Chennai Court September 2014 Judgments
1.Kaliyammal Vs. State Represented By,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR Criminal Appeal(Md.No.234 of 2007 1.Kaliyammal 2.Mariyammal ..Appellants versus State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Theni Police Station, in Crime No.278 of 2004, Theni District..Respondent Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., to call for records and set aside the order of conviction and sentence passed in S.C.No.34 of 2006 dated 26.04.2007 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Theni and allow this appeal and acquit the appellants accused from the charge levelled against them. !For Appellant : Mr.A.K.Azagarsami ^For Respondent : Mr.T.Mohan, Additional Public Prosecutor. :JUDGMENT The accused Nos.1 and 2 in S.C.No.34 of 2006 decided by the Principal Sessions Judge, Theni were prosecuted in the said case for offences punishable under Sections 323 IPC and 306 IPC. At the conclusion of trial, the learned Principal Sessions Judge held them guilt...
Tag this Judgment!K.Jebakumar Vs. 1 the Director General of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI. DATED:25. 09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.KIRUBAKARAN CRL.O.P.(MD)NO.8601 of 2012 K.Jebakumar .. Petitioner Versus 1 The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. 2.The Inspector General of Police, South Zone, New Natham Road, Madurai. 3.The Inspector General of Police, Central Zone, Trichy City. 4.Rajeev Shukla, Chairman, Governing Council, Indian Premier League-V, 5, Safdarjung Road, New Delhi. 5.Srinivasan, President, Board of Control for Cricket in India, Reg.Off at M.A.Chidambaram Stadium, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 6.Amitabh Batchan, Cine Artiste, ?.Pratiksha?. 10th Road, Juhu Scheme, Mumbai-400 001,Maharastra State. 7.Kareena Kappor, Cine Artiste, 2-B,/110 ?.Excellency?. 4th Cross Road, Lokanwala Complex, Mumbai-400 061, Maharastra. 8.Salman Khan, Cine Artiste, 3, Galaxy Apartments, BJ Road Band Stand, Bandra West, Mumbai-400 050, Maharastra State. 9.Katy Perry, Pop Singer, 150,...
Tag this Judgment!Koothaperumal Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :25. 09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.(MD)No.15277 of 2014 Koothaperumal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Narikudi Police Station, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Sub Inspector of Police, A.Mukkulam Police Station, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant permission and protection to the cultural dance programme to be held on 30.09.2014 at Chithanenthal Village, Kariaptti Taluk, Virudhunagar District. !For Petitioner ... Mr.B.Senthil Kumar ^For Respondents ... Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan Additional Government Pleader :ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant permission and protection to the cultural dance programme to be...
Tag this Judgment!National Horticultural Research Vs. P.Murugesan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25. 09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1840 of 2013 & M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013 National Horticultural Research & Developlment Foundation(NHRDF) 54, Pandian Nagar, Dindigul, Dindigul District.-624 001. ...Petitioner/Petitioner /Respondent -Vs- P.Murugesan ...Respondent/Respondent/ Petitioner Prayer Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order in I.A.No.95 of 2012 in I.D.No.100 of 2010 dated 13.09.2012 on the file of the Labour Court, Trichy, (Camp at Dindigul) allow the same. !For Petitioner :Mr.V.O.S.Kalaiselvam :ORDER The Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the Management against the order of dismissal of its application filed to decide the maintainability of the petition filed by the respondent under Section 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, as a preliminary point at the first instance before embarking upon the merits of the case....
Tag this Judgment!M.Marirajan Vs. 1)The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :25. 09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD)No.852 of 2014 M.Marirajan ... Petitioner Vs. 1) The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2) The District Collector and District Magistrate, Office of the District Collector and District Magistrate, Virudhunagar District. 3) The Superintendent of Police, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai District. 4) The Inspector of Police, Sattur PEW Police Station, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to call for the entire records connected with the detention order of the respondent No.2 in Cr.M.P.No.9/2014 (BOOTLEGGER) dated 10.07.2014 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu namely, Marirajan, Son of Muthu Alagirisamy Naidu, aged about 50 years now detained in Madurai Cent...
Tag this Judgment!E.Marees Kumar Vs. 1. the State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25. 09.2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P(MD) No.8404 of 2014 & M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 E.Marees Kumar .. Petitioner Vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary, Highways and Minor Ports Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai-9.2. The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.3. The Divisional Engineer, State Highways Department, Virudhunagar Region, Virudhunagar District.4. The District Forest Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. .. Respondents Prayer This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constituion of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents or their subordinates from in any way cutting or felling trees in the Sivakasi to Virudhunagar Main Road, Virudhungar District and consequently direct the respondents to compensate the trees already cut by planting adequate number of trees and maintain the same w...
Tag this Judgment!K.Ganesan Vs. 1.The Director of School Education,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-24-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Writ Petition(MD)No.14108 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1, 3 to 6 and 8 of 2013 K.Ganesan ..Petitioner versus 1.The Director of School Education, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai-600006. 2.The Chief Educational Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The District Educational Officer, Madurai Educational District, Madurai. 4.The District Educational Officer, Melur Educational District, Madurai. 5.The District Educational Officer, Usilampatti Educational District, Madurai. 6.P.Muthuselvi 7.J.Siva 8.M.Soundararajan 9.P.Murugeshwari 10.V.Kumar 11.K.Chandran 12.K.Suriyan 13.Munishkumar ..Respondents (Respondents 6 to 13 impleaded as per orderdated 03.09.2013 in MP(MD)No.2/2013.) Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the 5th respondent, dated 23.11.2012, pertaining to the selection p...
Tag this Judgment!S.Annamalai Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-24-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.(MD)No.4194 of 2013 S.Annamalai : Petitioner versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Secretariat, Fort St. Goerge, Chennai. 2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Tirunelveli Division, Nagercoil Region, Kanyakumari District. 3.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Tirunelveli Division, Nagercoil Region, Kanyakumari District. : Respondents Prayer in both writ petitions Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the impugned order in Letter No.13227/A10/TNSTC/TLY/Nagercoil/97 dated 28.09.2012 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same as the same is against law and consequently direct the respondents to refix the petitioner's salary as per the petitioner's original appointment as a Conductor with b...
Tag this Judgment!Durairaj @ Duraikannu Vs. State Through the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-24-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated :24. 09.2014 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice S.MANIKUMAR and The Honourable Mr.Justice V.S.RAVI Crl.A.(MD)No.351 of 2008 Durairaj @ Duraikannu ...Appellant -vs- State through the Inspector of Police, Thiruvidaimaruthur (L & O), Police Station, Cr.No.282/2001 Thanjavur District. ...Respondent Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 Cr.P.C. to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant/accused by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court No.I, Thanjavur, in S.C.No.93 of 2003, dated 01.08.2003 and allow the appeal and acquit the appellant/accused. For Appellant :Mr.R.Jayaraman for Mr.S.Mohan Doss For respondent :Mr.A.Ramar Addl. Public Prosecutor. :JUDGMENT V.S.RAVI,J The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.93 of 2003, on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge / Fast Track Court No.I, Thanjavur. The Trial Court by its judgment dated 01.08.2003 convicted the app...
Tag this Judgment!Rajeshkumar Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-24-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :24. 09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.(MD)No.15952 of 2014 Rajeshkumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 2.The Inspector of Police, Eral Police Station, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondents herein to grant permission to conduct the ".Aadalum Paadalum". dance Programme on 04.10.2014 from 8.00 p.m. to 12.00 p.m., in pursuant to the 'Kodai Vizha Festival' of the Sree Agalikkaraisamy Thirukoil, Umarikadu Village, Srivaikumdam Taluk, Thoothukudi District by considering the Petitioner's representation dated 22.09.2014. !For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Deenadhayalan ^For Respondents ... Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan Additional Government Pleader :ORDER The writ petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »