Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Joseph @ Ramanujam and Others Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed in S.C.No.178 of 2011, on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore dated 05.09.2013.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are the accused 1 to 4 in S.C.No.178 of 2011 on the file of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. They stood charged for offence under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC. By judgment dated 05.09.2013, the trial Court convicted them u/s 302 r/w 34 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each, [no default sentence was imposed]. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the accused/appellants are before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows: [a] The deceased in this case was one Mr.Hari @ Harikrishnan. P.W.1 is the brother and P.W.6 is the father of the deceased. They owned a land at Narasimhanaicken Palayam in Coimbatore District. The adjacent land was purch...
Azhagudurai Vs. State By Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C., to suspend the sentence of imprisonment passed in Spl. S.C.No.1 of 2016 dated 16.3.2016 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ariyalur and release the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal.) 1. The sole accused in the Special Sessions Case in Spl. S.C.No.1 of 2016 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ariyalur seeks suspension of his sentence of imprisonment. 2. In the said Court, after trial, while acquitting the accused under Section 450 IPC, the accused was convicted under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter POCSO Act) and sentenced him to undergo RI for 10 years and fine Rs.50,000/-, i/d 2 years SI. 3. The learned Judge also directed the payment of Rs.25,000/- out of the total fine amount as compensation under Section 357 Cr.P.C. He has also directed the District Legal Services Authority t...
S. Gunasekaran Vs. The Director, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
1. S. Gunasekaran, the petitioner herein came forward with this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking a direction to the respondent to register a criminal case based on his complaint dated 10.12.2015. 2. The petitioner belongs to Konthalam Village in Paramathi Velur Taluk in Namakkal District. One Senthil is the President of the Village Panchayat. The petitioner alleged that the said President being a public servant misused the panchayat/public funds in spending the amounts towards certain panchayat development activities. 3. Petitioner gave complaint dated 10.12.2015 to the respondent. Since there was no concrete action thereon, he came to this Court for a direction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 4. The respondent's side filed the status report. The matter is being enquired into by C.R.Boopathi Rajan, Inspector, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Namakkal District. 5. The said Senthil intervened by filing an M.P. through Mr.S.Thirumavalavan, Advocate. His Junior, Ram Senthil represented hi...
M. Gopalakrishnan Vs. State Represented by The Deputy Superintendent o ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Madurai to dispose of Crl.R.P.No.35 of 2015 and the connected petitions pending on its file within a time period to be fixed by this Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Madurai to dispose of Crl.R.P.No.35 of 2015 and the connected petitions pending on its file within a time period to be fixed by this Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. The respondent police registered a case in Crime No.152 of 2012 and after completing the investigation, filed a final report in C.C.No.53 of 2013 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur for various offences against nine accused. The accused filed an application under Section 239 Cr.P.C. for discharge, which was allowed by the learned Judicial Magistrate,...
R. Sathishkumar Vs. The Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Pudukottai Distri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to sanction education loan to the petitioner's son as per sanction letter of the first respondent dated 19.09.2015.) 1. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent would submit that the respondent bank has already sanctioned educational loan to the petitioner and will intimate the same to the petitioner within a period of one week. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs....
Renuka Manuel Vs. Mallika Surender
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
1. The plaint averments are as follows:- (a) The plaintiff and the defendant are the daughters and legal representatives of Late Tmt. Helen Dasan and Dr. A.J. Dasan. Tmt. Helen Dasan, the mother of the plaintiff and the defendant, died on 24.12.2004, and she was a Professor and Head of Post Graduate English Department at Stella Maris College and she left a Will dated 31.7.1983, and the original of the same, is in the custody of the defendant. The defendant is the elder daughter of Late Tmt. Helen Dasan and Dr. A.J. Dasan, and the plaintiff is their younger daughter. As per the Will dated 31.7.1983, executed by Late Tmt. Helen Dasan, her husband father of plaintiff and defendant viz. Dr. A.J. Dasan, was appointed as the Sole Executor and the property bearing New Door No. 29 (Plot No. 47), 2nd Cross Street, Trustpuram, Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024, was bequeathed in equal shares to the plaintiff and the defendant. (b) The defendant made a representation to the plaintiff that the supers...
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
M. Venugopal, J. 1. Heard both sides. 2. The Petitioners/Appellants/A1 and A2 have preferred the present Criminal Revision Petition as against the judgment dated 18.12.2015 in C.A.No.33 of 2014 passed by the Learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, modifying the judgment made in C.C.No.507 of 2012 dated 17.02.2014 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate-VII, Coimbatore. 3. It comes to be known that the trial Court in C.C.No.507 of 2012 had convicted the First Petitioner/A1 and sentenced him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of one year and further, directed him to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment of the fine amount, directed him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of one month in respect of the offence under Section 325 IPC. Insofar as the Second Petitioner/A2 is concerned, the trail Court convicted and sentenced him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of six months and further, directed him to pay a fine of Rs.1000...
D. Paulraj Vs. V.K. Balamurugan
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level) Madurai to expedite the case No.STC. No.316 of 2012 and to dispose the case within the time frame as fixed by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level) Madurai to expedite the case No.STC. No.316 of 2012 and to dispose the case within the time frame as fixed by this Honourable Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. It is seen that this case is pending from 2012 onwards and the 'B' Diary extract shows that on 04.09.2012, the complainant was present and the accused was called absent. On the said date, the petition filed under Section 317 Cr.P.C., was allowed. 4. Under such circumstances, this Court directs the Trial Court to complete the trial within four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this orde...
Samera Vs. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Pudukottai Distric ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to sanction the petitioner educational loan as set out in the Bonafide Certificate in Karpaga Vinayaga Dental Sciences, Chinna Kolampakkam, Kanchipuram District.) 1. The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to sanction the petitioner educational loan as set out in the Bonafide Certificate in Karpaga Vinayaga Dental Sciences, Chinna Kolampakkam, Kanchipuram District. 2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner has completed plus two with good marks. Thereafter, she joined first year BDS Course in Karpaga Vinayaga Institute Dental Sciences, Chinna Kolampakkam, Kanchipuram District. When the petitioner approached the respondent bank for availing educational loan on 09.10.2014, the respondent did not respond. Aggrieved against the same, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. ...
Nagamani and Others Vs. The District Collector, Madurai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent in his impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.14752/2007/C dated 03.08.2015 and quash the same as illegal and consequently forbearing the respondents from in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's Plot Nos.10,13,14,15,16 and 47 comprised in Old Survey No.994/1A, Ward No.5, Block No.33, T.S.No.116, Arappalayam Main Road, Madurai-625 016.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the proceedings dated 03.08.2015 of the third respondent and after quashing the same seek for a consequential order forbearing the respondents from in any manner interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property bearing Plot Nos.10,13,14,15,16 and 47 comprised in Old Survey No.994/1A, Ward No.5, Block No.33, T.S.No.116, Arappalayam Main Road, Madurai-625 016. 2. Th...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »