Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pandi Vs. The Inspector of Police, Andipatti Police Station, Theni

Pandi vs The Inspector of Police, Andipatti Police Station, Theni

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Oct 30, 2015
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1179163

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL. O.P. (MD) No. 20792 of 2015
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pandi

Respondent

The Inspector of Police, Andipatti Police Station, Theni

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 482 of cr.p.c. praying to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and pass such further or other orders as this court may deem fit.) 1. the petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and pass such further or other orders as this court may deem fit. 2. the learned government advocate (criminal side), on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint given by one muthiah, petition enquiry is pending in c.s.r.no.728 of 2015. he further submits that the respondent has not harassed the petitioner. 3. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned government advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent. 4.considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the respondent is directed not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry, but let the police investigate into the matter in accordance with law and the mandates as found set out in d.k.basu vs. state of west bengal reported in air (1997) sc 610. if really, the police want to interrogate, it is open for the police to issue summons to the petitioners. thereupon, the petitioner shall appear before the police and submit himself for interrogation. 5. the criminal original petition is disposed of with the above direction.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit.)

1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint given by one Muthiah, petition enquiry is pending in C.S.R.No.728 of 2015. He further submits that the respondent has not harassed the petitioner.

3. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent.

4.Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the respondent is directed not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry, but let the police investigate into the matter in accordance with law and the mandates as found set out in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610. If really, the police want to interrogate, it is open for the police to issue summons to the petitioners. Thereupon, the petitioner shall appear before the police and submit himself for interrogation.

5. The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial