Chennai Court September 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
O.Ukirapandian Vs. 1.The Commissioner,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.12982 of 2014 O.Ukirapandian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner (HR & CE), Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Chennai - 34. 2.The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Office of the Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, (Annexed and Unannexed Temples), Melachithirai Vethi, Madurai District. 3.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Madurai District. 4.The Commissioner of Madurai Corporation, Office of the Commissioner of Madurai Corporation, Madurai District. 5.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai District. 6.The Inspector of Police, B-9, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai District, Madurai. 7.Thenindiya Vellalar Uravin Murai Sangam, represented by its Chairman, Sri Iyyanar Sri Ponmuniyandi Kovil Valagam, Sampati...
K.Kanagalingam Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.12880 of 2014 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 K.Kanagalingam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Theni District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District. 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Theni District. 4.Sivasubramanian ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 herein to restore the Odai Poramboke pathway in S.No.401/1 for ingress and egress to the Koduvilarpatti and Sivalinga Naickenpatti, Theni Taluk, Theni District, for the use of public, pedestrians and cart, within a reasonable time as may be fixed by this Court. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.Appadurai For Respondents : Mr.M.Alagathevan Special Govt. Pleader for R.1 to R.3 No appearance for R.4 :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SUDHAK...
1.Santhanam @ Santhanakumar Vs. State Represented By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI Crl.A(MD)No.23 of 2011 and Crl.A(MD)No.25 of 2011 1.Santhanam @ Santhanakumar 2.Esakithurai @ Thurai .Appellants in Crl.A(MD)No.23 of 2011 3.Saravanan 4.Murugan 5.Ganesan .Appellants in Crl.A(MD)No.25 of 2011 versus State represented by The Inspector of Police, Central Police Station, Tuticorin District. (Crime No.38 of 2006).Respondent in both Crl.As. PRAYER: Appeals are filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction passed by the learned Additional and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Tuticorin, in S.C.No.98 of 2007, dated 11.01.2011. !For Appellants : Mr.V.Kathirvelu in both Crl.As. Senior Counsel for Mr.K.Prabhu for M/s.Kathirvelu Associates. ^For Respondent : Mr.A.Ramar, in both Crl.As. Additional Public Prosecutor. :COMMON JUDGMENT (Common Judgment of the Court was made by S.NAG...
V.P.Murugan Vs. 1.The President,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.764 of 2009 V.P.Murugan ..Petitioner versus 1.The President, Vikkiramangalam Panchayat, Chellampatty Panchayat Union, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. 2.The Block Development Officer (Panchayat) Chellampatty Panchayat Union, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Usilampatti, Madurai District. 4.The Assistant Director (Panchayat).Madurai 20. 5.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 6.A.Jayamani 7.A.Anbu 8.K.Manoharan ..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 5th respondent herein to remove the encroachments made in survey Nos.213 214/1 and 214/2 of Mampattipatty village, Nariyampatty post Mullipallam via Usilampatti taluk Madurai district by 6th to 8th respondents. !For Petition...
S.Baskar Vs. 1.The District Collector of
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.341 of 2014 S.Baskar ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector of Tiruchirapalli District, Office of District Collectorate, Tiruchirappalli 1. 2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Thiruverumbur, Tiruchirapalli District. 3.The Commissioner, Thiruverumbur Panchayat Union, Thiruverumbur, Tiruchirappalli District. 4.The President, Guntur Panchayat, Guntur, Tiruchirapalli 7. 5.Sr.Ramakrishna Matriculation School Rep by its Correspondent, 1/518, Ayyampatti, Guntur Village, Thiruverumbur Taluk. 6.Durai Murugan ..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 to 4 to remove the encroachments encroached by the Respondents 5 and 6 in S.No.113/38 Arasu Poromboke Pathai in Ayyampatti, Guntur Village, Thiruverumbur Taluk, Tiruchirapalli...
Marimuthu Vs. State Rep. by The
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.S.RAVI Crl.A(MD)No.59 of 2011 Marimuthu .. Appellant/ Sole accused Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Murappanad Police Station, Tuticorin District. (Crime No.294/2008) .. Respondent/ Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. against the conviction and sentence, dated 07.01.2011, made in S.C.No.176 of 2009, by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tuticorin. For appellant : Mr.R.Anand For respondent : Mr.C.Mayilvahana Rajendran, Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.) The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.176 of 2009 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tuticorin. He stood charged for the offence under Section 302 IPC. By judgment dated 07.01.2011, the trial Court convicted him for the offence under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to und...
1.T.Kamalakkannan Vs. State by Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI CRL.A(MD).No.431 of 2010 1.T.Kamalakkannan 2.P.Siva 3.S.Suresh @ Suresh Kumar 4.K.Veeramani : Appellants Vs. State by Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District, [in Crime No.128 of 2005].. : Respondent PRAYER: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 28.10.2010 made in S.C.No.132 of 2010, on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge [FTC]. Dindigul. !For Appellants : Mr.P.Andiraj ^For Respondent : Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT [JUDGMENT of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J]. The appellants are the accused Nos.1 to 4 in S.C.No.132 of 2010, on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge [FTC]. Dindigul. The Trial Court framed as many as three charges against the accused, as detaile...
S.Nambhurajan Vs. The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01. 09.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI CRIMINAL APPEAL (MD).No.448 of 2009 S.Nambhurajan : Appellant Vs. The Inspector of Police Kenikarai Police Station Ramanathapuram District. in Crime No.494 of 2007 :Respondent PRAYER: Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, in S.C.No.42 of 2008 dated 30.01.2009. !For Appellant : Mr.P.Andiraj ^For Respondent : Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.) The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.42 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram. He stood charged for offences under Section 302 IPC. By judgment dated 30.01.2009, the trial Court found him guilty under Section 302 IPC and convicted him and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ...
T. Jeyaram Vs. 1. the District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :01. 09.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR AND THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.13564 of 2014 and M.P(MD).No.1 of 2014 T. Jeyaram .. Petitioner vs.1. The District Collector, Collectorate Campus, Dindigul District.2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District.3. The Tahsildar, Athoor Taluk Office, Dindigul District.4. The Village Administrative Officer, Seevalsaragu Village, Athoor Taluk, Dindigul District.5. The President, Seevalsaragu Panchayat, Seevalsaragu Post, Athoor Taluk, Dindigul District.6. C. Selvan 7. C. Vedi @ Jeyaram 8. V. Vaiyapuri ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents 1 to 5 herein to remove the illegal encroachments made by the respondents 6 to 8 herein in the public road particularly in the stretch of Survey Nos.652/21 and 652/13 situated in Seevalsaragu Village, Athoor Taluk, Din...
Rethinasamy Nadar Vs. 1. the District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :01. 09.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR AND THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.13352 of 2014 and M.P(MD).No.1 of 2014 Rethinasamy Nadar .. Petitioner vs.1. The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruchendur, Tuticorin District.3. The Tahsildar, Sathankulam Taluk, Sathankulam, Tuticorin District.4. T. Maharajan ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachments of the fourth respondent made in the government poromboke land in Survey No.167/32 to an extent of 3.75 cents, situates in North Udaipirappu, Pallakurichi Village, Sathankulam Taluk, Tuticorin District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 17.12.2012, within the time limit. !For Petitioner ... Mr. M.S. Jeyakarthick ^For R1 to R3 ... Mr.M.Alagatheven Sp...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »