Chennai Court August 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shanthi Nikethan Resident Vs. 1.Saswath Foundation,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-11-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:11. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.A.(MD)No.659 of 2014 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 Shanthi Nikethan Resident Welfare Association, represented by its President, Office at Community Hall, Shanthi Nikethan Apartments, Annanagar, Madurai ?. 625 020. ... Appellant/ 2nd Respondent Vs. 1.Saswath Foundation, represented by its Managing Partner, A.Chandramouli ... 1st Respondent/ Writ Petitioner 2.Tamilnadu Generation & Distribution Corporation, represented by AEE (Distribution), TANGEDCO, Annanagar, Madurai ?. 625 020. ... 2nd Respondent/ 1st Respondent 3.The Electrical Inspector, Plot No.618, Karpaga Nagar, 10th Street, K.Pudur, Madurai. ... 3rd Respondent/ 3rd Respondent Prayer Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letter Patent Act, against the order dated 17.04.2014 passed in W.P(MD)No.4053 of 2014. !For Appellant ... Mr.T.S.R.Venkataramana ^For Respondents ... Mr.G.P...
Meyyappa Sundaram @ Vs. 1.Chidambaram
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-11-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM APPEAL SUIT No.205 of 1991 Meyyappa Sundaram @ P.L.M.Sundaram .Appellant/ Plaintiff versus 1.Chidambaram 2.Palaniappan 3.Meenakshisundaram (died) 4.Deivanai Achi (died) 5.Arunachalam @ Meyyappan (Respondents 1 to 3 are recorded as legal heirs of the deceased fourth respondent and there is no legal heir for the third respondent vide order dated 11.09.2012 made in memo in U.S.R.No.2514 of 2012).Respondents/ Defendants Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the Judgment and decree dated 28.06.1990 passed in Original Suit No.136 of 1988 by the Sub Court, Pudukkottai. !For Appellant : M/s.AL.Gandhimathi ^For Respondents : Mr.J.Anandkumar 1,2 and 5 for Mr.S.Chockalingam :JUDGMENT Challenge in this Appeal Suit is to the Judgment and decree dated 28.06.1990 passed in Original Suit No.136 of 1988 by the Sub Court, Pudukkottai. 2.The appellant here...
Anamalai Paper Mills Pvt., Ltd., Vs. 1.Tamil Nadu Generation and
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-11-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:11. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.(MD) No.16929 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 Anamalai Paper Mills Pvt., Ltd., rep.by it's CEO Mr.Negin Peter Ernakulam District, Kerala ... Petitioner -vs- 1.Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., NPKRR Maaligai, 144, Anna Salai Chennai-600 002 rep.by it's Chairmain-cum- Managing Director Thiru.K.Gnanadesikan I.A.S., 2.The Superintending Engineer Dindigul Electricity Distribution Circle Dindigul-2 ... Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent in Proceedings No.Lr.No.SE/DEDC/DGL/AEE/GL/AE/F.Misc/D.No.832/13, dated 03.06.2013, and quash the same as ultra vires, arbitrary and illegal and consequentially direct the respondent to allow the petitioner's application for new HT Supply at S.F.No.515/575/2, Pushpathu...
M.M.S.Hasan Ali Vs. 1.Haji M.Nazar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-08-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.R.P(MD)No.1099 of 2014 M.M.S.Hasan Ali S/o. Ali Moideen Residing at No.13/25 Chidambarar Street, Kalan Colony, Udangudi Tuticorin District, now residing at No.125/2 Gandhi Road West Tambaram Chennai .. Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff Vs. 1.Haji M.Nazar 2.Haji M.Kamaludeen 3.Haji M.Sadiq S/o.Late Madhar Sahib No.78 Muthuranga Mudali Street, West Tambaram Chennai. ..Respondents/Respondents/Defendants PRAYER Civil Revision Petition is filed, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 28.02.2014 passed in I.A.No.84 of 2014 in O.S.No.34 of 2014 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Subbiah :ORDER The Judgment and Decree dated 28.02.2014 passed in I.A.No.84 of 2014 in O.S.No.34 of 2014 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin, dismissing the Interlocutory application, is under challenge in this ...
M.Ragunath Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-08-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.2849 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 M.Ragunath : Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Secretary to Government, Home Department, Chennai 9. 2.The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai 4. 3.The Additional Director General of Police, Law and Order, Chennai. 4.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City. : Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records especially the punishment of compulsory retirement from service order issued by the fourth respondent, pursuant to his proceedings viz., final order made in P.R.No.93/06 under Rule 3(b), dated 24.08.2007, as modified as reduction in pay by three stages for three years without cumulative effect by the respondent No.3 made in Rc.No.167395/AP.2(1)/2007, dated 05.11.2007, as further confir...
N.Kandhimathinatha Vs. the Commissioner,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-08-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.A.(MD).No.616 of 2013 N.Kandhimathinathan : Appellant Vs. The Commissioner, Tirunelveli Municipal Corporation, Tirunelveli. : Respondent PRAYER Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order, dated 18.04.2013, made in W.P.(MD).No.7285 of 2010 on the file of this Court. !For Appellant : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai ^For Respondent : Mr.Aaiyaram K.Selvakumar Government Advocate :JUDGMENT M.JAICHANDREN, J.Heard Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai, the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr.Aaiyaram K.Selvakumar, the learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondent.2. This Writ Appeal has been filed against the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 18.04.2013, made in W.P.(MD).No.7285 of 2010.3. The petitioner in the Writ Petition, in W.P.(MD).No.7285 of 2010, is the appellant in the pres...
1.R.Shanmugakani Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-08-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.13867 of 2011 1.R.Shanmugakani 2.Minor S.Vasantha Kumari 3.Minor S.Senthilmurugan : Petitioners Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai. 2.The Director, Medical and Rural Health Services, Chennai 6. 3.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 4.Dr.Tmt.Alagusundarammal Obstetric & Gynecologist, Government Hospital, Rajapalayam. 5.Dr.S.Sakthivel, No.157/41(3), T.P.Mills Road, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District. 6.Z.Arockiammal, Staff Nurse, Government Hospital, Rajapalayam. : Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay a compensation of Rs.15,00,000/- for the death of Ramalakshimi with reasonable interest from the date of the death or to any reason...
L.Saraswathi Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-08-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.10295 of 2009 and M.P.No.2 of 2009 L.Saraswathi : Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Agricultural Production Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Agricultural Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai 9. 2.The Deputy Director of Horticulture, Tirunelveli. 3.The Commissioner for Disciplinary Proceedings, No.4/929, 40 Feet Road, Rhamath Nagar, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli 11. : Respondents [Cause title in respect of R-3 amended, vide order, dated 04.01.2013 made in M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2012].. PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order, dated 24.02.2003, made in T.D.P.Case No.1 of 2002, passed by the third respondent and the consequential proceedings made in G.O.[3D]..No.96, dated 30.06.2009, passed by the first respondent and quas...
1.Muthuramu Vs. 1.A.Muthulakshmi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-08-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.R.P.(MD)No.580 of 2010 & M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2010 1.Muthuramu 2.A.Rajaram .Petitioners versus 1.A.Muthulakshmi 2.M.Ponnalagu .Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order, dated 22.12.2009, made in I.A.No.423 of 2009 in O.S.No.175 of 2004 on the file of District Munsif Court, Nilakottai. !For Petitioners : Mr.P.Thirumahilmaran ^For Respondents : Mr.J.Mathesh :ORDER This civil revision petition has been filed to set aside the order, dated 22.12.2009, made in I.A.No.423 of 2009 in O.S.No.175 of 2004 on the file of District Munsif Court, Nilakottai. 2.The revision petitioners herein are the defendants 1 and 2, whereas the respondents are the plaintiffs in the suit in O.S.No.175 of 2004 on the file of District Munsif Court, Nilakottai. 3.The respondents filed the suit for declaration and other relief. The petitio...
M.Saravana Kumar Vs. 1.The Commandant,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-08-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.5738 of 2008 M.Saravana Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commandant, T.S.P., IX Battalion, Manimuthar, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Armed Police, Trichy - 12, Tiruchirapally District. 3.The Director General of Police, Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent issued in the reference P.R.No.3/2005, dated 11.07.2005 and the impugned order of the second respondent issued in reference C.No.A2/10254/2006, dated 08.12.2006 and the impugned order of the third respondent issued in the reference R.C.No.53117/AP3(1)/2007 dated 20.02.2008 and quash the same and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service together with back wages and all the attendant benefits...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »