Chennai Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Khaja Mohideen Vs. M.Mohammed Saliha
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:04. 07.2013 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU A.S.No.839 of 1995 1.Khaja Mohideen 2.Khaleelur Rahaman ... Plaintiffs/Appellants Vs 1.M.Mohammed Saliha (died) 2.Kudaisa Bibi 3.Hyder Ali 4.Safear Ali 5.Misiria Begam 6.B.S.Perumal Chetty 7.Rahamathullah 8.Dharapuram Dye Chemicals by its Managing Director Sri.Palaniswamy Gounder 9.Basheer Ahmed and Brothers a firm by Partner Basheer Ahmed 10.Saburabibi 11.M.Mohaammed Farook 12.Rukaya Bibi 13.M.Syed Ibrahim (alias) Maulana 14.M.Jafer Sadiq 15.M.Mohammed Mubarak Ali 16.M.Mohammed Iliyas 17.S.Syed Ali Fathima @ Aliar 18.S.Jaibuneesa Begam alias Makkama 19.Arifa Begam 20.S.Kathija Begam 21.J.Sundaravadivel 22.G.Rajkumar 23.Muthurathinam ... Defendants/Respondents First appeal filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.109 of 1986 dated 25.02.2008 on the file of I Additional District Court, Erode, Erode District. For Plaintiffs .....
Rajagopal Gounder Vs. Madurai Gounder
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :04. 07.2013 Coram The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.S.Ramanathan A.S.No.749 of 1996 Rajagopal Gounder ...Appellant Vs. 1.Madurai Gounder ( deceased ) 2.Govindasamy Gounder 3.Elumalai 4.Durai Gounder 5.Parasuraman 6.Mani 7.Krishnamoorthy 8.Lakshmi Ammal 9.Naduponnu 10.Thillai (R-9 &10 brought on record as lrs of the deceased R-1, vide order dt.4.6.2013 in C.M.P.Nos.669 to 671/2009) ...Respondents This Appeal has been filed under Section 96 of C.P.C, against the judgment and decree dated 22.11.1994, passed in O.S.No.42 of 1987, on the file of the Sub Court, Villupuram. For Appellant : Ms.V.Starley, for M/s.V.Raghavachari Associates For Respondents 2, 6 to 8 : Mr.S.K.Ragunathan For Respondent 3 : No appearance For Respondents 4, 5, 9 &10 : Mr.R.Subramanian JUDGEMENT The plaintiff in O.S.No.42 of 1987, on the file of the Sub Court, Villupuram, is the appellant herein. He filed the suit for partition and for mesne profit. 2.The Trial Court de...
S.Shanmugham Vs. K.Athmanathan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:4. 7-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P. (NPD) No.3010 of 2011 S.Shanmugham .. Petitioner Versus K.Athmanathan .. Respondent This petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 04.07.2011 made in I.A.No.30 of 2011 in A.S.No.81 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram. For Petitioner : Mr.N.C.Siddharth for Mr.T.R.Rajaraman For Respondent : Mrs.Kavitha Balakrishnan ORDER The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.373 of 1998 on the file of the Sub-Court, Villupuram seeking to set aside the sale deed alleged to have been executed by the plaintiff on 26.3.1994, and was ordered to be registered on 24.3.1995.2. The said suit came to be dismissed on 30.11.2005. Aggrieved against the same, the petitioner filed an appeal on the file of the Principal District Court, Villupuram in A.S.No.81 of 2009. The said appeal came to be dismissed for default on 15.2.2010. ...
D.Thiagarajan Vs. Managing Director Tahdco
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :04. 07.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition No.17895 of 2013 & M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 D.Thiagarajan .. Petitioner Vs. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Adi Dravidar Housing and Development Corporation Limited (TAHDCO) Tamil Nadu Housing Board Shopping Complex Thirumangalam, Anna Nagar (West) Chennai 101 .. Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned Charge Memo issued by the respondent in his proceeding in A4/ 6482/2010 dated 10.4.2013 and impugned order of suspension passed by the respondent in Se.Mu. Order No.A2/2262/2013 dated 30.4.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent herein to settle the retirement benefits payable to the petitioner with interest at the rate of 24% per annum with effect from 1.5.2013. *** For Petitioner : Mr.K.Raja For Respondents : Mr...
R. Narayanaswamy Vs. Union of India Represented By: the Defence Secret ...
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
V. Periya Karuppiah, Member-Judicial: 1. Heard Mr. SP Ilangovan, Learned Counsel for the applicant appointed by the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority on behalf of the applicant, on maintainability of the application. 2. This application has been filed by the applicant seeking for direction to be issued to the respondents to pay the eligible Army Service Reservist Pension from 1.8.1987 i.e. the date of his retirement from Army and to pay the arrears with 12% interest till the date of such payment. 3. According to the submission of the Learned Counsel for the applicant, the applicant was enrolled in the Army on 23.9.1955 for 10 years colour service and 10 years reserve liability. He would also submit that the applicant was not transferred to reserve service at the time of his discharge on 29.10.1967, even though the discharge was at his request on extreme compassionate grounds. He would also submit that the claim for service pension before the Honble High Court of Madras in Writ ...
K.Arunagirinathan Vs. Venugopal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.07.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(NPD) No.2402 of 2013 K.Arunagirinathan .Petitioner ..vs.Venugopal .Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the District Munsif Court, Chengam to dispose of the application in I.A.No.50 of 2012 in O.S.No.215 of 2005 filed by the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Doraisamy ORDER This civil revision petition is filed seeking for a direction to the court below to dispose of I.A.No.50 of 2012 in O.S.No.215 of 2005 at an early date. 2.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed the said application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, seeking to condone the delay of 2518 days in filing Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C.application. Though the said application was filed as early as on 26.09.2012, till this date the application is not disposed of. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the p...
Khivraj Motors Limited Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:03. 07.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Tax Case (Revision) Nos.224, 244 and 251 of 2011 M/s.Khivraj Motors Limited No.623, Mount Road Chennai-600 006. .. Petitioner in all these T.Cs. versus The State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Assistant Commissioner (CT) Fast Track Assessment Circle-III Greams Road Chennai-600 006. .. Respondent in all these T.Cs. ----- PRAYER: Tax Case Revision Nos.224, 244 and 251 of 2011 are filed under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, to revise the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Main Bench), Chennai, dated 29.07.2008 in T.A.Nos.106, 107 and 105 of 2008 respectively. ----- For petitioner in all these T.Cs.: Mr.K.A.Parthasarathy For respondent in all these T.Cs.: Mr.A.R.Jayapratap Government Advocate (Taxes) ----- ORDER (Order of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J.) The following are the ...
C.Thailamuthu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.07.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.18006 of 2013 C.Thailamuthu .Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by its Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tiruchirappalli. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District. 5.The Accountant General (Accounts & Entitlement).Pension Section-15, No.361, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 018.Respondents This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation dated 9.5.2013 made to him to fix his seniority thereby revising the pension and other retirement benefits by advancing the upgradation as Grade I Police Constable / Head constable on completion of 10/5 years and up...
P.Mahalingam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.07.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.18008 of 2013 P.Mahalingam .Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by its Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tiruchirappalli. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District. 5.The Accountant General (Accounts & Entitlement).Pension Section-15, No.361, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 018.Respondents This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation dated 18.5.2013 made to him to fix his seniority thereby revising the pension and other retirement benefits by advancing the upgradation as Grade I Police Constable / Head constable on completion of 10/5 years and up...
Rattan Steel Works Vs. State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:03. 07.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI TC (Revision).No.379 of 2011 Rattan Steel Works 17, Area II, Maraimalai Nagar Chengalpattu .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamilnadu rep. by Deputy Commissioner (CT) South Chennai .... Respondent Tax Case Revision to revise the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Main Bench) Chennai dated 6.5.2002 passed in TA.No.233 of 2000. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sundareswaran for M/s.K.Venkatasubramanian For Respondent : Mr.A.R.Jayapratap Govt. Advocate (Taxes) ORDER (Order of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J.) The above Tax Case Revision is filed at the instance of the assessee as against the order of Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 6.5.2002 passed in TA No.233 of 2000 in respect of assessment year 1993-94. The above Tax Case Revision was admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- ".1. Whether ...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »