R. Nanthini Vs. The Director General of Police and Others

R. Nanthini vs The Director General of Police and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Mar 02, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1192310

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1192310
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Mar 02, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 3709 of 2016
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

R. Nanthini

Respondent

The Director General of Police and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the 1st respondent to transfer the investigation in crime no. 550 of 2015 pending on the file of the 4th respondent to the 5th respondent.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to transfer the investigation in crime no. 550 of 2015 pending on the file of the 4th respondent to the 5th respondent. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the state. 3. it is seen that initially the case in crime no.550 of 2015 under section 174 cr.p.c. has been registered and after investigation, an alteration report has been filed, including section 306 ipc. learned government advocate (crl.side) submits that a1 has been arrested and released on bail. as regards other accused, on account of their old age, they have been granted anticipatory bail by the court. 4. this court perused the case diary and found that the postmortem doctor has referred a viscera report, which states that no poison has been detected in the visceral organs. thereafter, the postmortem doctor has given an opinion that the deceased appears to have died of cardiac respiratory arrest due to hanging asphyxia 5. in view of the above, this is not a fit case to transfer the investigation to cbcid and it will be in the interest of justice, if the case in crime no.550 of 2015 is ordered to be monitored by the superintendent of police, madurai. 6. accordingly, the superintendent of police, madurai / 2nd respondent herein is directed to monitor the investigation of the case in crime no.550 of 2015, pending on the file of the 4th respondent. the respondent police is directed to expedite the investigation and file a final report in accordance with law.. with the above direction, this criminal original petition is closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1^st respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No. 550 of 2015 pending on the file of the 4^th respondent to the 5^th respondent.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1^st respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No. 550 of 2015 pending on the file of the 4^th respondent to the 5^th respondent.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.

3. it is seen that initially the case in Crime No.550 of 2015 under Section 174 Cr.P.C. has been registered and after investigation, an alteration report has been filed, including Section 306 IPC. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that A1 has been arrested and released on bail. As regards other accused, on account of their old age, they have been granted anticipatory bail by the Court.

4. This Court perused the Case Diary and found that the Postmortem Doctor has referred a viscera report, which states that no poison has been detected in the visceral organs. Thereafter, the Postmortem Doctor has given an opinion that the deceased appears to have died of cardiac respiratory arrest due to hanging asphyxia

5. In view of the above, this is not a fit case to transfer the investigation to CBCID and it will be in the interest of justice, if the case in Crime No.550 of 2015 is ordered to be monitored by the Superintendent of Police, Madurai.

6. Accordingly, the Superintendent of Police, Madurai / 2^nd respondent herein is directed to monitor the investigation of the case in Crime No.550 of 2015, pending on the file of the 4^th respondent. The respondent police is directed to expedite the investigation and file a final report in accordance with law..

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties R. Nanthini vs The Director General of Police and Others Same Subject Criminal Same Judge P.N. Prakash