Chennai Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Joseph Bright Singh Vs. M. Nelson and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Crl.O.P.(MD) 1862/2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the learned District and Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District to expedite the trial in Crl.Rev.No.23 of 2014 on the file of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. Crl.O.P.(MD) 1863/2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the learned District and Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District to expedite the trial in C.A.No.36 of 2014 on the file of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.) 1. These petitions have been filed to direct the learned District and Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District to expedite the trial in Crl.Rev.No.23 of 2014 and C.A.No.36 of 2014 pending on the file of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2. By order dated 03.02.2016, this Court had called for a report from the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagercoil, Kanyakuma...
Viswanathan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would, on instructions from the respondent police, submit that neither a case nor a petition enquiry is pending against this petitioner on the file of the respondent police. 3. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
Thennarasu Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Vellore
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the conviction and sentence passed by the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Vellore @ Thiruppathur, Vellore District, in S.C.No.83 of 2012 dated 02.08.2013.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.83 of 2012 on the file of the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Vellore @ Tirupathur, Vellore District. He stood charged for offence under Section 302 of IPC. By judgement dated 02.08.2013, the trial court convicted him under Section 302 and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. Challenging the same, the sole accused is now before this court with this criminal appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:- The deceased in the case was one Mrs.Indira. She was already married to someone else. She had two children, who are P.W.2 and P.W.4 and they were then min...
Abudhakir Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Ramnad District and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd Respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 04.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 04.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner's wife by name Asma, already a case in Crime No. 13 of 2016 for offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC has been registered. 3. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
R. Nanthini Vs. The Director General of Police and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No. 550 of 2015 pending on the file of the 4th respondent to the 5th respondent.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No. 550 of 2015 pending on the file of the 4th respondent to the 5th respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. it is seen that initially the case in Crime No.550 of 2015 under Section 174 Cr.P.C. has been registered and after investigation, an alteration report has been filed, including Section 306 IPC. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that A1 has been arrested and released on bail. As regards other accused, on account of their old age, they have been granted anticipatory bail by the Court. 4. This Court perused the Case Diary and found that the Postmortem ...
Russel Raj and Another Vs. Krishnamony and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal Order passed in I.A. No.459 of 2015 in O.S. No.168 of 2011 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai, dated 2.11.2015.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decretal Order passed in LA No.459 of 2015 in OS No.168 of 2011 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai, dated 2.11.2015. 2. The Revision Petitioners are the Plaintiffs. The Respondents are the Defendants. The Petitioners filed O.S. No.168 of 2011 for Permanent Injunction restraining the First Respondent from interfering with the affairs of Nattalam Arulmigu Sankaranarayanar Thirukovil and from disturbing any of its Poojas and functions to be performed during Pankuni Thiruvizha or on any other occasions. Subsequently, the Respondents 2 to 4 were impleaded as Defendants. The Fifth Respondent got himself impleaded as Fifth Defendant. 3. The ...
Idumban Vs. State by the Inspector of Police, Salem
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed u/s.374 Cr.P.C., against the judgment passed in SC.No.212/2012 dated 10.04.2012 by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Salem.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the first accused in SC.No.212/2012 on the file of the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Salem. There were three other accused in the case, viz., A2 to A4, who are the sons of the appellant herein. All the four accused stood charged for the offences u/s.302 r/w 34 IPC and A1 alone stood further charged for the offence u/s.323 IPC. By the Judgment dated 10.04.2013, the Trial Court acquitted A2 to A4 and convicted the appellant/A1 alone u/s.302 IPC and acquitted him from the charge u/s.323 IPC and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one year. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant/A1 is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief, ...
M.P.K. Venkatesan and Co, rep. by its Partner P. Vasumathi, Namakkal a ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: W.P.No.24779 of 2015 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the files of the first respondent in TNGST No.3200209/97-98 dated 25.05.2015 and quash the same as being contrary to the direction issued by this Court in W.P.Nos.2946 and 2947 of 2008 dated 05.02.2008 and that of the direction issued by the second respondent in A.P.No.41/2007 dated 12.06.2007.) (Prayer: W.P.No.24780 of 2015 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the files of the first respondent in TNGST No.3200209/98-99 dated 25.05.2015 and quash the same as being contrary to the direction issued by this Court in W.P.Nos.2946 and 2947 of 2008 dated 05.02.2008 and that of the direction issued by the second respondent in A.P.No.62/2007 dated 12.06.2007.) (Prayer: W.P.No.24115 of 2015 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying for i...
Anand Raj Vs. The Sub Divisional Magistrate-cum-Sub Collector, Tirunel ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings in M.C.No.(107) 04/2016 dated 08.01.2016 issued by the Sub Divisional Magistrate-cum-Sub Collector, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District and quash the same. 1. This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in M.C.No.(107) 04/2016 dated 08.01.2016 issued by the Sub Divisional Magistrate-cum-Sub Collector, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that this petition has been filed, challenging the show cause notice dated 08.01.2016, asking the petitioners to show cause as to why a bond for Rs.2,500/- should not be collected from them for maintaining peace. 4. Since this is only a show cause notice, this Court is not inclined to quash the entire proceedings of the 1st respondent. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner...
C. Jeyamani Lakshmi Vs. state rep by the Inspector of Police, Madurai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent and perused the materials placed on record. 3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that, on a complaint given by one Jeyapal against this petitioner, petition enquiry is pending before the respondent in CSR No.44 of 2016. 4. The petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, she shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of....
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »