Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A. Daisy Rani and Others Vs. State rep. by The Superintendent of Polic ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents herein to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 4.9.2015, investigate the same in accordance with law and file final report within a reasonable time.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the respondents herein to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 4.9.2015, investigate the same in accordance with law and file final report within a reasonable time. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to the second respondent as early as on 04.09.2015, but, however, the second respondent police has not taken any steps to register a case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petition...
Arasu Pokkuvarathu Madurai, Thozhilalar Sangam, Rep. by its General Se ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to initiate criminal action against the respondents 4 and 5 for non implementing and for violation of and breach of the 12(3) settlement regarding determination and payment of daily rate of wages to the drivers and conductors and the respondents 4 and 5 to pay daily rated wages to the daily rated drivers and conductors and reserved drivers and conductors with effect from 1.9.2010 as per the terms of settlement and also to pay daily rated wages to the drivers and conductors in future in terms of the settlement, award costs.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to initiate criminal action against respondents 4 and 5, for their failure to implement the settlement, dated 3...
J. Muruganandhi Vs. State through The Inspector of Police, Karambakkud ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 18.03.2013 made in S.C.No.71 of 2012, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Pudukkottai.) S. Nagamuthu, J. The respondent Nos.2 and 3 are the accused Nos.1 and 2 in S.C.No.71 of 2012, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Pudukkottai. The Trial Court framed as many as two charges as detailed below. ChargeAccusedPenal Provisions11 and 2302 IPC21323 IPC [two counts]By Judgment dated 18.03.2013, the Trial Court acquitted the accused Nos.1 and 2 from all the charges. As against the acquittal, the appellant has come up with this Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:- The deceased, in this case, was one Mr.Jeyaraj. He was residing at Kakkaikon Street at Karambaikudi. The accused are the bangalies of the deceased. There is a poramboke land by the side of the house of the deceased. The deceased was claim...
Eronimose Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District and O ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to transfer the investigation in Crime No.595/2013 on the file of the 2nd respondent police, Karingal Police Station to any other competent independent investigating agency more particularly to CBCID for fair investigation and to file a final report.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to transfer the investigation in Crime No.595/2013 on the file of the second respondent police, Karingal Police Station to any other competent independent investigating agency more particularly to CBCID for fair investigation and to file a final report. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submits that already the charge sheet has been filed and the same was taken on file in P.R.C.No.62 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. 3. Recording the submissions of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) , this Criminal Original Petition is ...
Oikattan Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli Distri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 372 of Cr.P.C. against the conviction and sentence, dated 06.08.2012, made in S.C.No.23 of 2012, by the learned IVth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The respondents 2 to 5 are the accused Nos.1 to 4 in S.C.No.23 of 2012 on the file of the learned IVth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. Accused Nos.1 and 2 stood charged for the offence under Section 302 IPC and the accused 3 and 4 stood charged for the offence under Section 302 r/w 114 IPC. By judgment dated 06.08.2012, the trial Court acquitted all the four accused. The appellant is the father of the deceased. He has come up with this appeal challenging the acquittal of the respondents 2 to 5. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows; (a) The land comprised in Survey No.395/2, situated at Siththar Sillage in Tirunelveli District, was originally owned by one Mr.Shahul Hameed. The accused 1 to 4 were the cultivating tenan...
P. Kannadasan Vs. The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to conduct reauction for cutting of Seemai Karuvelai Trees in Senthani Kanmai, Kadambur Panchayat, Thiruvadanai, Ramnad District by considering the petitioner's representation / proposal as per Rules 18 and 19 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats (Procedure for conducting public auction of lease and sales in Panchayats) Rules, 2001.) 1. The Writ Petition has been filed praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to conduct reauction for cutting of Seemai Karuvelai Trees in Senthani Kanmai, Kadambur Panchayat, Thiruvadanai, Ramnad District by considering the petitioner's representation / proposal as per Rules 18 and 19 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats (Procedure for conducting public auction of lease and sales in Panchayats) Rules, 2001. 2. The Writ Petition has been filed with regard to the public auction conducted by the of...
M. Anbuselvan Vs. N. Kumutham
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order and decreetal order dated 13.08.2015 made in I.A.No.260 of 2014 in H.M.O.P.No.12 of 2014 on the file of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Karur.) 1. As only a short point is involved, we shall dispose of this Revision today at the admission stage itself. 2. The revision petitioner married the respondent. Difference of opinion arose between them. Now, they are living separately. The revision petitioner filed H.M.O.P.No.12 of 2014 before the learned Additional Sub Judge, Karur to divorce his wife. She filed I.A.No.260 of 2014 under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking interim maintenance at Rs.20,000/- per month and also Rs.10,000/- towards litigation expenses. 3. The trial Court granted her Rs.2,500/- per month and a lumpsum amount of Rs.10,000/- towards litigation expenses. 4. Aggrieved, the husband has directed this Revision. 5. According to the learne...
P.R. Sathiyamoorthy Vs. M/s. India Cements Capital and Finance Ltd.
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to quash the proceeding in S.T.C.No.719 of 2015 on the file of the learnedJudicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli District.) 1. On 27.10.2015, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence the matter was ordered to be posted today i.e., on 28.10.2015 under the caption 'for dismissal'. 2. Even today when the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is also dismissed....
K. Muthukrishnan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Anti Land Grabbing ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint dated 1.7.2014 lodged by the petitioner.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the second respondent to register a case on the complaint dated 1.7.2014 lodged by the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to the second respondent as early as on 01.07.2014, but, however, the second respondent police has not taken any steps to register a case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner in C.S.R.No.469 of 2014 dated 04.08.2014, the petition enquiry is closed and the closure report is also given to the petitioner. 4. Recording the submissions o...
M/s. Roadways India Ltd. and Others Vs. Randir Singh
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to quash the proceedings in respect of the petitioners in C.C.No.385 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Trichy.) 1. The petitioners, who are arrayed as A5 to A10, have come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to quash the proceedings in respect of the petitioners in C.C.No.385 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Trichy, in respect of an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, by stating that the first petitioner / A5 is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, being run in the name and style of M/s.Roadways India Ltd, doing the business throughout India and having branch at Trichy. The petitioners / A5 to A10 are nothing to do with the issuance of cheque and also on day to-day business activities. A5 and A6 are the Directors, who stationed at Delhi; A7 and A8 are the Deputy General Managers, stationed a...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »