Chennai Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
1.Syed Ahamed Kabir Vs. Naina Mohamed Sahib
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 05/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA C.R.P.(PD) MD.No.924 of 2012 AND M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2012 1.Syed Ahamed Kabir 2.Ms.Mohamed Seeni Fathima 3.Ms.Mohamed Mariam Beevi 4.Md.Syed Saheera Hasana . Petitioners/Defendants Vs Naina Mohamed Sahib ... Respondent/Plaintiff PRAYER Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records relating to the fair and decretal order dated 13.02.2012 passed in I.A.No.13 of 2011 in O.S.No.137 of 2010 on the file of District Munsif Court, Ramanathapuram, and set aside the same. !For Petitioners .. Mr.R.Sundar Srinivasan for M/s.AL.Ganthimathi ^For Respondent .. Mr.S.Ramesh :ORDER The plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.137 of 2010 seeking the relief of declaration and injunction.2. The defendants filed I.A.No.13 of 2011 under Order 14 Rule 2 r/w. Section 151 C.P.C., and Section 12(2) of the Court Fees Act with a prayer to decide the court fees as...
M.Balasundaram Vs. 1. the Senior Commandant,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 05.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.(MD) No.9950 of 2010 M.Balasundaram ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Senior Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, Presiding Officer, Recruitment Board RTC (A), CISF Group Headquarters, 'D' Block, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai - 600 090. 2.The Commandant, CISF Unit, NTPC Dadri, Vidyut Nagar Post, Gautambudh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. 3.The Inspector General/NS Control Industrial Security Force CISF Campus, Saket, Malviya Nagar Post, New Delhi - 110 017. ... Respondents (R3 impleaded as per order dated 08.05.2013in M.P.No.2/10) Prayer The Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the second respondent in connection with the impugned termination order passed by him in his Proceedings in No.E-41014/CISF/NTPC (D)/DOC/2010-327 dated 18.06.2010 and the consequential imp...
The Deputy Commissioner Vs. M/S. Indira Industries
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai
Decided on: May-07-2013
Challa Nagendra Prasad, JM: 1. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-IX, Chennai dated 11.6.2012 in ITA No.286/11-12 for the assessment year 2004-05. The only grievance of the Revenue in this appeal is that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in holding that reopening of assessment under section 147 is invalid. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of manufacturing of silencers and noise control equipments. For the assessment year 2004-05, the assessee filed return on 31.10.2004 admitting loss of Rs.44,91,276/-. The assessment was completed under section 143(3) on 1.6.2005 determining loss at Rs.43,52,762/-. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened under section 147 determining the income of the assessee at Rs.2,95,98,553/-. While completing the reassessment, the Assessing Officer disallowed deduction claimed by the assessee under section 10B and made addi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›