Chennai Court November 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s. Elite Furniture Mart Coimbatore Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (C ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-26-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st Respondent to refund an amount of Rs.1,33,440/- forcibly collected vide Cheque No.006616, dated 28.09.2015 drawn on HDFC Bank, RS Puram Branch, Coimbatore from the Petitioner at the time of inspection on 23.09.2015 by the officials of the 2nd Respondent, as per the representation made by the Petitioner dated 25.10.2015.)By consent of the learned counsel on either side, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner seeks for a direction to the 1st Respondent to refund an amount of Rs.1,33,440/- forcibly collected vide Cheque No.006616, dated 28.09.2015 drawn on HDFC Bank, RS Puram Branch, Coimbatore from the Petitioner at the time of inspection on 23.09.2015 by the officials of the 2nd Respondent, as per the representation made by the Petitioner dated 25.10.2015. 3. The Petitioner is engaged in the business of wood and steel furniture and an assessee on the fi...
S. Manthiram Vs. The General Manager, Reserve bank of India, Chennai a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-26-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to take action against the second respondentto return back the eight bangles and one bracelet and on the same day receive the sum of Rs.1,25,000/-.) 1. This writ petition is filed seeking for a Mandamus directing the first respondent to take action against the second respondent and to return back the eight bangles and one bracelet belonging to the petitioner. 2. According to the petitioner, he pledged eight bungles and one bracelet with the second respondent bank and therefore, the same have to be returned to him, after receiving the necessary amount from him. Since the same are not returned, he has come forward with this writ petition with the prayer as stated supra. 3. On the other hand, it is contended by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent that the petitioner has not pledged eight bungles and he pledged only six bungles ...
T. Bala Sudhakar Vs. The Chairman Tamil Nadu Forest Uniformed Services ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-26-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the experience of the petitioner as Technical Assistant for three years in the department and give preference to the petitioner while recruiting personnel for the posts call for in Respondents advertisement No.1 of 2014 dated 22.12.2014.) 1. The petitioner is working as Technical Assistant in the Forestry Extension Officer, Forestry Extention Division, Theni @ Vaigai Dam. He is working on temporary basis. 2. The Tamil Nadu Forest Uniformed Services Recruitment Board conducted competitive examination for direct recruitment of Forester/Field Assistant on 22.02.2015. The petitioner also participated therein. He obtained 84.8 marks. He belongs to backward community category. He has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the respondent to give preference to the petitioner for the above said posts in view of his experience as Technica...
S. Thirumamani Vs. The Additional Principal Secretary/Revenue Commissi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-26-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to dispose the appeal preferred by the petitioner dated 04.02.2015 against the order passed by the 2nd respondent vide his proceedings in A6/13284/13 dated 07.01.2015 within the time that may be stipulated by this Court.) 1. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant in the year 1983. While he was working as Tahsildar in the year 2013, a charge memo was issued by the 2nd respondent vide his proceedings in T2/13284/2013 dated 21.05.2013 and after enquiry, he was dismissed from service vide proceedings dated 07.01.2015 in A6/13284/13 by the second respondent. challenging the aforesaid order of dismissal, the petitioner filed an appeal before the first respondent on 04.02.2015. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though the appeal was filed on 04.02.2015, the appeal is not yet disposed of. Therefore, he approached this Court seeking ...
Rasu Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy and Oth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-26-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent dated 16.11.2015, quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to grant permission and police protection for "Gramiya Adal Padal Vizha" scheduled to be held on 23.11.2015 at 7.30pm., at Sri Shenbaga Vinayagar Temple premises located at Akkiyampatti Village, Palayapalayam Post, Marungapuri Taluk, Trichy District.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking to quash the impugned order of the 3rd respondent dated 16.11.2015, declining to grant permission to conduct "Gramiya Adal Padal Vizha". The petitioner also sought a direction to the respondents to grant permission and police protection for "Gramiya Adal Padal Vizha" scheduled to be held on 23.11.2015 at 7.30pm., at Sri Shenbaga Vinayagar Temple premises located at Akkiyampatti Village, Palayapalayam Post, Marun...
S. Vanitha Vs. The State rep. by its Principal Home Secretary, Chennai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-26-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider petitioner's application dated 05.10.2000 in the light of G.O.Ms.No.165, dated 30.08.2010 and provide employment on compassionate ground, within stipulated period.) 1. The father of the petitioner was employed as Police Constable. While he was in service, he died on 07.01.1998. He left behind him the petitioner, her mother and three sisters. The petitioner claims compassionate appointment. An application was made on 05.10.2000 for compassionate appointment. The third respondent sent a proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A8/1006/2000 dated 17.01.2001 to the second respondent enclosing the application of the petitioner for compassionate appointment. The same is the proposal for providing compassionate appointment. Thereafter, the third respondent sent a proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A8/1006/01 dated 05.03.2004, directing the petitioner to produce certain ...
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupu ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-26-2015
(Prayer: Memorandum of Grounds of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 28.8.2012 made in M.C.O.P.No.10 of 2009 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu.) 1. This civil miscellaneous appeal has been directed against the impugned award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu in M.C.O.P.No.10 of 2009 dated 28.8.2012 awarding a sum of Rs.7,03,000/- as the total compensation for the death of one Mr.Appu alias Mr.P.Santhakumar in a road accident at the age of 20 years on 21.8.2007. Aggrieved by the award, the Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Limited has brought this appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the Tribunal has improperly applied the multiplier of 18 and proceeded wrongly to award the higher compensation of Rs.7,03,000/- by taking into account t...
The Management of Mettur Thermal Power Station Tamil Nadu Electricity ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-26-2015
(Prayer: The appeal is filed under Clause-15 of Letters Patent Appeal against the orders dismissing the Writ Petition in WP.No.18646/2006 dated 23.04.2010.) Dr. P. Devadass, J. As only a short point is involved, we shall dispose of this appeal today, at the admission stage itself. 2. This writ appeal arises out of the order of the Writ court passed in WP.No.18646/2006 dated 23.04.2010, whereunder, the Award of the Labour Court, Salem, passed in ID.No.482 of 2000 dated 20.09.2004, has been upheld. 3. As early as on 04.06.93, a Settlement between the 1st respondent/Labour Union representing the contract workers and the appellant/Management to provide appointment on compassionate ground to the dependants of the deceased contract workers who died in harness, has been arrived at. There are 17 such cases of death of contract labourers. In pursuance of the settlement, their dependants have sought for appointment on compassionate ground. It was denied by the Management. 4. Dispute was raised b...
G. Ravanan Vs. The Director General of Police, Chennai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to include the name of the petitioner in the panel of Inspectors of Police fit for promotion to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police for the year 2013-14 and consequently to direct the 1st respondent to promote the petitioner as Deputy Superintendent of Police from the date on which juniors were promoted by taking into account of ''Further Action Dropped in P.R.No.20/14 issued U/r. 3(b) of Tamil Nadu Police Sub-Ordinate Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1955 by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Railways, Chennai, in his proceedings in Tha.Ko.20/14 rule 3 (b) dated 25.09.2015 and by considering his representation dated 09.11.2015 within the period that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The petitioner is serving as Inspector of Police at Sivagangai District. According to him, he is to be included in the panel of ...
Kattari @ Neelamegam and Another Vs. State by Inspector of Police, Ari ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the judgment passed in S.C.No.54 of 2005 dated 30.11.2015 by the Additional Sessions Court (Fast Track Court), Ariyalur.) 1. The convictions and sentences dated 30.11.2015 passed in Sessions Case No.54 of 2005 by the Additional District and Sessions Court (Fast Track Court), Ariyalur, are being challenged in the present Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the prosecutrix, by name Lalitha is the daughter of the defacto complainant, by name Senthamarai; that on 09.09.2004, at about 1.00 p.m., both of them have worked in their field. At that time, the 1st accused has approached the prosecutrix for getting water and after some time, the first accused has asked the prosecutrix to come to house along with him. The prosecutrix has conceded the request made by the 1st accused and proceeded towards house along with him and on the way, the 1st accused has taken the prosecutrix to the tha...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »