Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Thangapandi Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District and Others

Thangapandi vs The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 26, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191099

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P(MD)No. 14466 of 2013 & M.P(MD)No. 1 of 2015
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Thangapandi

Respondent

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying this court to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to impugned patta no.403 issued by the second respondent for the lands comprised in survey no.604(1) and (2) situated at oruthattu village, nilakottai taluk, dindigul district in favour of the third respondent and quash the same consequently direct the second respondent to restore the patta for the above lands in the name of the petitioner as before and pass further orders as this court may deem fit and proper.) 1. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. in view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to impugned Patta No.403 issued by the second respondent for the lands comprised in Survey No.604(1) and (2) situated at Oruthattu Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District in favour of the third respondent and quash the same consequently direct the second respondent to restore the patta for the above lands in the name of the petitioner as before and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.)

1. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial