Chennai Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pricol Limited, Coimbatore Vs. ---
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petitions filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 to sanction the Scheme of Amalgamation.) Common Order 1. These company petitions are preferred under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for sanctioning the scheme of amalgamation of the transferor company with the transferee company with effect from 01.04.2015. The scheme of amalgamation (in short scheme) is appended as Annexure '3' to the petitions. 2. The petitioner in C.P.No.258 of 2016 is the transferor company and the petitioner in C.P.No.259 of 2016 is the transferee company. 3. A perusal of the records show that the petitioners have complied with the prescribed procedure. It is stated that the transferor company has six (6) secured creditors. A certificate of the Chartered Accountant confirming the same is appended as Annexure '8' to C.P.No.258 of 2016. 3.1. It is seen that the above-said secured creditors of the transferor company have given their consent to the proposed Scheme, which are ...
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
M. Venugopal, J. 1. Heard Mr.N.Anand Venkatesh, Learned counsel for the Petitioner/Appellant and Mr.B.Ramesh Babu, Learned Public Prosecutor for the Respondent/Complainant. 2. The Petitioner/Appellant/Accused has preferred the present Criminal Appeal before this Court, as against the Judgment dated 28.09.2016 in S.C.No.162 of 2015 passed by the Learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. 3. It transpires that the Petitioner/Appellant/Accused was found guilty under Section 304(ii) I.P.C. although he was charged under Section 302 I.P.C. and was convicted and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of five years and further, he was directed to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-, in default of payment of fine, he was also required to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of three months. 4. Before the trial Court, in the main case, on behalf of the Prosecution, witnesses P.W.1 to P.W.12 were examined and Exs.P.1 to P.16 were marked. Also, Exs.M.O.1 to M.O.10 were ...
P. Uma Vs. The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 3 and 4 herein to sponsor the name of the petitioner under the SCA(ICM-Priority Category) for the post of Graduate Assistant (Zoology) and consequently directing theRespondents 1 and 2 herein to appoint the petitioner as Graduate Assistant (Zoology) under the SCA (ICM-Priority) Category among the existing 294 vacancies now available with the 2nd respondent department as per the petitioner's seniority vide Employment Registration No. W/3202/03/96 dated 28/10/2003.) 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 3 and 4 herein to sponsor the name of the petitioner under the SCA(ICM-Priority Category) for the post of Graduate Assistant (Zoology) and consequently directing the Respondents 1 and 2 herein to appoint the petitioner as Graduate Assistant (Zoology) under the SCA (ICM-Priority) Category amo...
Sahayadhas Vs. The Secretary, Public Work Department, Secretariat, For ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to grant Rs.20,94,503/- to the petitioner for the construction work done by the petitioner, on the basis of representation dated 12.03.2012. Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent to grant Rs.7,46,266/- to the petitioner for the construction work done by the petitioner, on the basis of representation dated 12.03.2012.) Common Order 1. In both the writ petitions, the petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the respondent department to grant Rs.20,94,503/- and Rs.7,46,266/- respectively to the petitioner for the construction work done by him, on the basis of his representations dated 12.03.2012. 2. Heard Mr.F.Deepak, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Aairam K.Selvakumar, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of th...
The Rameswaram Vattara Kalanjiam rep. by its President, Vs. The State ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to conduct enquiry on the basis of the representation, dated 30.1.2012, preferred by the petitioner on behalf of the Society, consequently to take necessary action against the respondents those, who have illegally occupied the office of the Rameswaram Vattara Kalanjiam situate at No.12/42, Vannan Street, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District and handover thesame to petitioner for better administration within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry on the basis of the representation, dated 30.1.2012, preferred by the petitioner on behalf of the Society and consequently to take necessary action against the respondents those, who have illegally occupied the office of the Rameswaram Vattara Kalanjiam situate at No.12/42, Vannan Street, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District and hand...
M. Murugan Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by Secretary Finance Depar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to dispose the petitioner's appeal petition, dated 10.08.2012, within the time frame as fixed by this Honourable Court and further directing the 1st respondent to secure teh amount of Rs.1,47,280/- (One lakhs forty seven thousand two hundred and eighty only) from the 3rd respondent for making the payment to the petitioner for taking the treatment at the 4th respondent hospital with the other incidental expenses.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner's appeal petition, dated 10.08.2012, within the time frame as fixed by this Court and further directing the 1st respondent to secure the amount of Rs.1,47,280/- (One lakhs fourty seven thousand two hundred and eighty only) from the 3rd respondent for making the payment to the petitioner for taking the tr...
The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd., Vs. S. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: This Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the decree and judgment dated 08.07.2015, made in MCOP.No.2255 of 2013 on the file of the IV Judge of Small Causes Court, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai.) 1. This appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 08.07.2015, made in MCOP.No.2255 of 2013 on the file of the IV Judge of Small Causes Court, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai, in and by which, the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.14,56,000/- as against the claim of Rs.15,00,000/- for the death of one Ravikumar, breadwinner of the claimants' family. 2. On 05.02.2013 at about 14.00 hrs., while the deceased was crossing the road in the pedestrian crossing at the Shanthi Colony, near Gangothri Sweet Stall, Anna Nagar, Chennai, a bus belonging to the appellant Transport Corporation bearing Registration No.TN-01-N-5548 coming from East to West driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner, dashed against the deceased a...
A. Ananthi Vs. The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to approve the appointment of the petitioner dated 01.3.2007 as B.T Assistant in the fifth respondent / Concordia Higher Secondary School, Valliyoor with in a time stipulated by this Court.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to approve her appointment, dated 01.3.2007 as B.T Assistant in the fifth respondent / Concordia Higher Secondary School, Valliyoor with in a time stipulated by this Court. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided in the case of S.Christy vs. The Chief Educational Officer reported in 2011(5) CTC 532. 3. In view of the above, the 3 rd respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petition...
S. Visalakshi Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Sec ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order passed by the Hon'ble Court in W.P.(MD) No.12849 of 2013 dated 01.08.2013 and allow the above writ petition.) S.S. Sundar, J. 1. The unsuccessful petitioner in the writ petition in W.P.(MD)No.12849 of 2013 is the appellant in the above writ appeal. 2. The case of the writ petitioner / appellant is that she is a grand-daughter of Late Subramania Pillai, who was a freedom fighter. Though the Government of Tamil Nadu has enumerated various schemes to give benefit to the freedom fighters and their legal heirs, by providing reservations for the descendants of the freedom fighters for certain Government posts, such a reservation was not provided when the second respondent issued a notification for the recruitment of Assistant Professors in Tamil Nadu Collegiate Educational Service for appointment in Government Arts and Science Colleges. The notification is for filling up of 1093 vacancies in various subjec...
T. Ayyappan Vs. The Director Directorate of Employment and Training an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to include the name of the petitioner with the registration No. 1991 MO2388 in the live register maintained at the office of the 3rd respondents and to forward the petitioner's name when called for by the Teachers Recruitment Board, the 4th respondent herein under Rule 10(a)(i) of the General Rule of State and Subordinate Serives to appoint Post Graduate Teachersin regular time scale of pay.) 1. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to include the name of the petitioner with the registration No. 1991 MO2388 in the live register maintained at the office of the 3rd respondents and to forward the petitioner's name when called for by the Teachers Recruitment Board, the 4th respondent herein under Rule 10(a)(i) of the General Rule of State and Subordinate Serives to appoint Post Graduate Teachers in regular time scale of pay. 2. The l...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »