Skip to content

Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 26 2016

Laloo @ Lemon Anandaraj Vs. The District Magistrate, Puducherry

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2016

(Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records and to set aside the order dated 31.03.2016 passed in M.C.No.36 of 2016 on the file of the respondent.) 1. With the consent of both the learned counsel, the Criminal Revision Petition is taken up for hearing. 2. Heard both sides. No counter has been filed by the Respondent. 3. The Petitioner has preferred the instant Criminal Revision Petition before this Court as against the order dated 31.03.2016 in M.C.N.36 of 2016 passed by the District Magistrate, Puducherry. 4. The District Magistrate, Puducherry in M.C.No.36 of 2016 had passed the impugned order against the Revision Petitioner (u/s.144 Cr.P.C.,) and the same runs as under: WHEREAS, it has been made to appear to me that you have trivial and insignificant respect to the judiciary and rule of law and involved in various offences against public tranquility, offences against public and private property, offences affecting...


Apr 26 2016

R.S. Mani Konar Vs. V. Roselin Savio, The Inspector of Police, Anti La ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Apr-26-2016

(Prayer: This contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent herein for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13172 of 2015 dated 14.07.2015.) 1. This contempt petition has been filed for punishing the respondent herein for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13172 of 2015 dated 14.07.2015. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he lodged a complaint dated 09.05.2015 to the respondent police and since no action was taken, he filed Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13172 of 2015 for a direction to the respondent police to register an FIR on his complaint, in which, this Court passed the following order on 14.07.2015: These Criminal Original Petitions have been filed for a direction to the concerned respondents to register the case based on the petitioner's/petitioner's complaint. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on instructions, would submit that in...


Apr 26 2016

S. Petchiraja Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police (CBCID),Office o ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Apr-26-2016

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the Special Judge for PCR/SC and ST Act cases, Thoothukudi District to consider the bail application that will be filed by the petitioner in Crime No.2 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police on the same day of its filing.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the Special Judge for PCR/SC and ST Act cases, Thoothukudi District to consider the bail application that will be filed by the petitioner in Crime No.2 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police on the same day of its filing. 2. When this Court was not inclined to accept the prayer of the petitioner on merits, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 3. Permission is granted. This Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....


Apr 26 2016

Thangapandi Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District and ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Apr-26-2016

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to impugned Patta No.403 issued by the second respondent for the lands comprised in Survey No.604(1) and (2) situated at Oruthattu Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District in favour of the third respondent and quash the same consequently direct the second respondent to restore the patta for the above lands in the name of the petitioner as before and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed....


Apr 26 2016

S. Jeevarathinam Vs. V. Balakrishnan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2016

(Prayer:Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to prefer the above Civil Revision Petition against the judgment and decree of the Learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam made in O.S.No.92 of 2010, dated 21.12.2011 in so far as it denied the costs of the litigation.) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. Accordingly, the Civil Revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....


Apr 26 2016

R. Arumugam Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Alankula ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Apr-26-2016

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi to complete the trial expeditiously in C.C.No.218 of 2015 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi to complete the trial expeditiously in C.C.No.218 of 2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. Taking into consideration the volume of cases on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, this Court cannot issue a time bound direction to complete the trial. Under such circumstances, the Trial Court is directed to expeditiously complete the trial in C.C.No.218 of 2015....


Apr 26 2016

Nagalingam Vs. The Superintendent of Police and Another

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Apr-26-2016

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to expedite investigation in Cr.No.777 of 2015 dated 31.10.2015 and file a final report with in time prescribed by this Honourable Court in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the 2nd respondent to expedite investigation in Cr.No.777 of 2015 dated 31.10.2015 and file a final report with in time prescribed by this Honourable Court in accordance with law. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that if some more time is granted by this Court, the investigation would be completed and final report would be filed by the respondent before the concerned Court. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police to complete the investigation and to file a final report before the concerned jurisdictional Court as expedit...


Apr 26 2016

Amirthakani Vs. The District Collector, Madurai and Others

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Apr-26-2016

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent's impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.14752/2007/C dated 03.08.2015 and quash the same as illegal and consequently forbearing the respondents in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's plot No.11 comprised in Old Survey No.994/1A, Ward No.5, Block No.33, T.S.No.116, Arappalayam Main Road, Madurai-625 016 and to pas such further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent's impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.14752/2007/C dated 03.08.2015 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, forbear the respondents in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's plot No.11 comprised in Old Survey...


Apr 26 2016

B. Padmapriya Vs. Dr. S. Varadharajan and Others

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2016

(Prayer:This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., against the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bhavani in C.M.P.No.785 of 2014 in M.C.No.3 of 2014 dated 29.05.2014 and set aside the same by allowing the Criminal Revision Petition.) M. Venugopal, J. 1. The Learned counsel for the Petitioner has made an endorsement to the effect that he may be permitted to withdraw this Criminal Revision Petition . 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the present Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed....


Apr 26 2016

M/s. Texsyard International, Karur District Vs. The Assessment Commiss ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Apr-26-2016

(Prayers: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in its impugned proceedings made in TIN.33953660834/2012-13 dated 02.12.2015 and quash the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the second respondent in its impugned proceedings made in VAT Appeal No. and Year 266/2014 dated 16.02.2015 and quash the same as being violative of the principles of natural justice and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) Common Order 1. Since the issue involved in both the writ petitions is similar, they are taken up together for hearing and disposed of by this common order. 2. The first writ petition in W.P(MD)No.470 of 2016 has been filed challenging the assessment...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial