Chennai Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.Sankar Vs. S.Gunasekaran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.08.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.1975 of 2009 V.Sankar ..Appellant Vs S.Gunasekaran (Died) 1.National Insurance Company Ltd., No.751, Anna Salai, Chennai 2. 2.Srimathi ..Respondents (2nd Respondent was exparte before Tribunal hence notice may be dispense with) Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the Judgment and decree dated 29.09.2008 and made in M.C.O.P.No.5316 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Court / Fast Track Court-I, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.C.Prabhakaran for Mr.V.Jagannathan For Respondents: Mr.S.Vadivel for R1 R2 Exparte JUDGMENT The appellant / petitioner has preferred the present appeal in C.M.A.No.1975 of 2009, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.5316 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Court / Fast Track Court-I, Chennai. 2.The short ...
Anjalai Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Date ::05. 08.2013 Coram :: The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Dhanapalan and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.T. Selvam H.C.P. No:731. of 2013 Mrs. Anjalai No:84. Raja Nagar Pudhupattinam Kalpakkam via Kanchipuram District. ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Govt. Prohibition and Excise Dept. Fort St. George Chennai 0 600 009.2. The District Collector and District Magistrate Kanchipuram District. ... Respondents .. .. .. Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus praying for a direction to call for the entire records connected with the order of detention passed by the 2nd respondent in B.D.F.G.I.S.S.V. No:63. of 2013 dated 10.04.2013 consequently, directing the respondents to produce the detenue namely, the petitioner's daughter Tmt. Uma, w/o.Kumar aged about 28 years before this Hon'ble Court and set her at liberty. For petitioner :: M/s. S.P. Venkatesh Fo...
D.Elumalai Vs. Hidayathullah
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05 / 08 / 2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN Crl.R.C.No.846 of 2005 D.Elumalai .Petitioner versus Hidayathullah .Respondent Prayer :- Criminal Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., against the Judgment of the Additional District-Cum-Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.I).Chennai in C.A.No.76 of 2000 order dated 05.11.2004 sentencing the Petitioner herein to undergo imprisonment till raising of Court (I.R.T.C) and imposing a fine of Rs.71,000/- under Section 357(b) of Cr.P.C.for an alleged offence under Section 420 I.P.C.by modifying the order passed by the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai-600 015 in C.C.No.7163 of 1994 dated 27.03.2000. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Vijayaraghaven For Respondent : No Appearance - - - ORDER The short facts of the case are as follows:- The original complaint namely S.H.Basha had filed a private complaint in C.C.No.7163 of 1994, on the file of XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Sai...
Rajakannu Vs. Govindasamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.08.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.2709 of 2009 Rajakannu .Appellant Vs 1. Govindasamy 2. Koteeswaran 3. The Oriental Insurance Company Rep. by It's Divisional Manager 4, Bharathidasan Road Contonment Trichirapalli .Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the fair and decreetal order of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Additional District Court).Puducherry at Karaikal, dated 13.03.2009 made in M.C.O.P.No.233 of 2007. For Appellant : Mr.S.Sounthar For Respondents : Mr.M.J.Vijayaraghavan (for R3) R1 & R2 - Exparte JUDGMENT The appellant herein / claimant has filed M.C.O.P.No.233 of 2007, against the respondents herein stating that when he was proceeding on the motorcycle bearing Registration No.TN-51-T-5791, on the Porayar Road, on 10.07.2007 at about 10.30 a.m., on the extreme left of the road, the 2nd respondent's lorry bearing Registration No.TN...
M/S.United India Insurance Company Limited, Vs. 1.Gomathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:05. 08/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.840 of 2004 and M.P.(MD)No.4997 of 2004 M/s.United India Insurance Company Limited, Kovilpatti. ... Appellant Vs. 1.Gomathi 2.Sakthivel 3.Mariappan 4.Senthur Pandian 5.S.R.Pasupathi (R-5 set exparte in lower Court) 6.Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Madurai Division-III, Nagercoil, Through its Managing Director. ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree dated 21.09.2001 made in M.C.O.P.No.103 of 2000, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Judge, Sankarankovil. !For Appellant ... Mr.K.S.Narasimhan ^For Respondents ... Mr.K.Swamidurai for R-1 to R-4 R-5 (Exparte) Mr.S.C.Herold Singh for R-6 - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / third respondent has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.103 of 2000, on the fi...
Munusamy Vs. Ramachandran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :01. 08.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAVICHANDRABAABU Civil Revision Petition (NPD)NO.3248 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 ......... Munusamy .. Petitioner Vs. Ramachandran .. Respondent Petition filed under Section 115 of the CPC against the order dated 28.6.2012 in E.A.No.2 of 2012 in E.P.No.8 of 2009 in O.S.No.43 of 2000 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Gingee. For Petitioners : Mr. ADV. Alexander.G. For Respondents : Mr. R. Murugesan ORDER The petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.43 of 2000 filed by the respondent herein for recovery of money.2. The said suit filed before the Sub Court, Tindivanam, came to be decreed exparte on 6.6.2000. After nine years, the respondent/ decree holder filed E.P.No.8 of 2009 on the file of the Sub Court, Gingee as the suit was subsequently transferred to the said Court from Sub Court, Tindivanam, in view of bifurcation of the territorial jurisdiction. In the said execution petition,...
K.C.Dinakaran Vs. All India Council of Technical Education
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 01 - 08 - 2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL Writ Petition No.17335 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.18831 of 2005 K.C.Dinakaran .Petitioner versus 1. All India Council of Technical Education Indira Gandhi Sports Complex I.P.Estate Delhi 2. The Registrar Anna University Guindy Chennai 3. The Controller of Examinations Anna University Guindy Chennai 4. The Principal P.T.Lee Chengalvaraya Naicker College of Engineering & Technology Oovery Veliyur Post Kanchipuram District .Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 and 3 to accept the Application Form for II Semester Examination of the I year in B.E.Degree CouRs.in E.C.E.Branch for the academic year 2004 2005 and issue Hall Ticket to the petitioner permitting him to appear for the II Semester Examination of the I Year CouRs.in B.E.(E.C.E.) for the academic year 2004 05 and to publish the result of I...
S.S.Prasad Babu Vs. Member Secretary Cmda
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 1.8.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.11654 of 2013 S.S.PRASAD BABU [ PETITIONER ].Vs CHENNAI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY NO.1, GANDHI IRWIN ROAD, EGMORE CHENNAI-8. [ RESPONDENT ].This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent from levying charges towards premium FSI based on the revised guideline value for the property being developed by the petitioner in Old Survey No.174/1,2,4, 177/4 part, 177/5, 5B, 5C, 6 and 8 part, T.S.No.14/2, 98/2, 99/1,2,3, 100, 106, 109, Block No.4, Ward 'C' of Zamin Pallavaram Village, Pallavaram Municipality of an extent of 1,28,353.01 sq.ft. and based on the guideline value as it existed on 1.12.2011 when the application in Reference No.B1/20947/2011 dated 1.12.2011 was submitted by the petitioner seeking sanction for planning permission. For p...
Ajantha Care Company Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:01.08.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.No.18070 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.19636 of 2005 M/s.Ajantha Care Company Ltd. Rep. By its Manager Mr.Balaji. ... petitioner Versus 1.The Commissioner of Police, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. 2.The Inspector of Police, R1 Mambalam Police Station, Chennai 600 017. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 18.05.2005 and to file a final report according to rules and norms. For petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.Naveenatham, Additional Government Pleader ORDER The petitioner has focused the present Writ of Mandamus in directing the respondents to register its complaint dated 18.05.2005 and to file a final report according to rules.2. According to the petitioner Selvaraj and others services were terminated by the pet...
K.Krishnasamy Vs. K.Palanivel
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01.08.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(NPD) No.2306 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 K.Krishnasamy .Petitioner ..vs.K.Palanivel .Respondent Prayer:Civil revision petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C.against the fair and final order dated 08.03.2013 passed in I.A.No.1291 of 2011 in O.S.No.18/2006 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Namakkal. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Nalliyappan ORDER The petitioner is the defendant in a suit for bare injunction filed by the respondent herein in O.S.No.18/2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Namakkal. He is aggrieved against the order passed in I.A.No.1291/2011 in dismissing the application filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act, seeking to condone the delay of 1904 days in filing the petition to set aside the exparte decree dated 26.04.2006. 2.Heard Mr.R.Nalliyappan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials placed before m...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »