Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Soosai Antonysamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli Distri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register the case against the 4th to 11th respondents on the basis of complaint lodged by the petitioner dated 17.3.2016 with the 3rd respondent.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register the case against the 4th to 11th respondents on the basis of complaint lodged by the petitioner dated 17.3.2016 with the 3rd respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 17.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner k...
P. Meenachi Sundaram Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to file an FIR based on the complaint give to the 2nd respondent herein dated on 26.3.2016 and to file a final report u/s.173(3) of Cr.P.C and punish the then investigating officer who failed to do his duty wilful intention of not obeying the order of Honourable Apex Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to file an FIR based on the complaint give to the 2nd respondent herein dated on 26.3.2016 and to file a final report u/s.173(3) of Cr.P.C and punish the then investigating officer who failed to do his duty wilful intention of not obeying the order of Honourable Apex Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who would submit that the complaint dated 26.03.2016 has been sent by post to the 2nd respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person befo...
K. Vidhya Sankar Versuu The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul Distric ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 01.04.2016 and investigate the same and file a final report within the period specified by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 01.04.2016 and investigate the same and file a final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 01.04.2016, it essentially appears to be a property dispute between the petitioner and the opposite party. It is alleged by the petitioner that on 25.03.2016, he was assaulted by the opposite party, but the petitioner has not produced any wound certificate in support of the same. Under such cir...
G. Gajendran Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent particularly the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the conduct of investigation.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent particularly the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the conduct of investigation. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that a case in Crime No.58 of 2016 under Section 302 IPC has been registered and during investigation, it was found that this petitioner was in constant touch with the accused. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry conducted by the respondent police in order to trace out the absconding accused and during enquiry, he shall not be harassed. However, this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest, if he is involved in any cognizable offence. With the above direction...
N. Venkataraman Vs. The District Collector cum District Magistrate, Th ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or any Order or direction in the nature of a Writ calling for records pertaining to the 'No Objection Certificate' issued by the 2nd Respondent in R.C.No.1046/2013/C4 dated 11.09.2015 in favour of the 5th Respondent and quash the same and consequently directing the 5th respondent to drop installation, erection of its petrol bunk retail outlet of filling station at T.S.No.318A/1 of Kumbakonam Town.) 1. According to the petitioner, he is residing along with his family members in the address referred to in the Writ Petition for several years. While so, the fifth respondent is trying to erect and commission a retail outlet of fuel filling station in violation of law and rules enumerated under Petroleum Act and Petroleum Rules,2002 endangering life and safety of the petitioner and his family members. Further, the fifth respondent wit...
Preethi Vs. Kamaraj
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: This Transfer CMP is filed under Section 24 of CPC praying to withdraw the case in HMOP.No.218 of 2015 from the file of Sub Court, Kancheepuram and transfer the same to the file of Principal Sub-Court, Dindigul to be tried along with HMOP.No.9 of 2016, on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul.) 1. The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw the case in HMOP.No.218 of 2015 from the file of Sub Court, Kancheepuram and transfer the same to the file of Principal Sub-Court, Dindigul to be tried along with HMOP.No.9 of 2016. 2. The petitioner herein is the wife and the respondent is the husband. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 04.07.2014. A male child was born in the wedlock on 15.06.2015. After marriage, the respondent used to quarrel without any reason and treated the petitioner cruelly. The petitioner forced to leave the matrimonial home and she is residing at her parents house with her minor child. The responden...
M. Thirambal Vs. The State by, The Inspector of Police, Thiruppur Dist ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under section 374[2] Cr.P.C., against the conviction and sentence passed on the appellant by the judgment made in SC.No.138/2011 dated 07.09.2012 on the file of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is arrayed as the first accused in SC.No.138/2011 on the file of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode. Totally there are three accused. A1 and A2 stood charged for the offence u/s.302 IPC and A3 stood charged for the offence u/s.302 read with 34 IPC. By judgment dated 07.09.2012, the Trial Court acquitted A2 and A3 and convicted A1 for the offence u/s.302 IPC and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.100/-, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant/A1 is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:- [A] The deceased in this case, ...
Suguna Vs. Subramani and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer in CRP (NPD) No.3824 of 2013:-Civil Revision Petition (NPD) filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set-aside the fair and decreetal order made in I.A.No.130 of 2013 in I.A.No.140 of 2006 in O.S.No.192 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ponneri, dated 16.07.2013. Prayer in CRP (NPD) No.3825 of 2013:-Civil Revision Petition (NPD) filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set-aside the fair and decreetal order made in I.A.No.135 of 2013 in I.A.No.140 of 2006 in O.S.No.192 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ponneri, dated 16.07.2013.) 1. The suit in O.S.No.192 of 2000 was filed by the deceased-Subramani against deceased-Munusamy Naidu, seeking the relief of partition and separate possession. The said suit was decreed exparte on 25.02.2003. 1.1. On the death of Subramani on 27.04.2003, the second plaintiff, namely, the first respondent herein came to be impleaded, as the second plaintiff, on 25.10.2006. She filed an Ap...
Balakrishnan Vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Ramanathapura ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, against the order passed in M.C.O.P.No.396 of 2005, dated 21.11.2008, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Fast Track Court, Pudukkottai.) 1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the Award passed in M.C.O.P.No.396 of 2005, dated 21.11.2008, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Fast Track Court, Pudukkottai. 2. The appellant is claimant in MCOP.No. 396 of 2005. The appellant claimed a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- for the injuries suffered by him in the accident, that occurred on 17.10.2003. The Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.31,375/- as compensation. Not being satisfied with the said award, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed. 3. The facts of the case are as follows: (i) The appellant was riding pillion in motor cycle belonging to his friend on 17.10.2003. At the time, the bus belonging to respondent dashed against motor cycle from behind. The appellant ...
Chinnadurai Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent police not to interfere in the civil dispute and not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry without due process of law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police not to interfere in the civil dispute and not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry without due process of law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and perused the materials placed on record. 3. It is represented by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that, on the basis of the complaint given by the 3rd respondent against this petitioner, petition enquiry is pending. 4. The petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, he shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the r...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »