A. Daisy Rani and Others Vs. State rep. by The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi and Others

A. Daisy Rani and Others vs State rep. by The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Oct 28, 2015

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1178543

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1178543
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: The Honourable Ms. Justice R. Mala
Decided On: Oct 28, 2015
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) Nos. 18476, 18493, 19494, 20116, 20241, 20327 of 2015
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A. Daisy Rani and Others

Respondent

State rep. by The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 482 of cr.p.c. praying to direct the respondents herein to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 4.9.2015, investigate the same in accordance with law and file final report within a reasonable time.) 1. the petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the respondents herein to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 4.9.2015, investigate the same in accordance with law and file final report within a reasonable time. 2. the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to the second respondent as early as on 04.09.2015, but, however, the second respondent police has not taken any steps to register a case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief. 3. at this juncture, the learned government advocate (crl. side), on instructions, would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry in c.s.r.no.503 of 2015 is pending. he would further submit that the petitioner did not co-operate with the enquiry. 4. considering the rival submission made on both sides, the petitioner is directed to co-operate with the enquiry and similarly, the second respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and follow the dictum laid down in lalitha kumari vs. govt. of u.p and others [2013 (4) crimes 243 (sc) and register a case, if any cognizable offence is made out. 5. the criminal original petition is disposed of with the above direction.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents herein to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 4.9.2015, investigate the same in accordance with law and file final report within a reasonable time.)

1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the respondents herein to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 4.9.2015, investigate the same in accordance with law and file final report within a reasonable time.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to the second respondent as early as on 04.09.2015, but, however, the second respondent police has not taken any steps to register a case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief.

3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry in C.S.R.No.503 of 2015 is pending. He would further submit that the petitioner did not co-operate with the enquiry.

4. Considering the rival submission made on both sides, the petitioner is directed to co-operate with the enquiry and similarly, the second respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and follow the dictum laid down in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P and others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC) and register a case, if any cognizable offence is made out.

5. The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2015 Same Parties A. Daisy Rani and Others vs State rep. by The Superintendent ... Same Subject Education Same Judge The Honourable Ms. Justice R. Mala