Chennai Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.L. Subramanian Vs. The District Revenue Officer
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to remove the sealed lock and hand-over the possession of the house property bearing Town Survey No.1014 situated at Door No.24, Mela Chithirai Street, Madurai City, Madurai to the Petitioner enabling him to hand over the possession to the purchaser by considering the representation dated 24.10.2016.) 1. The Petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondent to remove the sealed lock and hand-over the possession of the house property bearing Town Survey No.1014 situated at Door No.24, Mela Chithirai Street, Madurai City, Madurai to the Petitioner enabling him to hand-over the possession to the purchaser by considering the representation dated 24.10.2016. 2. Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent. 3. By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal, at the a...
S. Sivaraja Vs. The Conservator of Forests Chennai Circle Chennai and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders for granting regular permission for right of pathway for the petitioner to reach the patta land comprised in S.Nos.87/4, 87/6, 89/2, 94 and 97 Puduper Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District through the existing cart track running through the forest land and further to permit electricity connection to the patta land belonging to the petitioner by laying cable through the existing cart track, within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The present writ petition has been filed by Mr.S.Sivaraja seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders for granting regular permission for the right of pathway for the petitioner to reach the patta land comprised in Survey Nos.87/4, 87/6, 89/2, 94 and 97 Puduper Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District through the existin...
Pichammal Vs. Natarajan and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.45 of 2009 dated 25.03.2010 on the file of learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Kovilpatti, reversing the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.244 of 2005, dated 09.07.2009 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Kovilpatti.) 1. The plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.244 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kovilpatti, is the appellant in the above Second Appeal. 2. The appellant filed the suit in O.S.No.244 of 2005 for declaration that the suit second schedule property is a common lane and that for removal of encroachment made by the first defendant over the suit third schedule by putting up tin doors. 3. Along with the plaint, the plaintiff filed a rough sketch. It is the case of the plaintiff that the suit property is described as ABCD in the plaint plan and that the common lane is shown as ADEG which lies in between the property of the fir...
A. John Joseph Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to complete the proceedings within the time frame fixed by this Court and subsequently to direct the second respondent to cancel the patta in the name of the respondents 4 to 6 and issue patta in the name of the petitioner, Petitioner's mother and sisters relating to the properties in S.Nos.87/1E, 95/3C, 95/3F,95/3G, 85/9, Patta No.483, Thamaraipatti Village, Dindigul District.) 1. This Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner for a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by the Petitioner. 2. Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3. 3. By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself. 4. It is seen from the typed-set of papers that the appeal itself was filed only on 4.11.2016. ...
V. Malar Vs. The District Collector, Theni and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to sanction the educational loan to the Petitioner's daughter V.Malini for her B.E(Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering Course)at Karpagam College of Engineering, S.F.No.758, 759 and 760, Othakkal Mandabam, Coimbatore for the academic years 2016-2017, 2017-2018, 2018-2019 and 2019-2020.) 1. Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel takes notice for the second respondent/Bank. 2. By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself. 3. Though the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition is for sanctioning of educational loan to the Petitioner's daughter, the learned counsel for the Petitioner fairly submitted that the application for grant of such loan has not yet been given by the Petiti...
Bhanumathi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by its Secretary, Public Depart ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents No.1 to 3 to prosecute the delinquent police officials on the basis of a fair impartial investigation and to take criminal and departmental action against the Respondents No.4 to 6 consequentially to pay to the petitioner, compensation of a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only).) 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents No-1 to 3 to prosecute the delinquent police officials on the basis of a fair impartial investigation and to take criminal and departmental action against the Respondents No-4 to 6 consequentially to pay to the petitioner, compensation of a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) as compensation. 2. The case of the Petitioner is that the Petitioner in this writ petition is the mother of one Selvaraj w...
Thilagavathi Vs. The Deputy Commissioner, Commissioner of Labour, Madu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in Aa4/6017/14 dated 09.12.2015 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Madurai, quash the same and direct the respondent to pay the entire compensation to the writ petitioner and her children.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to quash the impugned order of the 1st respondent dated 09.12.2015 passed in Aa4/6017/14, by which, departmental enquiry has been conducted and the amount of Rs.5,75,720/- due to the deceased employee has been disbursed in proportion to his dependents, namely, wife of the deceased, mother of the deceased and father of the deceased, excluding his children, who attained majority. Challenging the said order, the petitioner is before this Court and the petitioner also sought a direction to the respondent to pay the entire compensation to her and her children. 2. The case of the petiti...
R. Neethi Vanan Vs. Commissioner of HR and CE Department, Nungambakkam ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, against the decree and judgment dated 18.07.2006 made in O.S.No.72 of 2005 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Thanjavur to set aside the same.) 1. Since there was no representation for appellant on 01.12.2016 and on 15.12.2016, this Court directed the office to post this appeal under the caption either for disposal on merits or for dismissal on 16.12.2016. Despite the matter is posted for disposal today, there is no representation for the appellant. Taking into consideration the fact that there was no appearance for the appellant consistently and consecutively for three hearings, this Court find that no useful purpose will be served by keeping this matter pending. Hence, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, there is no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed....
A. Deepika Vs. The Commissioner, Cumbum Municipality
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the Petitioner's application dated 14.11.2016 seeking to change the name of the Petitioner's child as AARUSH ARUNKUMAR'' INSTEAD OF ''A.AARUSH ARUN'' in the Birth Certificate within the period stipulated by this Court.) 1. The Petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondent to consider the Petitioner's application, dated 14.11.2016 seeking to change the name of the Petitioner's child as AARUSH ARUNKUMAR'' INSTEAD OF ''A.AARUSH ARUN'' in the Birth Certificate within the period stipulated by this Court. 2. Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent. 3. By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself. 4. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the above said application submitted by the Petitioner to change the name o...
C. Parvathammal Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Principal Sec ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd, 3rd and 8th respondents to reassignment an extent of 0.52.5 Hectare land comprised in Survey No.136/2 situated at Nellumara Agraharam Village, Thenkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District from the name of 9th respondent to in the name of petitioner based on the petitioner's representation dated 02.08.2016 as per the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act 1961 within a time frame limit.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by C.Parvathammal seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd, 3rd and 8th respondents to re-assign an extent of 0.52.5 Hectare land comprised in Survey No.136/2 situated at Nellumara Agraharam Village, Thenkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District from the name of 9th respondent to in the name of petitioner based on the petitioner's representation dated 02.08.2016 as per the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling ...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »