitioner herein is the second petitioner therein. 3. in the light of the decision of this court in mangayarkarasi apparels private limited, bangalore and another -vs- sundaram finance limited, chennai, reported in (2002) 2 mlj 444, this revision is not maintainable. 4. this civil revision petition shall stand dismissed. no costs. consequently, connected m.p.(md)no.1 of 2015 is also dismissed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer:This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 29.10.2015 made in Memo dated 29.10.2015 in AR.O.P.No.74 of 2013 on the file of Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli, and allow the above civil revision Petition and pass further orders as this court may deem fit and proper.)

1. This revision is filed to set aside the order dated 29.10.2015 made in Memo dated 29.10.2015 in AR.O.P.No.74 of 2013 on the file of Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli.

2. Petitioner challenges the order of learned Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli, refusing to record the memo filed by the petitioner in A.R.O.P.No.74 of 2013, dated 29.10.2015, the petitioner herein is the second petitioner therein.

3. In the light of the decision of this Court in Mangayarkarasi Apparels Private Limited, Bangalore and another -vs- Sundaram Finance Limited, Chennai, reported in (2002) 2 MLJ 444, this revision is not maintainable.

4. This civil revision petition shall stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 is also dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial