Chennai Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Poolankudi Poovhilugandha Ayyanar and Vinayagar Temple, Poolankudi Vil ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 21.02.2002 made in A.S.No.38 of 2000 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Sivaganga reversing the judgment and decree dated 12.11.1999 made in O.S.No.65 of 1999 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Sigaganga. Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 21.02.2002 made in A.S.No.18 of 2000 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Sivaganga reversing the well considered judgment and decree dated 12.11.1999 made in O.S.No.65 of 1999 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Sigaganga.) 1. The plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.65 of 1999 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Sivagangai is the appellant in the above second appeals. 2. The plaintiff / appellant filed a suit for declaration that the suit property belongs to the temple and for consequential permanent injunction restraining the defendants fro...
D. Sathish Petitioner and Others Vs. The Central Board of Secondary Ed ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 15.09.2016 and to declare the petitioner as qualified in National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test - II (NEET-II) 2016 based on the marks secured by the petitioner in the category Other Backward Class (OBC) based on the Community Certificate submitted by the Petitioner.) Common Order 1. Petitioner in W.P.No.35437 of 2016 seeks to amend the prayer to so as to quash the order dated 19.8.2016 rejecting his request to challenge the status from 'Unreserved' to 'OBC' on the ground that it is only a mistake. After hearing both sides, the request of the petitioner is accepted and the petitioner is permitted to amend the prayer so as to set aside the order dated 19.8.2016 rejecting his request to challenge the status from UR to OBC. Office is directed to incorporate the change in the prayer 2. Al...
Karuppusamy Vs. Devaraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 04.09.2010 passed in I.A.No.294 of 2010 in O.S.No.1817 of 2007 on the file of the learned II Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore.) Order: 1. This civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 04.09.2010 passed in I.A.No.294 of 2010 in O.S.No.1817 of 2007 on the file of the learned II Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore. 2. The revision petitioner is the defendant in the suit. The respondent herein, who is the plaintiff, filed a suit in O.S.No.1817 of 2006 before the learned II Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the peaceful enjoyment and usage of East West lane on the Northern side of the suit property by the plaintiff. Written statement was also filed by the defendant. Thereafter, the suit was posted for trial. After completing the plaintiff's side evidence, the suit was post...
M. Gnanaraj Pastorate Committee Member, St. George's Church, Madurai V ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to direct the Principal District Munsif Court, Madurai Town to expedite the proceedings in I.A.No.522 of 2016 in O.S.No.367 of 2016 on its file, within the time frame fixed by this Court.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking a direction to the Principal District Munsif Court, Madurai Town to expedite the proceedings in I.A.No.522 of 2016 in O.S.No.367 of 2016, on its file, within the time frame fixed by this Court. 2. According to the Petitioner, the Petitioner as plaintiff, has filed a suit in O.S.No.367 of 2016 before the Principal District Munsif, Madurai Town, for declaration and for consequential permanent injunction. In the aforesaid suit, the Petitioner has filed an application in I.A.No.522 of 2016 for restraining the third respondent from functioning as chief Priest of St.George's Church, Madurai, pending the suit. Counter affidavit has also been filed by the ...
A.G. Gopal Vs. The Chief Secretary cum Vigilance Commissioner, Chennai ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents to initiate appropriate criminal action against Murugiah, I.A.S., Sudha Malya, Deputy Inspector General of Registrations, Chennai Zone, Beach Road, Chennai - 1, V.N.Ranganathan, former Sub-Registrar, (presently dismissed from his service for professional delinquency) and presently residing at No.52/72, II Cross Street, Devi nagar, Arcot employed as District Registrar, Kodambakkam, Chennai 24, residing at No.4, Akalya Apartments, No.2/55, Mambalam High Road, T.Nagar, Chennai -17, G.Sankar, No.80, Perumal Koil Street, Edaiman Nagar, Madhavaram, Palpannai, Chennai - 51, by registering the Petitioner's complaint dated 25.05.20-16, investigate into the same.) 1. The Petitioner has preferred the instant Criminal Original Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in directing the Respondent to initiate criminal action against 1) Murugiah, I.A.S.; 2) Sudha Malya, Deputy Inspector General of Registr...
S. Arunkumar and Others Vs. G. Menaga
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the administrative order dated 21.11.2012 passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore directing the office to number the petition filed by the respondent/petitioner under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 as O.P.No.145 of 2012 and consequently, dismiss the same.) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this civil revision petition. He also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle. In view of the same, the civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed....
S. Haji Mohammed Vs. K. Selvaraj and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
(Common Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to expedite the proceedings in R.C.O.P.Nos.3 and 4 of 2014, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Kumbakonam.) Common Order 1. These Civil Revision Petitions are filed seeking a direction to the Principal District Munsif, Kumbakonam, to dispose of R.C.O.P.Nos.3 and 4 of 2014, within the time frame fixed by this Court. 2. According to the Petitioner, the respondent in C.R.P.No.2042 of 2016 is a tenant of shop Nos.202 and 203 for 15 years, for a monthly rent of Rs.700/- and failed to pay the rent for the past five years. Hence the Petitioner has filed R.C.O.P.No.3 of 2014 under Section 10(2)(1) and 14(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act) 28 /1960. 3. The respondent in C.R.P.No.2043 of 2016 is a tenant of shop Nos. 102, 116, 117, 118 and 119 for 15 years, for a monthly rent of Rs.3,050/- and failed to pay the monthly rent from April 2012 onwar...
M. Jayarama Reddy Vs. R. Ramaswamy Reddy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. to set aside the judgment dated 01.12.2015 passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri made in CA.No.22 of 2015 confirming the order dated 19.03.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Hosur made in STC.No.137 of 2014.) 1. This Criminal Revision is directed against the Judgment passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri made in C.A.No.22 of 2015 dated 01.12.2015 confirming the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Hosur made in STC.No.137 of 2014 dated 19.03.2015, convicting the accused to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and directing him to pay a compensation of Rs.34,00,000/- to the complainant. 2. The brief facts of the case which are leading to the present revision are as follows :- The revision petitioner borrowed a sum of Rs.34,00,000/- for his business purposes in different dates, to discharge the above ...
P. Ramkumar Vs. T. Rukumaniammal and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to strike off the suit in O.S.No.752 of 2013 on the file of the learned I Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore.) 1. This civil revision petition is filed to strike off the suit in O.S.No.752 of 2013 on the file of the learned I Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. N.Anand Venkatesh, learned counsel for the revision petitioner has fairly submitted that the suit is already posted for trial. Hence, at this stage, he has not insisted this Court for main relief sought for in the civil revision petition and requested to give direction for speedy disposal of the suit, which is pending before the trial Court. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent has also accepted the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the fair submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is inclined to direct the learned tr...
Kannan @ Ramanathan Vs. State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Vadakadu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 27.04.2015 made in S.C.No.76 of 2011, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the first accused in S.C.No.76 of 2011, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. There were three other accused, by name, Mr.Chinnakannu, Mrs.Suriyakala and Mr.Baskaran, who were arrayed as Accused Nos.2 to 4 in the case. The Trial Court framed two charges against all the four accused, as detailed below. ChargeAccusedPenal Provisions11 to 4498(A)IPC21 to 4304(B) IPC By Judgment dated 27.04.2015, the Trial Court acquitted the accused Nos.2 to 4 from both the charges, however, convicted the appellant/the first accused alone, as detailed below:- Section of LawSentenceFine amount498(A) IPCTo undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years.Rs.5,000/- in default...