G. Gajendran Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District and Another

G. Gajendran vs The Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 22, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191178

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1191178
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Apr 22, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 6251 of 2016
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

G. Gajendran

Respondent

The Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the respondent particularly the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the conduct of investigation.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the respondent particularly the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the conduct of investigation. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned additional public prosecutor appearing for the state. 3. it is seen that a case in crime no.58 of 2016 under section 302 ipc has been registered and during investigation, it was found that this petitioner was in constant touch with the accused. therefore, the petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry conducted by the respondent police in order to trace out the absconding accused and during enquiry, he shall not be harassed. however, this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest, if he is involved in any cognizable offence. with the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent particularly the 2^nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the conduct of investigation.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent particularly the 2^nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the conduct of investigation.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

3. It is seen that a case in Crime No.58 of 2016 under Section 302 IPC has been registered and during investigation, it was found that this petitioner was in constant touch with the accused. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry conducted by the respondent police in order to trace out the absconding accused and during enquiry, he shall not be harassed. However, this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest, if he is involved in any cognizable offence.

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties G. Gajendran vs The Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni Di... Same Subject Education Same Judge P.N. Prakash