Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
P. Radhakrishnan Vs. L.R. Ramesh
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Fast Track Court Magisterial Level, Madurai in Cr.M.P.No.383 of 2013 in STC No.1068 of 2012 and set aside the order dated 13.02.2013.) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also given a letter to that effect. 2. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
Tag this Judgment!Pandi Vs. The Inspector of Police, Andipatti Police Station, Theni
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint given by one Muthiah, petition enquiry is pending in C.S.R.No.728 of 2015. He further submits that the respondent has not harassed the petitioner. 3. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent. 4.Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the respondent is directed not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry, but le...
Tag this Judgment!S. Thirumani and Another Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, The Director of ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Appeals filed under under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 10.07.2015, made in W.P.(MD)Nos.4742 and 4740 of 2015.) Common Judgment V.M. Velumani, J., 1. These writ appeals have been filed challenging the order dated 10.07.2015, made in W.P.(MD)Nos.4742 and 4740 of 2015. 2. Since common issues are involved in both the writ appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment. 3. The case of the appellants: (i) The appellants and two other students, viz., N.Sivaguru and M.Palanisamy, were studying III year in five years B.A., B.L., Degree course at Government Law College, Trichy. They were extending their support to the students, whenever they went on protest for the interest of students as well as for the interest of the Society and participated in those protest. (ii) Girl students in the ladies hostel were checked-up and searched to find out whether any student is having mobile phone in the hostel. Mrs.Krishna Leela, Assistant Profess...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Dharapuram Vs. N. Sivasubramanian ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the decree and Judgment, dated 03.09.2014, made in M.C.O.P.No.269 of 2006, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Additional District Court No.3), Dharapuram.) 1. The appellant / Insurance Company has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree, dated 03.09.2014, made in M.C.O.P.No.269 of 2006, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Additional District Court No.III, Dharapuram. 2.The short facts of the case are as follows:- On 02.07.2003, at about 03.00 p.m., when the claimant was driving his Maruthi 800 Car bearing registration No.TN47 D7700, on Karu-Dharapuram Main Road, the Ambassador Car bearing registration No.TDE 5161, coming in the opposite direction and driven in a rash and negligent manner, dashed against the Maruthi Car. As a result, the claimant sustained fracture of bone over his left knee and other parts of his body. He subsequen...
Tag this Judgment!The General Manager, BSNL, Salem and Others Vs. A. Arunachalm and Anot ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the order, dated 12.03.2015 made in Original Application No.310/00263 of 2014, on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench and quash the same.) 1. Being aggrieved by the order made in O.A.No.263 of 2014, dated 12.03.2015, by which, the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, has directed the the General Manager, Assistant General Manager and Accounts Officer, BSNL (Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited), Sreerangapalayam, Salem, respondents/writ petitioners, to disburse the monthly pension of the applicant/1st respondent, from 30.04.2011 and pay the entire retirement benefits, leave encashment, salary and arrears of salary to the applicant/1st respondent, within a period of one month, from the date of receipt of passing of the order, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. Facts leading to filing of the writ petition, from the...
Tag this Judgment!Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Another Vs. K.T. Raja Kumaravel ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer in both Writ Appeals: Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 19 February 2015 in W.P.No.21778 of 2012 on the file of this Court.) Prayer in both Writ Appeals: Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the presented under Article 226 of the Constitution of India of the presented under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to hand over the vacant possession of the property in old S.No.695/1 and 695/2 of Boganapalli Village Krishnagiri Taluk now the Town Survey Nos.11/5 and 11/6B of Krishnagiri Town consequently directing the respondents 3 and 4 to cancel the explosive licence to run the Petrol Bunk by the respondents 1 and 2 and not to renew the same in future further directing the 5th respondent to cancel the NOC granted to the respondents 1 and 2 to run the Petrol Bunk in the Premises situated at No.128/253 Madras Road Krishnagiri in Old S.No.695/1 and 695/2 of Boganapalli Vil...
Tag this Judgment!K. Gopalsamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members without due procedure of law.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members without due procedure of law. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, would submit that no petition enquiry is pending and no case registered against the petitioner and no harassment. 3. Recording the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed....
Tag this Judgment!Gopal Vs. The Inspector of Police, Sellur Police Station, Madurai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct therespondent herein not to harass the petitionerunder the guise of enquiry.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to direct therespondent herein not to harass the petitionerunder the guise of enquiry. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, would submit that the petitioner himself gave a complaint, petition enquiry has been conducted and the same has been closed in C.S.R.No.794 of 2015 . 4. Recording the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate(Criminal Side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed....
Tag this Judgment!Manoj Kumar and Others Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Pett ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records in FIR in Crime No.450 of 2015 on the file of the 1st Respondent and quash the same.) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement, made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
Tag this Judgment!G. Alice Packiathangam Vs. The Secretary to Government, School Educati ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the impugned order passed by the 6th respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.346-A1-2014 dated 25.08.2014 quash the same and direct to forward the pension proposal of the petitioner within the time as stipulated by this Court.) 1. The petitioner/G.Alice Packiathangam w/o of Late A.D.Durairaj has come to this Court challenging the impugned order passed by the 6th respondent, dated 25.08.2014 with a further direction to forward her pension proposals to the competent authority within the stipulated time. 2. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that even as per the affidavit filed by the petitioner, the petitioner served in the last school, which is also unaided school, therefore, the claim of the petitioner is unfounded. 3. The above prayer made by the petitioner is far from acceptance for two...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »