Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Rajendra Prasad Vs. The Regional Transport Authority, Nagercoil, Ka ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to permit the petitioner's Mini Bus bearing Registration No. TN 27 N 0073 as per the Transport Commissioner's circular letter in R.No.90919/E2/2000 dated 29.11.2000 while ply on the route Thalakudi Bus Stop to Vadasery Bus Stop.) 1. The petitioner, who is holding mini bus permit issued by the respondent/Regional Transport Authority, Nagercoil, for the route from Thalakudi Bus Stop to Vadasery Bus Stop in respect of the vehicle bearing registration No. TN 27 N 0073, has come to this Court seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to permit the aforesaid mini bus, as per the Transport Commissioner's circular letter in R.No.90919/E2/2000 dated 29.11.2000. 2. This type of prayer cannot be entertained by this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, since the Regional Transport Authority/ District Collector is the competent...
R. Subash Chandrabose Vs. The District Collector, Dindigul District, D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Writ petition (MD) No.10873 of 2015 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to conduct detailed enquiry against the erred employees and respondents Nos.6 to 9 for changing the entry in the Settlement Land Register of the year 1914 by an act of forgery in respect of land in Survey No.507 bearing Patta No.1148 to an extent of 3 acres and 82 cents situated at seelapadi Village, Dindigul District and peruse the title deeds of the parties and other revenue records in respect of the petition land from the year 1914 to as on date and find out the truth and thereupon to initiate an appropriate action against the persons, who are involved in this forgery and ultimately to issue patta in the petitioners' favour in respect of Vinayaga Nagar - A Block, house site Plot Nos.3 and 4 to an extent of 4800 sq.ft. in Survey No.507 in Seelapadi Village, Dindigul District who is entitled to get patta by cancelling...
Senthivadivu Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Gov ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned charge memo dated 19.10.2015 in Thandanaipatti No.125/2015 issued by the 2nd respondent under Section 17(b) of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules and quash the same.) 1. The petitioner/Senthivadivu has come to this Court challenging the correctness of the impugned charge memo dated 19.10.2015 on the ground that the charge memo has been issued arbitrarily without conducting proper enquiry and only on the allegation of her husband regarding the personal character of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that only out of personal vengeance, the petitioner's own husband has given a complaint and on the basis of the said complaint, the charge memo has been issued to the petitioner. 3. After some arguments, Mr.R.Narayanan, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permis...
S. Iyyammal Vs. The Director, Director of Adidravidar Welfare, Chepauk ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to impugned order dated 14.10.2015 vide Na.Ka.No.03/25992/15 passed by the 1st Respondent and quash thesame as Arbitrary illegal in violation of the settled principles of law and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to work as warden in the very same station till the disposal of the writ petition.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by S.Iyyammal to challenge the impugned order of transfer dated 14.10.2015, wherein, she has been transferred to Government (ADW) High School, Sundarajapuram, Virudhunagar District, on the ground that the transfer order has been passed during the middle of the academic year and that apart, without prior notice to her, the present impugned order has been passed. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that as the impugned transfer order has been issued with...
R. Mariyammal Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents to register a case/F.I.R on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 05.10.2015 and investigate the same in accordance with law.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to direct the respondents to register a case/F.I.R on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 05.10.2015 and investigate the same in accordance with law. 2. The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 05.10.2015, a case in Crime No.767 of 2015 was registered by the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b) and 506(i) of Indian Penal Code. 3. In view of the above stated position, the second respondent is directed to investigate the case in Crime No.767 of 2015 and file a final report in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 4. This Criminal Orig...
Thulasiyammal @ Perinayaki and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent No.2 to register the case based on the complaint given by the complainant on 13.05.2015.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to direct the respondent No.2 to register the case based on the complaint given by the complainant on 13.05.2015. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to the second respondent as early as on 13.10.2015, but, however, the second respondent police had not taken any steps to register a case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner in Current Paper No.C.No.97/ALGSC/II/PDK/15, petition enquiry is pending. 4. Considering the rival submission made on both sides, the second...
S. Palanikumar and Others Vs. The Inspector of Police, Alanganallur Po ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR Act), Madurai to consider the bail application to be filed by the petitioners on the same day of their surrender in Cr.No.409 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323 r/w Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act, in Crime No.409 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, move this petition seeking a direction to the learned Third Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR Court), Madurai, to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider their bail application on the same day on merits, in relating to Crime No.409 of 2015. 3. Perused the records. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5. The offences complained of, other than the offence under the Sp...
T.K. Shanmugam Secretary, C.P.I. (M) North Chennai District Committee, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third and fourth respondents to grant patta and regularize the encroachments in Survey Numbers 1, 2 and 4 (Parts) in No.60, Menambedu Village and in Survey No.813 in No.61, Korattur Village, Ambattur Taluk in terms of G.O.Ms.No.854, dated 30.12.2006, read with G.O.Ms.No.579, dated 03.10.2008, issued by the first respondent herein and in terms of the judgment dated 29.04.2008 in W.P.Nos.16636 of 1995 and 22274 of 2007 reported in 2008 (5) MLJ 1425 and to issue such further or other orders.)Sanjay Kishan Kaul, C.J., M. Sathyanarayanan and T.S. Sivagnanam, J. 1. The petitioner, Secretary of a political party, has filed this Writ Petition designed as a Public Interest Litigation praying for a direction upon the Collector, Chennai District and the Collector, Thiruvallur District, respondents 3 and 4 herein to grant patta and regularize the encroachment in Survey Nos.1, 2 a...
The Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Bangalore Vs. Konappan a ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the M.V.Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.500 of 2013, dated 31.10.2014, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special District Judge, Krishnagiri.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the quantum of compensation of Rs.17,10,000/- with interest, at the rate of 7.5% per annum, awarded to the legal representatives of the deceased, from the date of claim, till deposit, the appellant-Insurance Company, has filed the present appeal, contending inter-alia that the Claims Tribunal has erred in fixing the monthly income of the deceased as Rs.15,000/-, by referring to the salary structure payable to a Teacher in Government Schools and ignoring the fact that the deceased was not employed as a Teacher in any school. That apart, compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- awarded for loss of love and affection and Rs.50,000/- for loss of consortium, is assailed on the ground that it is excessive. As the ...
The Dalit Christian Educational and Development Trust, Kanyakumari rep ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of CertiorarifiedMandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the 4th respondent in No.MSU/CoE/November 2015 dated 07.10.2015 and quash the same and further directing the 3rd respondent University to grant affiliation to the petitioner Arts and Science College viz. Dr. Noble Christian College of Arts and Science for the courses B.Sc. Mathematics, B.A. English and B.Com.) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »