Chennai Court August 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Raju Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCHOF THE MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:07.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Writ Petition (MD)No.13312 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 K.Raju ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 3.The District Manager, TASMAC Ltd., I.M.F.S.Department, TASCO Building, Ambasamudram Road, No.21, Keelamunneerpallam, Tirunelveli District. 4.K.Mariappan ..Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for records pertaining to the impugned order No.Na.Ka.No.A4/171/03, date 03.08.2011, on the file of the 3rd respondent, quashing the same and consequently to direct the authorities to transfer the TASMAC Retain Vending Shop No.10820 and the Bar attached therewith from door No.10/99-E1 & E2, Papanasam Main Road, Vikramasingapuram, Tiruenlveli ...
Devadhas Vs. Manoharan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM SECOND APPEAL(MD)No.1066 of 2009 and MISCELLANEOUS PETITION(MD)No.3 of 2009 Devadhas .Appellant/ Defendant versus Manoharan .Respondent/ Plaintiff Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the Judgment and decree dated 29.03.2007 passed in Appeal Suit No.66 of 2005 by the District Court, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil reversing the Judgment and decree dated 10.12.2004 passed in Original Suit No.55 of 2004 by the Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram. !For Appellant : Mr.T.Arul ^For Respondent : Mr.C.Godwin :JUDGMENT Challenge in this second appeal is to the Judgment and decree dated 29.03.2007 passed in Appeal Suit No.66 of 2005 by the District Court, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil, wherein the Judgment and decree dated 10.12.2004 passed in Original Suit No.55 of 2004 by the Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram are reversed. 2.The respondent herein as plaintiff has insti...
Kollidam Aaru Pathukappu Nala Sangam Vs. 1.The Union of India, Rep.by ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2014
Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Dated :6. 08-2014 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and The Honourable Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (MD) No.7146 of 2014 Writ Petition (MD) No.7147 to 7157, 7767 to 7772 of 2014, 9265 & 9654 of 2012, 16789 of 2013 & 9153 of 2014 & M.P.(MD)Nos.3 and 3 of 2014 respectively in WP.Nos.7146 and 7147 of 2014 & all other connected pending MPs W.P.No.7146 to 7157 of 2014 Kollidam Aaru Pathukappu Nala Sangam rep.by its President R.Subramanian ...Petitioner W.P.Nos.7767 to 7772 of 2014 P.Ettikkan ...Petitioner Vs 1.The Union of India, rep.by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi-110011. 2.The Member Secretary, State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority III Floor, Panagal Maaligai, Chennai-15. ...Respondents in all WPs 3.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department/WRO, R.C.Division, Cantonment Trichy. ...Respondent in WPs.7146 to 7149, 7151 to 7157 and 7767 t...
S.Chandramohan Vs. 1.The State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:06. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.(MD) No.9918 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 S.Chandramohan ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The State rep.by the Secretary to Government Transport Department Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009 2.The District Collector Sivagangai District, Sivagangai 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Sivagangai Post and District 4.The Managing Director State Transport Corporation Bye Pass Road, Madurai-625 010 ... Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to reconvey the land in Survey No.141/1A1, measuring 1.84.0 Hectares i.e., 4.55 Acres in Madapuram Village, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District, to the petitioner, based on the recommendation of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.A4RPS196/, dated 27.12.2004. !For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai for Mr.R.Maheswaran For Respondents : Mr.D.Mu...
C.Navaneethan Vs. the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :06. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P(MD)No.12902 of 2014 C.Navaneethan ... Petitioner Vs. The Inspector of Police Nagamalai Pudukkottai Police Station, Madurai 625 019. ... Respondents Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in pursuant to the order dated 05.08.2014 on the file of the Respondent police and quash the same and direct the Respondent police to grant permission to conduct a dance program viz. Aadalum - Padalum on 11.08.2014 (Monday) from 06.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. at Arulmigu Santhana Mariamman Thirukoil at Achampathu Village Madurai - 19. !For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karthikeyavenkitachalapathi ^For Respondent : Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan AGP :ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in pursuant to the ...
Kamatchi Vs. 1.K.Onnappan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.R.P(MD)No.655 of 2006 & C.M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2006 Kamatchi .Petitioner versus 1.K.Onnappan 2.O.Chellammal 3.K.Mallaiyan 4.M.Vijayalakshmi 5.T.Sannasi 6.G.Palanisamy 7.J.Indirani 8.J.Srinivasan 9.J.Pugalendi .Respondents PRAYER Civil Revision Petition is filed, under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the fair and decretal order, dated 27.07.2006, made in I.A.No.402 of 2005 in O.S.No.411 of 1980, on the file of District Munsif Court, Nilakottai. !For Petitioner : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu ^For Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : Mr.D.Senthil :ORDER This civil revision petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decretal order, dated 27.07.2006, made in I.A.No.402 of 2005 in O.S.No.411 of 1980, on the file of District Munsif Court, Nilakottai. 2.The petitioner is the fiRs.defendant, whereas the respondents 1 to 4 are the legal heirs of the original plaintiff-Unnamalai A...
T.Sivathanulingam Vs. 1. the Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:06.08.2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.A.(MD) Nos.533 of 2014 W.A.(MD) Nos.533to 535 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014(in each case) T.Sivathanulingam ... Appellant in W.A.533 of 2014 M.Rethinasamy ... Appellant in W.A.534 of 2014 M.Rajamony ... Appellant in W.A.535 of 2014 Vs.1. The Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary, Department of Co-operation Food and Consumer Production, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.2. The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Nagerkoil, Kanyakumari District.3. The Manavilai Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank, Friday Market Post, Represented by its Special Officer, Manavilai Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Bank, Friday Market Post, Kanyakumari District.4. The Special Officer, Kanyakumari District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., Nagerkoil, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents/Respondents Prayer Writ Appeals filed under Clause ...
Palaniammal Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.16338 of 2012 Palaniammal ..Petitioner versus 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary to Government, Department of Home, St.George Fort, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chepauk, Chennai. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 4.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 5.The Tahsildar, Dindigul Taluk, Dindigul District. 6.The Village Administrative Officer, Chettinayakanpatty Village, Dindigul Taluk, Dindigul District. 7.Ponnivalavan 8.V.Ramasamy 9.S.Raju ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the third and fourth respondents to initiate departmental proceedings against the 6th and 7th respondents and other Policemen and also initiate legal action against the 8th and 9th respondents...
1. the State of Tamil Nadu Vs. 1. John Amalraj,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:06. 08.2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.A.(MD) No.1370 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Land Administration Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009/ 2. The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.3. The Block Development Officer, Killiyoor Panchayat Union, Killiyoor Post, Kanyakumari District. ... Appellants/Respondents Vs.1. John Amalraj, Water Supply Attender, Middalam Village Panchayat, Kanyakumari District.2. Middalam Panchayat, rep. by its Executive Officer, Middalam and Post, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents/Petitioners Prayer Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 01.08.2013 passed by the learned Judge made in W.P.(MD) No.6473 of 2009. !For Appellants .. Mr.C.Selvaraj, Spl. G.P. ^For ...
Karuppasamy Vs. State Rep by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR Criminal Revision Case (Md.No.355 of 2014 Karuppasamy ..Petitioner versus State rep by Inspector of Police, Rajapalayam North Police Station, Virudhunagar District in Crime No.322 of 2014 ..Respondent Petition filed under Section 397 read with 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records and set aside the order passed by the Court of the Additional District and Sessions Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court for E.C and NDPS Act Cases, Pudukottai in Crl.M.P.No.901 of 2014 on 10.07.2014 and allow this Criminal Revision Case. !For Petitioner : Mr.G.Marimuthu ^For Respondent : Mrs.S.Prabha, Government Advocate. (Crl.Side) :ORDER The revision petitioner is the owner of the motor vehicle namely, a Tata Sumo Car bearing Registration No.TN-24-Q-2806 which was allegedly used by the accused in Crime No.322 of 2014 registered on the file of the Inspector of Police, Rajapalayam North Police Stat...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »