Chennai Court September 2015 Judgments
D.Chelladurai Vs. State Rep By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-03-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI CRL.A(MD).No.181 of 2011 D.Chelladurai : Appellant Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District. [Crime No.485 of 2005].. : Respondent PRAYER: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction, dated 26.04.2007, made in S.C.No.120 of 2006, on the file of the learned Additional District Sessions Judge [Fast Track Court No.I]., Tuticorin Division, Tuticorin. !For Appellant : Mr.S.Durairaj ^For Respondent : Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT [JUDGMENT of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J]. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.120 of 2006, on the file of the learned Additional District Sessions Judge [Fast Track Court No.I]., Tuticorin Division, Tuticorin. He stood charged for the offences punishable und...
Tag this Judgment!1.Executive Director, Vs. 1.The Additional Director,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-03-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.P.(MD)No.14281 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 1.Executive Director, F.Seyad Rabbani, Seyad Cotton Mills Ltd., NH7 Tiruvananthapuram Main Road, Moondradaippu, Tirunelveli District. 2.R.Gnanaprakash ..Petitioners versus 1.The Additional Director, Department of Revenue Intelligence, Chennai. 2.The Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, 22/14, Celin Garden, Roche Colony, South Beach Road, Tuticorin..Respondents PRAYER Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the impugned summon issued by the 2nd respondent in file No.DRI/CZU/TTN/48/05/INT-1/2015, dated 03.08.2015 and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and arbitrary. !For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kathirvelu, Senior Counsel for Mr.KA.Raamakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.R.Aravindan :ORDER This Writ petition has been filed for issuance of ...
Tag this Judgment!M.Panchavarnam Vs. M.Jeyanthi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-03-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY S.A.(MD)No.437 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 M.Panchavarnam .Appellant/Appellant/Defendant versus M.Jeyanthi ..Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul in A.S.No.67 of 2014, dated 17.02.2015 dismissing the appeal preferred against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Munsif, Dindigul in O.s.No.298 of 2011 dated 17.07.2014. !For Appellant : Mr.A.Hariharan ^For Respondent : Mr.J.Sureshkumar :JUDGMENT The above Second Appeal arises against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.67 of 2014, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.298 of 2011, on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Dindigul. The defendant is the appell...
Tag this Judgment!1.M/S.Time Pharmaceuticals, Vs. State Represented By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-03-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Original Petition(MD) No.21860 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 1.M/s.Time Pharmaceuticals, R.No.151/1, Sri Nathan Nagar, Villianour, Pondicherry-605 110, Represented by its Partner, Tmt.M.Sathammai. 2.M.Sathammai 3.S.Laiqa Parveen 4.S.Karunambigai 5.N.Saravanan 6.M/s.Kronie Health Care (P) Ltd., Represented by V.Meenakshi Sundaram 7.V.Meenakshi Sundaram : Petitioners Vs. State represented by The Drug Inspector, Theni Range, Madurai Zone, O/o.the Assistant Director of Drugs Control, No.5, Ramaiah Street, Shenoy Nagar, Madurai-625 020. : Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records of the case in S.T.C.No.4944 of 2010, on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam, and quash the said case in S.T.C.No.4944 of 2010, by setting aside the order dated 09.04.2014 passed in Crl.M.P.No.5575 of 2...
Tag this Judgment!Ganeshan Vs. State Rep. By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-03-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI Crl.A(MD)No.283 of 2013 Ganeshan .. Appellant/ Single Accused Vs. State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Vachakarapatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District. (Crime No.124 of 2012) .. Respondent/Complainant PRAYER Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. praying this Court, to call for the records in S.C.No.187 of 2012 dated 25.07.2013 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Virudhunagar and to set aside the same and acquit the appellant / accused herein and thus render justice. For Appellant : Mr.N.Mohideen Basha For Respondent : Mr.C.Ramesh, Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.P.Santhosh Kumar, Advocate :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by V.S.RAVI,J.) The appellant is the sole accused in Crime No.124 of 2012, in S.C.No.187 of 2012 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Virudhunagar. ...
Tag this Judgment!Nagaraj Vs. State Rep.By Its
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Criminal Appeal (MD)No.305 of 2014 Nagaraj ..Appellant -versus State rep.by its The Inspector of Police, NIB-CID, Theni Police Station, Theni. Crime Nos.74 to 80 of 2004..Respondent Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code, against the judgment dated 12.11.2013 in C.C.No.590 of 2004 on the file of the Additional District Judge for Principal Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai. !For appellant : Mr.S.Gokul Raj ^For respondent : Mr.P.Kandasamy, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side) :JUDGMENT Reserved on : 27.08.2015 Delivered on : 02.09.2015 The appellant herein is the fifth accused in the case registered by the respondent against him under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (?.NDPS Act?. in short).stating that the appellant along with seven others were found to be each in possession of ganja weighing 21 gm., and tha...
Tag this Judgment!Koodammal Vs. The Junior Engineer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI W.P.(MD)No.15409 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 Koodammal : Petitioner Vs. The Junior Engineer, PWD - WRO, Varadhamanadhi Dam Division, Palani 624 601, Dindigul District. : Respondent PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to call for the records relating to the impugned notice dated 17.08.2015 issued by the respondent in respect of Survey Nos.1203/1 and 2, Kamarajar Nagar, Palani, Dindigul District and quash the same. !For Appellant : Mr.G.R.Swaminathan For Mr.T.Antony Arul Raj For Respondent : Mr.K.Chellapandian Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.Muthukaruppan Additional Government Pleader [Reserved On :27. 08.2015 Pronounced On :02. 09.2015]. :ORDER This Writ Petition is all about the obstruction for the removal of the encroachment on water bodies comprised in Survey Nos.1203/1 and 2, Kamarajar ...
Tag this Judgment!K.Vasu Vs. 1.The Commissioner,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.14748 of 2014 K.Vasu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Dindigul City Municipal Corporation, Dindigul. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to remove the encroachment made in the common pathway at Survey No.442/6c1 and other surrounding areas in Chettinaickanpatti, Dindigul Taluk, Dindigul District. !For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.M.Alagathevan, Special Govt. Pleader :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SUDHAKAR,J.) The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition in public interest, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to remove the encroachment made in the common pathway at Survey No.442/6c1...
Tag this Judgment!R.Aniteen Princey Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :02. 09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15208 of 2012 Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos.15208 of 2012, 3494, 15979 & 16748 of 2013, 11731, 18111, 20649 & 21387 of 2014 and W.P.(MD) Nos.6774 of 2011, 2913 & 3734 of 2012 R.Aniteen Princey D/o.J.Roby ... Petitioner/Accused 1 -Vs- 1.The Inspector of Police, Vadaseri Police Station, Kanyakumari District. Crime No.1076 of 2012 ... Respondent/Complainant 2.Anittar Alwin S/o.J.Roby ... Respondent/De-facto complainant Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to call for the records and to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.1076 of 2012 on the file of the first respondent dated 25.06.2012 for the alleged offence u/s.147, 148, 120(b) and 506(ii) IPC. Crl.O.P.(MD) No.3494 of 2013 1.J.Roby S/o.John Rose 2.R.Kethisi Bai W/o.J.Roby 3.R.Aniteen Princey D/o.J.Roby ... Petitioners/Accused 1 to 3 -Vs- 1.The Inspector of Polic...
Tag this Judgment!M.Ramaswami Vs. 1.P.Srinivasan(Deceased)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY S.A.No.625 of 1999 and S.A.No.626 of 1999 S.A.No.625 of 1999 M.Ramaswami .Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff versus 1.P.Srinivasan(deceased) 2.S.Ramuthai 3.Mayilvahanan.S4S.Subramani 5.S.Krishnaveni 6.S.Narasimman ..Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff (Respondents No.2 to 6 are brought on record as L.Rs.Of the deceased sole respondent vide order dated 13.12.2001 made in C.M.P.Nos.20744 and 20745 of 2001) Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 15.10.1997 in A.S.No.136 of 1996 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Palani in confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.02.1996 in O.S.No.157 of 1990 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Palani. S.A.No.625 of 1999 M.Ramaswami .Appellant/Appellant/Defendant versus 1.P.Srinivasan(deceased) 2.S.Ramuthai 3.Mayilvahanan.S4S.Subramani 5.S.Krishnaveni 6.S.Narasimman ..Respo...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »