V. Malar Vs. The District Collector, Theni and Another

V. Malar vs The District Collector, Theni and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Dec 16, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1186408

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1186408
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: K. Ravichandrabaabu
Decided On: Dec 16, 2016
Case Number: W.P(MD) No. 24125 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V. Malar

Respondent

The District Collector, Theni and Another

Excerpt

.....the prayer sought for in this writ petition is for sanctioning of educational loan to the petitioner's daughter, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the application for grant of such loan has not yet been given by the petitioner to the second respondent/bank, since the said application was not furnished to the petitioner, in spite of making a request for the same. 4. the learned counsel for the second respondent/bank submitted that if the petitioner approached the second respondent/bank, the loan application will be furnished and as and when the application is submitted by the petitioner, the same will be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. 5. recording the above said submissions of the respective counsels, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to furnish the loan application to the petitioner within seven days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and with a further direction to the second respondent to consider the said application, if the same is furnished by the petitioner with relevant documents and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks thereafter. 6. with the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to sanction the educational loan to the Petitioner's daughter V.Malini for her B.E(Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering Course)at Karpagam College of Engineering, S.F.No.758, 759 and 760, Othakkal Mandabam, Coimbatore for the academic years 2016-2017, 2017-2018, 2018-2019 and 2019-2020.)

1. Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel takes notice for the second respondent/Bank.

2. By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself.

3. Though the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition is for sanctioning of educational loan to the Petitioner's daughter, the learned counsel for the Petitioner fairly submitted that the application for grant of such loan has not yet been given by the Petitioner to the second respondent/Bank, since the said application was not furnished to the Petitioner, in spite of making a request for the same.

4. The learned counsel for the second respondent/Bank submitted that if the petitioner approached the second respondent/Bank, the loan application will be furnished and as and when the application is submitted by the Petitioner, the same will be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.

5. Recording the above said submissions of the respective counsels, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to furnish the loan application to the petitioner within seven days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and with a further direction to the second respondent to consider the said application, if the same is furnished by the petitioner with relevant documents and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks thereafter.

6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties V. Malar vs The District Collector, Theni and Another Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge K. Ravichandrabaabu