Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

D.K. Samy Vs. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District and Others

D.K. Samy vs The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Nov 07, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1187430

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P.(MD)No. 17241 of 2016 & W.M.P(MD)No. 12507 of 2016
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

D.K. Samy

Respondent

The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned eviction notice caused by the 3rd respondent, dated 26.08.2016 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to regularize the super structure constructed by the petitioner at old survey no.121/16 and new survey no.17-19 bearing door no.68/16 of sattur town of virudhunagar district by fixing fair rent.) 1. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. in view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. however, a liberty is given to the petitioner to file a revision before the appropriate forum. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned eviction notice caused by the 3rd respondent, dated 26.08.2016 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to regularize the super structure constructed by the petitioner at Old Survey No.121/16 and New Survey No.17-19 bearing Door No.68/16 of Sattur Town of Virudhunagar District by fixing fair rent.)

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, a liberty is given to the petitioner to file a revision before the appropriate forum. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial