Chennai Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Annamalai Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corp ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representations dated 26.01.2016 seeking to stop issuing new Local Cable TV Operator (LCO) registration for the Kadanganeri Village, Alangulam Taluk, Tirunelveli District.) V. Bharathidasan, J. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
Jeya Seelan Sundar Singh Samuel Vs. The Executive Engineer and Adminis ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in connection with the impugned order of the respondent in proceedings Lr.No.R5/1325/96/Relief G.O.115/2013 dated 05.07.2013 and quash the same as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondent to execute sale deed in respect of the house allotted to the petitioner bearing No.MIG-B-9 without insisting / demanding and excess amount in the name of difference in land cost, interest and maintenance charges etc.) 1. Challenging the notice issued by the respondent Housing Board directing the petitioner to pay the difference of land cost of Rs.1,46,147/- and also interest on the difference of land cost to a sum of Rs.1,71,344/-, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. According to the petitioner, the respondent Housing Board allotted MIG house to the petitioner, by an order dated 27.02.1997 and he has also executed a lease cum sale ag...
Jayalakshmiyammal Vs. Veerasamy (died) Gandhi Ammal and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against order and decreetal order in A.S.No.187 of 2003, on the file of Sub-Court, Villupuram and dated 30.09.2010 in confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.891 of 1990, on the file of I Additional District Munsif Court, Tirukoilyur and dated 24.02.2003.) 1. The defendants have preferred this second appeal, challenging the Judgement and decree dated 30.09.2010 made in A.S.No.187 of 2003 on the file of the Sub-Court, Villupuram, confirming the judgement and decree dated 24.02.2003 made in O.S.No.891 of 1990 on the file of the First Additional District Munsif, Court, Thirukoilyur. 2. The suit has been laid for Declaration, Permanent Injunction and for Recovery of Money. 3. The case of the plaintiffs is stated as follows: The suit property was purchased by the plaintiff from one Ramalinga Mudaliar for a valid consideration under the registered sale deed dated 29.11.1990 and pursuant to the said sale, the plai...
Puma Sports India Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru and Others Vs. Syed Layakl Ali, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. to set aside the order dated 14.12.2015 made in MP.No.6795 of 2015 on the file of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore @ Allikulam, Chennai.) 1. Both the Criminal revisions are directed against the order passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore @ Allikulam, Chennai made in MP.No.6795 of 2016 dated 14.12.2015. 2. Both the criminal revisions are preferred against the order passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore @ Allikulam, Chennai, on the complaint given by the respondent/complainant in MP.No.6795 of 2016 filed under Section 156(3) r/w.190 Cr.PC. 3. The order dated 14.12.2015 passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai which reads as follows :- "Forwarded to concern police for registered the case and necessary action and report by 18.01.2016." Aggrieved against the said impugned order, the present revision petitions are preferred by the acc...
D.K. Samy Vs. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable E ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned eviction notice caused by the 3rd respondent, dated 26.08.2016 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to regularize the super structure constructed by the petitioner at Old Survey No.121/16 and New Survey No.17-19 bearing Door No.68/16 of Sattur Town of Virudhunagar District by fixing fair rent.) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, a liberty is given to the petitioner to file a revision before the appropriate forum. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed....
J. Ameer Banu Vs. The General Manager, Southern Railways, Chennai and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to refund a sum of Rs.5,51,522.00 (Rupees Five Lakhs Fifty One Thousand Five Hundred Twenty Two only) (Amount of Sale Value after deduction of EMD) without any interest to the petitioner within the time span as fixed by this Court.) 1. This writ petition has been filed directing the respondents to refund a sum of Rs.5,51,522.00 (Rupees Five Lakhs Fifty One Thousand Five Hundred Twenty Two only) (Amount of Sale Value after deduction of EMD) without any interest to the petitioner within the time span as fixed by this Court. 2. According to the petitioner, her husband A.Jailani participated in the e-auction for removal of Railway scrap materials and he was the highest bidder for a sum of Rs.5,73,760/- and he also paid the entire amount and the auction was also confirmed and delivery order was also issued to him on 09.10.2014 by the second ...
P. Vellaisamy and Another Vs. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent's impugned order Na.Ka.No.3607/2008/Sa.Pa dated 02.05.2008 and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondents to pay the retirement benefits and other benefits payable to the petitioner.) 1. This writ petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent's impugned order Na.Ka.No.3607/2008/Sa.Pa dated 02.05.2008 and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondents to pay the retirement benefits and other benefits payable to the petitioner. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he worked as Salesman in Ration-Shop running under the third respondent bank. Originally, he was appointed on 05.09.1985 as temporary salesman and finally promoted as permanent salesman on 01.11.1990 through the resolution passed by the third respondent. The petitioner was retired o...
K. Neelavathi Vs. The Manager, UCO Bank
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the order passed in GEN :3:2016 dated 19.08.2016 on the file of the respondent herein and consequently direct the respondent to grant education loan to the petitioner for a sum of Rs.2,62,200/- (Rs.65,550/-x 4 years) (Rupees Two Lakhs Sixty Two Thousand and Two Hundred only) pursuant to the application dated 03.02.2016.) 1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order passed by the respondent bank, dated 19.08.2016, wherein the respondent bank refused the educational loan to the petitioner, and seeking consequential direction to the respondent to grant education loan to the petitioner for a sum of Rs.2,62,200/- (Rs.65,550/- 4 years) (Rupees Two Lakhs Sixty Two Thousand and Two Hundred only) pursuant to the application dated 03.02.2016. 2. Already this Court has passed an order in W.P(MD)No.9534 of 2016, dated 14.07.2016, on the admission mad...
P. Kanthimathi Ammal Vs. The Executive Engineer and Administrative Off ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in connection with the impugned order of the respondent in proceedings Lr.No.R5/1546/98/Relief G.O.115/2013 dated 05.07.2013 and quash the same as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondent to execute sale deed in respect of the house allotted to the petitioner bearing No.MIG-B-30 without insisting / demanding and excess amount in the name of difference in land cost, interest and maintenance charges etc.) 1. Challenging the notice issued by the respondent Housing Board directing the petitioner to pay the difference of land cost of Rs.2,31,271- and also interest on the difference of land cost to a sum of Rs.2,22,556/-, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. According to the petitioner, the respondent Housing Board allotted MIG house to the petitioner, by an order dated 17.04.1998 and he has also executed a lease cum sale ag...
G. Krishna Prasad @ Sameer Prasad Vs. G. Durga Devi and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 407 of Cr.P.C., to withdraw M.C.No.6 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Hosur and transfer the same to the III Additional Family Court, Chennai.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking a direction to withdraw M.C.No.6 of 2013 from the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Hosur and to transfer the same to the III Additional Family Court, Chennai. 2. The first respondent herein/Durga Devi was married to the petitioner/Krishna Prasad on 20.09.2009 and it appears that they have one daughter through the wedlock. Her name is said to be Vedha. Due to the strange behaviours of Durga Devi, the petitioner has filed HMOP.No.737 of 2013 for divorce and the case is pending before the III Additional Family Court, Chennai. 3. The first respondent has filed HMOP No.145 of 2013 before the Sub Court, Hosur for restitution of conjugal rights and pursuant to which, the petitioner had filed C.M.P...
- ‹ Prev
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- Next ›
- Last »